2014 Forty Under 40: Monica Peck

Lou Harry
February 1, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
peck_monica_1col.jpg (IBJ Photo/Aaron P. Bernstein)

At work: With sister Courtney, purchased Hare Chevrolet, becoming sixth-generation owners of the company, which was founded in 1847 as a wagon and buggy manufacturer. In 2012, Hare topped the state for sales of new General Motors cars.

Being a local celebrity: “You realize when you are a person in the spotlight that you are going to be an easy target for the haters of the world,” said one half of “The Sisters of Savings.” “It comes with the territory. We’re often asked ‘So, do you really work there?’ People assume we are hired talent or the family chose us.”

Working with Sis: “It definitely adds a different dynamic. We’re both in situations where we are trying to balance young kids and this business and business travel. We try to make it work for each other. You have to choose your battles.”

First job at dealership: “There was always filing to do during holiday breaks,” recalled Peck, who used to go to work with her father and then catch the school bus.

Getting back behind the wheel: After seven years, she left a successful IT career to return to the family business. “I realized I was working hard to build somebody else’s assets. [Meanwhile], there was this asset that could come to me that I wasn’t developing.”

A car person? No, not really. “But [she and her sister] realized this business is about relationships and people and not necessarily about cars.”

AGE 39
Hometown: Noblesville

Family: husband, Darren; children Sydney, 11, and Alexander, 7

Buying in: “My father said he’d like to create an exit strategy for us to take over. We bought him out in January of 2008, when the economy was good. And then the wheels fell off the bus.”

Calling Dad: “It was a pride issue not to call him [for advice] when the economy went to hell in a hand basket. We said, ‘We’re not going to make the call until we 100 percent feel like we have to make the call.’ He made more calls checking on us.”

Point of pride: “We didn’t experience a single month in the red from 2008 to the present.”

10 years from now: No, she doesn’t expect to be selling flying cars. “We definitely have plans for growth and expansion. We’d like to add franchises and diversify the portfolio.”

Benefits of a male-dominated business: “At dealer meetings, there’s no line at the women’s room.”•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.