2014 Forty Under 40: K. Alicia Schulhof

Lou Harry
February 1, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
schulhof_alicia_k_1col.jpg (IBJ Photo/Aaron P. Bernstein)

Returning to Riley: Schulhof volunteered at Riley Hospital for Children in high school. “I was at their mercy,” Schulhof said. But there was another connection as well. She and her husband were high-school sweethearts introduced by a common friend who fought a battle with cancer and was hospitalized at Riley. “From that point forward,” she said, “I knew I wanted to go back there and work. After getting a lot of experience outside Indiana, I am so proud that I was able to come back home.” She became chief operating officer in 2011, prior to becoming senior vice president at IU Health.

The road to administration: Early on, Schulhof thought she wanted to be a physician. But while studying at Purdue University, she became involved in student organizations and found she enjoyed the administrative and leadership side. “When I learned about IU’s master’s in health care administration, I applied and was blessed to get a full-ride scholarship. I thought it was a good financial decision to go and it ended up working out incredibly well. It allowed me to do what I love, every day.”

Another benefit: “I can play the Purdue card and the IU card when I speak and get cheers on both sides.”

AGE 34
Hometown: Indianapolis

Family: husband, Patrick O’Connor; sons Zach, 8, Joshua, 5, and Bryce, 3

The future of health care: “Those closest to the work know the solutions. Give them authority to change the way they do business. Let them do their jobs and get out of their way. I think that’s how we are going to tackle the next decade or two of health care. Deliver care and provide the least waste with the greatest value.”

Board room temperament: “You have to strike a balance,” she said, “knowing when to step forward, when to step back, and when you let the team guide its own solution. It’s a delicate balance but when you strike it, that’s when you have the most success.”

Board work/family bonding: Schulhof tries to find ways to combine family and charitable time, including volunteering at Ronald McDonald House. “I want to lend my expertise but also do things that my family can participate in.”•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.