IBJNews

Governor's attorney mulling run for county prosecutor

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The chairman of the Marion County Republican party said Thursday that he would be “ecstatic” if Mark Massa, the attorney for Gov. Mitch Daniels, ran for county prosecutor.

The party is without a candidate after Helen Marchal, the chief adviser to current prosecutor Carl Brizzi, withdrew her candidacy on Tuesday. Brizzi announced Jan. 14 that he would not seek a third term.

Massa told IBJ on Thursday that he is “considering” running and said he would need to make a decision soon. The party’s Central Committee will meet Feb. 13 to slate party candidates for the fall ballot.

“Of the [Republican] candidates I know of right now, he’s far and away the most qualified,” said party Chairman Tom John, who already knew of Massa's interest in the position. “But obviously, he’s extremely important to the governor.”

Massa served as a deputy prosecutor under former Marion County prosecutors Steve Goldsmith and Jeff Modisett and for eight years was former prosecutor Scott Newman’s chief counsel. He left the U.S. Attorney’s office as a federal prosecutor in January 2006 to become Daniels’ general counsel.

John said at least a dozen prospects, ranging from judges to defense lawyers, have expressed interest in running as the Republican party’s candidate for county prosecutor.

“But I don’t know how serious they are, quite frankly,” he said.

Democrats have three active candidates vying for the position: County Assessor Greg Bowes; former State Rep. David Orentlicher; and Indianapolis attorney Terry Curry.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Massa unopposed
    According to the Secretary of State's website, Mark Massa will be running unopposed in the Republican primary. He also has a new website up, www.markmassa.com that is pretty interesting.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT