Tony George is trying to bring Formula One racing back to the United States—but not necessarily to the Indianapolis
Motor Speedway.
George, who was IMS and Indy Racing League chairman until last June, was in China for several days earlier this month to
attend F1’s Chinese Grand Prix in Shanghai April 18 at the invitation of F1 boss Bernie Ecclestone.
While there, George met at length with Ecclestone and Zak Brown, founder and CEO of Just Marketing International, an Indianapolis-based
motorsports marketing firm that represents several high-level F1 sponsors.
Brown and other sources close to F1 said George was there to discuss the series’ future in the United States, examine
China’s motorsports sponsorship base, and meet with global motorsports sponsors who could potentially back a U.S. F1
race.
George
Despite interest from IMS and local tourism officials in bringing the event back to Indianapolis, that might not be George’s
intention.
The Speedway hosted an F1 race from 2000-2007, but the event left after George and Ecclestone couldn’t come to an agreement
that made financial sense for both sides. F1 also has hosted a race in six other U.S. cities since 1980. Each failed, primarily
for financial reasons.
Still, the allure of the growing international racing circuit is undeniable.
“Certainly, a Formula One race would be a high-profile event that could boost our region on a number of levels,”
said Indianapolis Convention & Visitors Association CEO Don Welsh. “The international draw is very appealing.”
But bringing a U.S. Grand Prix to New York is Ecclestone’s No. 1 choice in returning the series to American soil, and
George could be part of a deal to make that happen—and could even play a part in organizing the race, Brown said.
Oddly, Chris Pook, former head of IRL’s nemesis, Champ Car, has been one of Ecclestone’s recent lieutenants in
establishing an F1 presence in the U.S. market.
Jeff Belskus, who replaced George last July as head of the Speedway and IRL, said George was not in China representing the
Speedway or IRL. Belskus added that he was not apprised of George’s trip in advance.
Belskus said the Speedway would be interested in bringing an F1 race back under the right financial circumstances. Motorsports
business experts said Ecclestone would have to lower the F1 sanctioning fee, which ranges from $10 million to $30 million
annually, to make the race feasible in Indianapolis.
Belskus added that he does not think George would work against Hulman-George business interests.
“I believe we have a good relationship with Tony,” Belskus said. “That’s how I’d characterize
it.”
The Speedway and IRL’s board fired George after last year’s Indianapolis 500. The board—which is composed
of George’s three sisters, mother and family attorney—offered to keep George as head of the IRL, but he declined.
George continued to operate his IRL team, Vision Racing, through 2009, but folded it earlier this year, citing lack of sponsorship
money.
George sunk $30 million of the Hulman-George family fortune into building the 2.6-mile serpentine road course and other infrastructure
needed for the USGP at the Speedway. George earlier this year resigned from the board of the Hulman-George family of companies,
and protecting and maximizing a return on that investment may no longer be his primary interest.
Ecclestone has made it clear that he prefers to put an F1 race in a city larger than Indianapolis. Though there is no formal
relationship between George and Ecclestone, George could be a player in the deal to get that done, sources close to the discussions
said.
“Would Tony George love to broker a deal to bring back a U.S. Grand Prix? Sure,” said Brown, who confirmed his
part in the discussions between George and Ecclestone.
Ecclestone has invited George to several F1 races this year and was eager to hear the IRL founder’s input on bringing
F1 back to America, Brown said.
“Tony has a lot of contacts in motorsports, and he knows how to put on a U.S. Grand Prix,” Brown said. “I
think if there’s a role for Tony in trying to bring Formula One back to the U.S., he’d be willing to help. Tony
and Bernie have a very good relationship, and Tony has a lot of interest in seeing F1 return to the U.S.”
Given his departure from the Speedway, it’s difficult to say where George’s interests in F1 lie. Brown said George
simply wants to see motorsports of all types flourish domestically.
Ecclestone also has an eye on other U.S. markets, including San Francisco, Las Vegas and Miami. Brown said long term, Ecclestone
may have interest in holding two races on U.S. soil. F1 sponsors have not been shy about voicing their interest in getting
into American markets.
A major thrust by F1 into the United States could imperil IRL sponsorships and other business interests, said Tim Frost,
president of Frost Motorsports, a Chicago-based motorsports business consultancy.
Randy Bernard, the IRL’s new CEO under Belskus, didn’t discount that notion.
“Anything in the entertainment world from the NFL to F1 is a competitor,” Bernard said.
He hedged when asked if bringing F1 back to the IMS would be in the best interest of the financially struggling IRL.
“If it is good for the Indianapolis Motor Speedway, the city and the state, who am I to make a formal opinion to the
contrary?” Bernard said. “But if it failed … the last time it was here, why would it come back?”
Brown thinks F1’s U.S. growth would help all domestic motorsports.
“It would only increase the spotlight on the sport of racing, and that’s good for the Indy Racing League,”
Brown said.
A return by F1 to Indianapolis would undeniably boost the Speedway’s image as a premier motorsports venue, Frost said.
But if F1 shuns the Speedway for another market, that could damage the facility’s reputation.
