IBJNews

2014 Forty Under 40: Ben Carlson

Lou Harry
February 1, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
carlson_ben_1col.jpg (IBJ Photo/Aaron P. Bernstein)

Starting with a tweet: Carlson was working on a Microsoft video that trended on Twitter. “I wanted to try to understand, quantitatively, how big it was,” he said. “Did it move the needle for perception of the property?” Finding no good way to converge all of that social conversation into data, he and creative partner Jen Handley created one. “We cooked up a way to measure the social conversation, quantifying volume and sentiment, identifying patterns, and converting that data into stuff that means something.”

Split screens: He shared his thinking with the partners at Broad Ripple-based ad agency Bradley and Montgomery, where Carlson continues to work as chief strategy officer. “They thought it worthwhile enough to help launch it and spin it out as its own company in 2009. I consider myself lucky. I have two jobs that I’m madly in love with.”

Focus: Fizziology tracks every major movie release and sells the data it compiles and analyzes to interested parties, including Universal, Disney and Paramount. While hush-hush about specifics, Carlson said Fizziology was involved with about 40 percent of 2013 studio releases.

AGE 39
Hometown: Carmel

Family: wife, Jessica; children Ella, 10, and Spencer, 8

A Hoosier in Hollywood: Carlson distinctly remembers his first knee-knocking experience entering talent agency CAA—with its “Death-Star-like glass building, and the most beautiful people you can imagine as receptionists.” He said there have been a couple of “what you would imagine a crazy Hollywood meeting would be, but the vast majority of them are incredibly down-to-earth, business-minded conversations with people trying to do a job. It just happens to be in the world of entertainment, which is a lot sexier than selling insurance.”

Spoiler alert: “I love movies,” Carlson said. “But the way I watch them now is completely different from the way I used to. By the time a movie is in theaters, I’ve been thinking about it for years. It’s a little anticlimactic.”

Advice: “You can do what you want to do as long as you put in the time and find the right people to do it with. No one is going to ask you to do it and there’s nobody to ask permission to do it.”•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

  2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

  3. Straight No Chaser

  4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

  5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.

ADVERTISEMENT