IBJNews

Franciscan, IU Health woo more docs

J.K. Wall
June 6, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

So much for that prediction. A week after a report declared Indianapolis hospitals nearly saturated on physician hiring, two more deals were announced.

Franciscan St. Francis Health acquired Kendrick Regional Center for Colon and Rectal Care, adding Kendrick's six surgeons to its 150-doctor St. Francis Medical Group.

And Indiana University Health Physicians nabbed the remaining nine (out of 13) physicians of University Dermatology Inc., bringing its total employed physicians to more than 550.

Both deals closed June 1—just five days after the Center for Studying Health System Change issued a report saying Indianapolis was nearing a saturation point on hospital employment of physicians.

Indianapolis’ major hospital systems have been trying to gobble up physicians for the past three years. Especially attractive to them are surgical specialists, such as the Kendrick doctors.

Kendrick had a close connection to St. Francis, with its surgeons practicing at St. Francis’ Beech Grove, Indianapolis and Mooresville hospitals. The surgeons also perform surgeries at other hospitals.

Kendrick operates a colorectal surgery residency program and its physicians participate in clinical trials of new products and procedures for colon cancer and rectal cancer.

University Dermatology is filled with physicians who are also professors at IU School of Medicine. IU Health has been trying for more than two years to consolidate physicians employed by IU med school and its Methodist Medical Group. The practice has eight locations in the Indianapolis area, with one more opening in July.

Physicians are interested in becoming hospital employees because their reimbursement rates have been crimped and opportunities to enhance their revenue streams—through physician-owned surgery and imaging centers—have been curtailed. At the same time, physicians are being forced by the federal government to adopt electronic medical records systems, a significant expense.

Hospitals are happy to employ physicians to increase referrals to their facilities. Also, health plans are adopting payment methods to require physicians and hospitals to work closely to keep patients healthy long term or to split payments for complex episodes of surgeries.

The Center for Studying Health System Change, based in Washington, D.C., said hospital employment of physicians got going sooner and has proceeded faster in Indianapolis than in other markets.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT