IBJNews

Fourth Artsgarden walkway gets final approval

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An enclosed pedestrian walkway connecting the downtown PNC Center with the Indianapolis Artsgarden received final approval Thursday morning.

The Regional Center Hearing Examiner OK’d the design of the project after the Metropolitan Development Commission in October approved providing $600,000 in city funds to help build the connector.

The Greater Indianapolis Bond Bank will finance half of the $1.2 million project by using tax increment financing from the downtown district.

The building’s property manager, Massachusetts-based Reit Management & Research LLC, intends to start construction in March and finish by mid-2011.

“Our goal, when we finish, is that you wouldn’t know it was done 15 years later,” said Ben Griffin, project coordinator for locally based Ratio Architects Inc., which designed the walkway.

Connecting all four corners of the Washington and Illinois streets intersection was the original plan when the Artsgarden was designed more than 15 years ago. No one currently associated with the project knows why the fourth connector has never been added.

The Artsgarden opened in September 1995, connecting Circle Centre mall on the southeast corner of the intersection with Claypool Court on the northwest corner.

Attention after the mall opened focused on attracting a retailer to open on the northeast corner of the intersection, where the Conrad Indianapolis now stands. When the hotel opened in 2006, it was connected to the Artsgarden.

Despite support from city leaders, plans for the fourth walkway drew objections in October from several opponents who railed against using taxpayer money to support “wealthy corporations.”

The 16-story PNC Center, previously known as National City Center and Merchants Plaza, houses the Hyatt Regency Indianapolis, the city’s fourth-largest hotel based on number of rooms.

The Hyatt, along with other city hotels, has been targeted by a union group called Central Indiana Jobs with Justice, which is pressuring the hotels to improve their pay scales. About a dozen supporters of the group, armed with signs bearing such slogans as “Vote No on Ballard’s Bridge to Nowhere,” attended the MDC meeting.

Supporters argued that the walkway, as part of the Artsgarden, will be owned by the Arts Council of Indianapolis Inc. They also said TIF funds need to remain within the district and cannot be released into the city’s general fund.
 
The PNC Center, which includes nearly 625,000 square feet of rentable office space, is owned by HRPT Properties Trust of Boston, which bought the building in 2005. HRPT will provide the remaining $600,000 for construction of the walkway. (Check out a rendering here.)

Also at Thursday’s meeting, the hearing examiner approved the design of two paved parking lots that will replace the existing gravel lots on the former site of Market Square Arena.

Paving is set to begin in March and finish in mid-summer. The roughly $800,000 project will feature perimeter landscaping, tree islands to break up 354 spaces, smart light fixtures and walkways to Market Street.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Here's Why Chris
    Chris says:

    "So, why are you tripping out over public money going to a non-profit which actually serves a public purpose and operates a space for the public, rather than to a private entity which only serves the interests of its wealthy major owners and high-ranking executives?"

    You obviously don't know much about the Arts Council or how many non-profits operate, Chris. Non-profits like the Arts Council exist only to pay themselves lavish salaries and benefits. Very little of the money we give them actually goes to artists.
  • The Arts Council Serves the Public
    Jeb, when the city puts up hundreds of millions (really, billions over the past couple of decades) in public subsidies for Lilly, or Dow Agro, or the Pacers or Colts, everyone just says, "Oh, but of course!" So, why are you tripping out over public money going to a non-profit which actually serves a public purpose and operates a space for the public, rather than to a private entity which only serves the interests of its wealthy major owners and high-ranking executives? If you are going to complain about "typical Indianapolis insider dealing," it seems you have focused on the wrong target.
    • So...
      We're putting up the money and the Arts Council will own the walkway? Typical Indianapolis insider dealling. Oh, and the Arts Council...heavily subsidized by Indy taxpayers.
      • Power wash
        I hope someone springs for a power wash of the limestone (below the glass) before the Superbowl.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

      2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

      3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

      4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

      5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

      ADVERTISEMENT