Ex-ABA team seeks more from old TV-rights deal with Pacers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Spirits of St. Louis, a short-lived American Basketball Association team that has made more than $230 million from a 1976 settlement with the National Basketball Association, reopened the lawsuit to claim additional television revenue from the league earned by four teams, including the Indiana Pacers.

The Spirits of St. Louis Basketball Club LP asked a federal judge in Manhattan this month to reopen the antitrust suit originally filed in 1970 by NBA players to block a proposed merger between the two professional basketball leagues. The case led to free agency for NBA players and paved the way for four ABA teams to merge into the NBA.

The Spirits, which were excluded from the merger and forced out of business as a result, agreed in 1976 to release their legal claims in a settlement that guaranteed team owners one-seventh of the television revenue earned by the four teams, now the Pacers, New Jersey Nets, San Antonio Spurs and Denver Nuggets.

The deal has cost the Pacers $4 million to $5 million annually in recent years. The arrangement has no expiration, although the Pacers and NBA have tried to negotiate a settlement.

“Since the agreement was approved, the NBA’s international popularity has grown dramatically,” the Spirits said in papers filed in Manhattan federal court this month. “The Spirits have not shared in that growth, despite their clear contractual right to do so.”

Ozzie and Dan Silna, the Spirits’ former owners, have made more than $237 million from the deal, Forbes estimated earlier this year. Another ABA team shut out of the 1976 merger, the Kentucky Colonels, settled for a one-time payment of $3 million.

The Silnas invested some of their money with convicted con man Bernard Madoff, according to court records. They’ve been sued by Irving Picard, the court-appointed trustee liquidating Madoff’s former firm. Picard is seeking the return of millions of dollars he claims the Silnas took in profits from their Madoff accounts.

Madoff, 73, is serving a 150-year federal prison sentence after pleading guilty to running the biggest Ponzi scheme in history.

Michael Carroll, who represents the Spirits, declined comment on the litigation. Jeff Mishkin, a lawyer for the NBA, also declined to comment. Nets spokesman Barry Baum, Nuggets spokesman Tim Gelt and Pacers spokesman David Benner didn’t immediately return messages seeking comment on the Spirits claim. Spurs spokeswoman Stacey Mitch had no immediate comment.

The Spirits claim the four former ABA teams have failed to pay revenue from international NBA broadcasts and cable television broadcasts outside the teams’ local areas. The teams also owe the Spirits money from games televised on NBA TV and through NBA League Pass, a premium service that gives access to most of the league’s games, the Spirits said in court papers.

“The expansion teams have violated the consent judgment, repeatedly and in several respects,” the Spirits said.

U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska, chief judge of the Manhattan-based federal court, agreed Nov. 7 to review the long-dormant case. The original case was presided over by U.S. District Judge Robert Carter, who is now retired.

The Spirits played in the 1974-’75 and 1975-’76 seasons, according to remembertheaba.com. The ABA, which existed from 1967 to 1976, was known for red, white and blue basketballs, the three-point shot and players with large afro hairdos, according to the site.

The 1970 antitrust suit was filed on behalf of all NBA players by their union representatives, many of whom, including Oscar Robertson, Wes Unseld and Bill Bradley, are now in the Basketball Hall of Fame. Bradley, who played for the New York Knicks, also served as a U.S. senator from New Jersey.

The NBA’s current season, which had been scheduled to start Nov. 1, is suspended while the league and players try to reach a new labor agreement. NBA players on Nov. 14 dissolved their union to file antitrust suits against the league.


  • salivate
    I am still salivating at such a great deal they made 35 yrs ago.
    Dang I want to learn negotiating skills with these guys - think about offering a class, i will suppliment the shortfalls of the pacers. Dang what a deal!
  • Have the CIB bail them out
    Why don't the Pacers ask the CIB (nee city Taxpayers) to help them out? Isn't that the pro-forma response to the Pacers; financial difficulties?
  • What a country!
    The Spirits deal has been written about before, and what great insight to those owners - or even pure luck! What a deal!

    I am surprised that the teams havent figured out how to avoid this payment, though. Maybe the Pacers, Spurs, Nets and Nuggets should fold.
    Personally I think the NBA should go bankrupt, void contracts and sell their assets the new National Basketball League and start all over!
  • Legal Liability
    The Pacers should file suit against their lawyer (at that time)or his insurance carrier for errors and omissions- their lawyer allowed a no-expiration date and no cap deal go through to create a never ending obligation!
  • PAcers
    Don't feel bad for the Pacers, the city gives them about $80k in tax payer dollars each game, including this year when there are no games. This amounts to about $4 million/year.
  • Same ABA
    Is this the same ABA that had the infamous Flint Tropics in the league with that famous player/coach Jackie Moon?
  • What a Gift
    "That there's the gift that keeps on givin the whole year round"
    ----Cousin Eddie

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