Healthy Indiana Plan expansion opposed by some

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana wants to use its public health savings account program for low-income adults to cover people who will become newly eligible for Medicaid under the federal health care law beginning in 2014, but federal officials haven't yet said whether they will allow the program to continue beyond next year.

State officials say they have pressed federal Medicaid officials for nearly a year to say whether the Healthy Indiana Plan, or HIP, can continue beyond the scheduled Dec. 31, 2012, expiration of a waiver that allows the state to divert Medicaid funds for the program.

"We've asked them for guidance, and we've really gotten no response," said Seema Verma, an Indiana Family and Social Services Administration consultant who helped design the Healthy Indiana Plan.

The administration now plans to ask the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services to approve an amended state plan that would allow the existing HIP program to cover Medicaid expansions required under the new federal law.

CMS spokeswoman Mary Kahn said the agency could not comment on the proposed amendment to Indiana's Medicaid plan until it's submitted. State officials say that could happen as early as the first week of April. CMS then has 60 days to respond.

Part of the state's dilemma is poor timing. HIP's Medicaid waiver expires a full year before the federal Medicaid expansion. But Indiana needs to make plans now for how it will enroll as many as 500,000 newly eligible recipients — whether it's in HIP, traditional Medicaid, or another program.

HIP currently provides about 45,000 enrollees up to $500 in free preventive care such as cancer screenings; a $1,100 medical savings account; and when medical costs exceed that, benefits of at least $300,000. Enrollees make monthly contributions based on their ability to pay, but many pay nothing at all because they earn too little.

Legislation pending in the General Assembly would require minimum monthly payments of $8.33 per month, or $100 annually.

A cost analysis by state actuary Milliman Inc. showed HIP would have to add some services not currently provided — including vision, dental and maternity benefits — to meet the requirements of the Medicaid expansion. The analysis shows the enhanced HIP would cost 44 percent more than traditional Medicaid, totaling $1.85 billion for 336,500 HIP enrollees during the first full year of the expansion.

Under the Medicaid expansion, the federal government pays all costs of the newly eligible enrollees for the first three years, while state shares grow incrementally to 10 percent by 2020.

Verma said HIP costs more in part because it pays doctors at higher rates so more participate. Also, HIP serves a population with more medical needs than the traditional Medicaid population.

Public health insurance advocate David Roos of Covering Kids and Families of Indiana said HIP enrollees also have pent-up medical needs after going for years without health insurance.

"Some very, very sick people are using the program. That's why it's so expensive," Roos said.

The Family and Social Services Administration said the program reduces costly emergency room visits and nearly 80 percent of enrollees take advantage of free preventive services.

While some conservatives and health care policy experts have praised HIP as an innovative state solution for the uninsured, others say the program would not work as a vehicle for the federal Medicaid expansion. The state plans to hold a public hearing on the proposal Wednesday at the Indiana Government Center South in Indianapolis.

Indianapolis attorney Fran Quigley, who has represented clients who have had trouble enrolling or staying enrolled in HIP, acknowledged the program provides a coverage option to low-income, uninsured adults. But he said it is no substitute for Medicaid, which he called more effective and affordable.

He said requiring enrollees to make even small contributions to their plans, as HIP does, violates the spirit and the letter of the federal health care overhaul law.

"If you charge poor families a premium for health coverage, it means some of the most struggling Hoosiers will go without health care," Quigley said.

Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels wrote Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius in January asking that CMS not reject the state plan amendment over the required contributions.

"HIP was implemented with bi-partisan support in the Indiana General Assembly and reflects the values of our state," Daniels wrote. "Indiana prefers to promote this program that contains consumer-focused incentives for personal responsibility instead of a traditional Medicaid entitlement program."


  • Not true
    Hip is absolutely affordable and that lady you spoke to was wrong. The most you'd pay is $100 per month and that's for full coverage, no deductible, and prescriptions are free. Where else can you get that at a better price. Sheesh.
  • HIP is a joke
    For more than two years I tried to get my daughter enrolled in HIP because I lost my health insurance when I lost my job. When I checked to see how much it would cost for a buy-in, the woman I spoke to told me that honestly the plan is expensive and I could probably find the same or better coverage myself--pretty pathetic when the people who know the plan won't recommend it.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. to mention the rest of Molly's experience- she served as Communications Director for the Indianapolis Department of Public Works and also did communications for the state. She's incredibly qualified for this role and has a real love for Indianapolis and Indiana. Best of luck to her!

    2. Shall we not demand the same scrutiny for law schools, med schools, heaven forbid, business schools, etc.? How many law school grads are servers? How many business start ups fail and how many business grads get low paying jobs because there are so few high paying positions available? Why does our legislature continue to demean public schools and give taxpayer dollars to charters and private schools, ($171 million last year), rather than investing in our community schools? We are on a course of disaster regarding our public school attitudes unless we change our thinking in a short time.

    3. I agree with the other reader's comment about the chunky tomato soup. I found myself wanting a breadstick to dip into it. It tasted more like a marinara sauce; I couldn't eat it as a soup. In general, I liked the place... but doubt that I'll frequent it once the novelty wears off.

    4. The Indiana toll road used to have some of the cleanest bathrooms you could find on the road. After the lease they went downhill quickly. While not the grossest you'll see, they hover a bit below average. Am not sure if this is indicative of the entire deal or merely a portion of it. But the goals of anyone taking over the lease will always be at odds. The fewer repairs they make, the more money they earn since they have a virtual monopoly on travel from Cleveland to Chicago. So they only comply to satisfy the rules. It's hard to hand public works over to private enterprise. The incentives are misaligned. In true competition, you'd have multiple roads, each build by different companies motivated to make theirs more attractive. Working to attract customers is very different than working to maximize profit on people who have no choice but to choose your road. Of course, we all know two roads would be even more ridiculous.

    5. The State is in a perfect position. The consortium overpaid for leasing the toll road. Good for the State. The money they paid is being used across the State to upgrade roads and bridges and employ people at at time most of the country is scrambling to fund basic repairs. Good for the State. Indiana taxpayers are no longer subsidizing the toll roads to the tune of millions a year as we had for the last 20 years because the legislature did not have the guts to raise tolls. Good for the State. If the consortium fails, they either find another operator, acceptable to the State, to buy them out or the road gets turned back over to the State and we keep the Billions. Good for the State. Pat Bauer is no longer the Majority or Minority Leader of the House. Good for the State. Anyway you look at this, the State received billions of dollars for an assett the taxpayers were subsidizing, the State does not have to pay to maintain the road for 70 years. I am having trouble seeing the downside.