HHGregg's CFO to depart in January

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The chief financial officer of Indianapolis-based retailer HHGregg Inc. has resigned, effective Jan. 31, to take a similar position with another firm, the company announced Thursday.

Jeremy J. Aguilar, 39, has been CFO for the electronics and appliances chain since 2009. The company intends to elevate Andrew S. Giesler, senior vice president of finance, to interim CFO, but will also initiate a search for Aguilar’s permanent replacement.

It was not immediately clear where Aguilar plans to work next. He did not return a call from IBJ on Thursday morning.

"I would like to thank Jeremy for his leadership and many contributions to HHGregg over the past eight years,” said President and CEO Dennis May in a prepared statement. “Jeremy has been an instrumental member of our leadership team and helped support the growth of the company's store base as we work toward becoming a national retailer.”

Gregg currently operates 228 stores in 20 states across the eastern half of the U.S.

The firm embarked on an aggressive expansion plan over the last decade, which was slowed by the economic downturn. As the electronics category has cooled, executives have tried to rebalance the stores’ product mix to other home products, such as appliances.

The firm’s strategy appeared to give Wall Street more confidence. HHGregg shares shot up in 2013, rising from $7.27 at the start of the year to as high as $20.75 in September. They since have fallen back to about $15.00.

Shares declined another 3 percent on Thursday morning to $14.50.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.