“If the world’s top level of motor racing returned to the U.S. and didn’t locate at the Indianapolis Motor
Speedway, you’d really have to scratch your head,” Frost said.
George, who could not be reached for comment, would appear to have at least some interest in seeing an F1 event run at the
track owned by his family’s business empire.
“He still has an ownership stake in the Speedway,” Frost said. “I’m not sure why he would work to
bring it anywhere else unless he’s simply convinced it wouldn’t work there.”•

















IBJ Conversations
21 Comments
Add Comment
I also understand the comments posted that Indianapolis may not have the international cache' Monaco, Abu Dabai, Spa or Monza have as both locations and tracks.
And far from me to judge Bernie Ecclestone in any way besides admiring his amazing ability to coerce country after country to invest billions in his F1 racing series.
I do think Bernie is portrayed as a somewhat curt and unfriendly sort by the press but he's obviously in control of every aspect of FISA.
The real issue is bringing Formula 1 back to the United States - regardless of the location. While Long Beach, San Francisco and even Miami have the "rock n' roll" atmosphere, it makes no difference to me as I'll travel to any US location to watch the boys in those incredible machines.
So best of luck to Mr. Pook in securing a date for F1 in the USA. If Tony George can help with this decision, best of luck to him as well.
I cannot imagine any sane politician who does even a cursory check of Bernie's past involvement in the U.S. market signing on to be the next home of the U.S. Grand Prix. This event is a recipe for certain financial failure.
Chris Pook has spent the past several months giftwrapping the Long Beach Grand Prix for F1. Tony is getting involved because if that happens F1 will have both the highest attended road race anywhere in North America, they will also have the 2nd highest attended open wheel race on the continent.
Bernie doesn't want Indy, he doesn't want NYC or New Jersey. He wants Long Beach and the former leader of IMS has been dispatched to try and stop it.
In the process, Formula 1 has become debased and boring. But it is a Big Show, worldwide.
I would no more blame Bernie for "ruining" F1 than I would hold Tony George responsible for "ruining" open wheel racing. Everything ebbs and flows. Disposable income finds other paths for entertainment.
That said, Bernie gave Tony the Death of 1000 Cuts over the USGP. He left TG with few options to make money on the event. An event which, by the way, has not particularly captured an American audience since Dan Gurney retired.
There is no one person who has accomplished more in his chosen field of endeavor, than Bernie Ecclestone has in Formula 1 Grand Prix racing.
This is not to say that he has not been controversial and enigmatic at times, but anyone whose influence and decision making affects the lives and welfare of so many people, accepts that with the territory.
To call Mr. Ecclestone an idiot is without warrant and recommends the writer as being exactly what he falsely claims Mr. Ecclestone to be.
I have personally known the man for many years, and I can tell you that if there were more men like Bernie, this world, and everything in it, would be a far better experience.
Good Day, Sir
There is no one person who has accomplished more in his chosen field of endeavor, than Bernie Ecclestone has in Formula 1 Grand Prix racing.
This is not to say that he has not been controversial and enigmatic at times, but anyone whose influence and decision making affects the lives and welfare of so many people, accepts that with the territory.
To call Mr. Ecclestone an idiot is without warrant and recommends the writer as being exactly what he falsely claims Mr. Ecclestone to be.
I have personally known the man for many years, and I can tell you that if there were more men like Bernie, this world, and everything in it, would be a far better experience.
Good Day, Sir
In any case the decider is the TV audience. The Bahrain GP crowd was non-existant. Headcount is not important...unless you make a bad deal with Bernie and your sole revenue source is ticket sales.
And I like to repeat one more time. The city of Indianapolis and of course the circuit are top shelf. I don't want anyone to believe I'm slighting them in any way. Further from the truth.
Can put you in touch with him if you'd like to learn from his experiences dealing with Bernie and IMG
Unfortunately, the model for F1 is more rock and roll, glitz and flash. This puts Indianapolis at a disadvantage obviously. Nothing against Indianapolis but it's certainly not a Monaco...
China and new venues are about building the global brand so they get a pass on the glitz -- for now.
It basically leaves NY and San Francisco for the US market. Sorry to say. Perhaps Miami. Maybe. A weak maybe.
You need more than just a track, you need jet set accommodations to include hotels, restaurants etc. This is a byproduct of selling sponsorship to high profile global companies promoting their brands. They want to be seen in all the right places.
San Francisco is the natural winner. A world class city that just sank millions in the Embarcadero. A street race against the bay akin to a Monaco. Hollywood down the road. Famous Napa & Sonoma wine country a stones throw away. World class hotels and Michelin Star restaurants in the backdrop of one the worlds most beautiful cities. Lets not forget the fertile sponsorship grounds of Silicon Valley being right there. The problem with SF is the locals. They (being SF) aren't receptive to this so much because of the Liberal enviro concerns. The local politics is beyond bizarre. Trust me, I live here. I've floated the idea to a few well placed SF supervisors and was shocked who said "interesting idea" and who said "never in a million years" Exactly the opposite of what I thought. In fact, I'm considering funding an exploratory committee for feasibility.
We shall see. I love Indy as it is obviously Indy, but it's a changing world...