IBJNews

Former BrightPoint exec joins Angie’s List as COO

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A former high-ranking executive of BrightPoint Inc. has joined Angie’s List Inc. as the Indianapolis-based public company’s chief operating officer.

Angie’s List said Thursday morning that J. Mark Howell will begin his duties at the company March 1.

Ingram Micro Inc., the California-based company that acquired BrightPoint three months ago, announced Jan. 7 that Howell would be leaving the company to “pursue personal interests.”

Howell become president of Ingram Micro’s North American region after Brightpoint merged with it in October. He had spent 18 years in upper management at BrightPoint, which provides logistics and distribution services to the mobile technology industry.

Howell told IBJ on Thursday morning that his departure from Ingram Micro was a "natural part of the overall transition" of the company and he is looking forward to contributing to Angie's List.

"[CEO] Bill Oesterle is someone I've known for many, many years and someone I look up to and admire," Howell said. "I think it provides a great professional opportunity to be a part of an incredibly dynamic company."

The chief operating officer position at Angie’s List had been vacant since April, when Scott Brenton left after 13 years to join e-commerce firm One Click Ventures LLC in Greenwood as its chief marketing officer.

Oesterle said in a prepared statement that he is excited to have Howell on board.

“His combination of operations and financial expertise will enhance our leadership team as our company continues its rapid growth,” he said.

In its last quarter, Angie’s List posted a widening loss due to hefty advertising spending, but succeeded in attracting hundreds of thousands of new subscribers to its online business ratings and reviews, boosting revenue 75 percent.

The company said total paid memberships increased 68 percent, to 1.66 million, in the period ended Sept. 30. Paying customers get access to consumer ratings on everything from local plastic surgeons to sewer cleaners.

Shares of Angie’s List were trading at $11.97 each Thursday morning, down 2.3 percent on the day, but up from a 52-week low of $8.94 in August.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • have we seen this Movie before?
    Maybe He's just not comfortable in a business with a true profit motive?
  • Watch out
    Watch out for stock manipulation- it worked for cell- just check out the top people's bank accounts.
    • Goal
      His goal is to double the company's profits.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Gay marriage is coming, whether or not these bigots and zealots like it or not. We must work to ensure future generations remember the likes of Greg Zoeller like they do the racists of our past...in shame.

    2. Perhaps a diagram of all the network connections of all politicians to their supporters and those who are elite/wealthy and how they have voted on bills that may have benefited their supporters. The truth may hurt, but there are no non-disclosures in government.

    3. I'm sure these lawyers were having problems coming up with any non-religious reason to ban same-sex marriage. I've asked proponents of this ban the question many times and the only answers I have received were religious reasons. Quite often the reason had to do with marriage to a pet or marriage between a group even though those have nothing at all to do with this. I'm looking forward to less discrimination in our state soon!

    4. They never let go of the "make babies" argument. It fails instantaneously because a considerable percentage of heterosexual marriages don't produce any children either. Although if someone wants to pass a law that any couple, heterosexual or homosexual, cannot be legally married (and therefore not utilize all legal, financial, and tax benefits that come with it) until they have produced a biological child, that would be fun to see as a spectator. "All this is a reflection of biology," Fisher answered. "Men and women make babies, same-sex couples do not... we have to have a mechanism to regulate that, and marriage is that mechanism." The civil contract called marriage does NOTHING to regulate babymaking, whether purposefully or accidental. These conservatives really need to understand that sex education and access to birth control do far more to regulate babymaking in this country. Moreover, last I checked, same-sex couples can make babies in a variety of ways, and none of them are by accident. Same-sex couples often foster and adopt the children produced by the many accidental pregnancies from mixed-sex couples who have failed at self-regulating their babymaking capabilities.

    5. Every parent I know with kids from 6 -12 has 98.3 on its car radio all the time!! Even when my daughter isn't in the car I sometimes forget to change stations. Not everybody wants to pay for satellite radio. This will be a huge disappointment to my 9 year old. And to me - there's so many songs on the radio that I don't want her listening to.

    ADVERTISEMENT