IBJNews

Former City-County Councilor’s trial gets under way

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The trial of a former City-County Council member charged with attempted extortion and soliciting a bribe got under way Tuesday with jury selection and opening arguments.

Lincoln Plowman, also a former Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department major, is accused of using his official position to collect $6,000 for helping to grease the wheels for a new strip club.

Combined, the charges could result in up to 30 years in prison and a maximum $500,000 fine.

“I do not believe I did anything wrong,” Plowman told IBJ following opening arguments in federal court in Indianapolis. “That’s why I pled not guilty.”

Attorney Richard Pilger of the U.S. Department of Justice’s criminal division, however, painted Plowman as a power-hungry councilor willing to sell his influence for the right price.

A grand jury indicted Plowman in September 2010. From August to December of 2009, the indictment says, Plowman solicited an undercover FBI agent to pay him $5,000 in cash and make a $1,000 campaign contribution in exchange for Plowman’s help with strip club zoning.

Plowman, a Republican who was elected to the council in 2003, was a member of the council’s Metropolitan Development Committee, which recommends appointments to the Board of Zoning Appeals. That board reviews petitions for zoning law variances.

Plowman may have appeared to be a councilor working for the common good, Pilger said, but behind the scenes he was trying to line his pockets with cash.

“Why does he take $5,000 and demand a $1,000 campaign contribution?” he asked the jury. “Because this case is about how the defendant used his power to sell the influence of his office.”

In February 2010, Plowman was put on paid administrative leave from his IMPD job while he was under FBI investigation. He resigned from the police force and the council about a month later as the leave was ending. Plowman faced potential suspension without pay from the department, a step toward termination.

According to court documents, Plowman met with three undercover FBI agents at the downtown Capital Grille on Dec. 22, 2009. A male agent posed as an out-of-state club owner who wanted to open a high-end strip joint in Indianapolis. Two female agents accompanying him acted as friends he had met during his visits to the city.

Plowman first met the undercover agent in August 2009 for lunch at a south-side O’Charley’s restaurant, arriving in his police vehicle and uniform, and boasting about how he controlled city zoning decisions, Pilger told the jury.

The two met in the months ahead at Nicky Blaine’s and Ruth’s Chris Steak House in downtown Indianapolis and at Dancers Showclub on West Washington Street, where Plowman eventually asked for the money, Pilger said.

In the meantime, the FBI agent collected more than five hours of tape recordings that Pilger said he’ll play for the jury.

But Plowman’s lawyer, Jim Voyles, disputed the prosecution’s claims that Plowman first met the agent dressed in his police uniform. He further claimed that the FBI agent insisted on paying Plowman $5,000 and donating $1,000 to his campaign for the work he did.

Voyles said his client spent 50 to 100 hours helping the agent find an appropriate location, even referring him to a real estate broker and lawyer.

Plowman believed the money not to be a bribe but payment for his services, just like an arrangement he had with PT’s Showclub on the east side, which paid him $1,000 a month to serve as its part-time consultant.

Plowman coached the strip club on interior camera locations, provided defensive training programs and advised it on parking and zoning issues, Voyles said.

Voyles acknowledged Plowman never reported the consulting arrangement with IMPD, but whether he knew he was required to is in dispute.

Plowman even insisted to the agent that the $5,000 needed to be reported on a 1099 tax form, Voyles said, which should indicate to jurors that he didn’t view the money as a bribe.

“He never approached a member of the zoning board to do anything illegal for the agent,” Voyles insisted. “He just wanted to be paid $5,000 for the 50 to 100 hours of work he did.”

Judge Larry McKinney is presiding over the trial, which is expected to last about 10 days.

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If what you stated is true, then this article is entirely inaccurate. "State sells bonds" is same as "State borrows money". Supposedly the company will "pay for them". But since we are paying the company, we are still paying for this road with borrowed money, even though the state has $2 billion in the bank.

  2. Andrew hit the nail on the head. AMTRAK provides terrible service and that is why the state has found a contractor to improve the service. More trips, on-time performance, better times, cleanliness and adequate or better restrooms. WI-FI and food service will also be provided. Transit from outlying areas will also be provided. I wouldn't take it the way it is but with the above services and marketing of the service,ridership will improve and more folks will explore Indy and may even want to move here.

  3. They could take the property using eminent domain and save money by not paying the church or building a soccer field and a new driveway. Ctrwd has monthly meetings open to all customers of the district. The meetings are listed and if the customers really cared that much they would show. Ctrwd works hard in every way they can to make sure the customer is put first. Overflows damage the surrounding environment and cost a lot of money every year. There have been many upgrades done through the years to help not send flow to Carmel. Even with the upgrades ctrwd cannot always keep up. I understand how a storage tank could be an eye sore, but has anyone thought to look at other lift stations or storage tanks. Most lift stations are right in the middle of neighborhoods. Some close to schools and soccer fields, and some right in back yards, or at least next to a back yard. We all have to work together to come up with a proper solution. The proposed solution by ctrwd is the best one offered so far.

  4. Fox has comments from several people that seem to have some inside information. I would refer to their website. Changed my whole opionion of this story.

  5. This place is great! I'm piggy backing and saying the Cobb salad is great. But the ribs are awesome. $6.49 for ribs and 2 sides?! They're delicious. If you work downtown, head over there.

ADVERTISEMENT