Hostess prepares to open plant despite tax-break question

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Hostess Brands LLC is taking steps toward re-opening its Indianapolis plant well ahead of a city commission approving its requested tax abatement on $10 million in new equipment.

The Metropolitan Development Commission is scheduled to vote on the abatement request July 3, but the company already has started hiring and is testing and inspecting equipment, said Ryan Hunt, senior project manager in the Department of Metropolitan Development.

new version of hostess 15col photoThe plant at 2929 Shadeland Ave. has started hiring, and its parking lot is often nearly full. (IBJ Photo)

The activity is obvious, as the plant’s parking lot at 2929 Shadeland Ave., recently repaved and striped, is nearly full during daytime hours. Workers wearing hard hats and white coveralls can be see going in and out. The firm's tax abatement request said that the east-side facility could employ up to 145 people.

Hostess Brands spokeswoman Hannah Arnold said no one from the company was available to comment on its plans for Indianapolis. It is not immediately clear when the plant would start production or whether the equipment covered in the abatement request already has been purchased.

Department of Metropolitan Development staff has recommended approving the abatement, determining that the new investment in equipment wouldn't be economically feasible for Hostess without it. The tax break on personal property taxes would be worth up to $536,220 over eight years.

Hunt said the company should remain eligible for the tax break, despite the activity already under way at the plant. The Metropolitan Development Commission doesn't usually grant abatements on existing equipment, but can do so by waiving a statutory prohibition.

The MDC recently granted two 10-year abatements worth $30.6 million to Eli Lilly and Co., which because of an unexpected procedural delay already has installed some the equipment that's part of a $400 million upgrade and expansion of a facility southwest of downtown, Hunt said.

The MDC ends up waiving the statutory prohibition on abatements for existing equipment a couple of times a year, Hunt said. Hostess doesn’t plan to install the new equipment in the Indianapolis plant before July 3, he said.

Hostess announced in April its plans to re-open the Indianapolis facility  but didn’t apply for the abatement until May 28. The new company, owned by private-equity firms Apollo Global Management and Metropolis & Co., bought five factories out of bankruptcy in March and has received taxpayer-funded incentives in Columbus, Ga., and Emporia, Kan.

In Schiller Park, Ill., Hostess started cranking out cupcakes again without discussing tax abatements with village officials, Village Manager Kevin Barr said.  

The company has said it would have Twinkies back on store shelves by July 15, but those are not made in the Indianapolis plant, which in the past produced buns, mini doughnuts and muffins.

The nine-member MDC isn’t likely to question whether Hostess needs the abatement to make re-opening feasible, because members would hesitate to pull the rug out from under a company that proceeded with its plans based on a positive recommendation from MDC staff , said outgoing president Ed Mahern.

Mahern and Cornelius Brown will lose their seats on the commission after July 1, under a new state law that expands the mayor of Indianapolis’ budget authority and gives him five out of nine appointments on the MDC. Mahern and Brown were appointed by the county commissioners, but after July 1 the mayor and City-County Council will split those seats.  


  • Experts on every business plan
    From the article: Department of Metropolitan Development staff has recommended approving the abatement, determining that the new investment in equipment wouldn't be economically feasible for Hostess without it. Right. Because the DMD has staff that are experts in the field of industrial baking. As if they've seen every dollar amount in the Hostess business plan and have determined that an average yearly property tax break of $67,000/year is just the right amount to result in a reasonable rate of return for the revived Hostess operation. Nonsense! The DMD staff is recommending approval of it because the real power brokers at Develop Indy told them to. The Develop Indy folks are probably supporting it because Hostess v.2.0 hired a consultant/lobbyist who formerly worked for Develop Indy. That's how this works. The fact that they are already proceeding with the investments before the MDC considers should prove that they don't need it. Mahern's statement about not pulling out the rug is proof of how little independent evaluation occurs during the MDC hearings.
  • Yo Ding Dongs!
    So for all the people blaming "da unions' fault" for the original closing: You going to step up and pay the corporate welfare tax break for the "right to work" state, as long as the rights stay within the boardroom paychecks?
  • oh Yeah
    Super. Tax breaks for food products that feed the fatties across the country; we all pay for resulting health issues. I need a cigarette and bacon - how proud...
  • Hostess
    Now that this is a "right to work" state they will start over with employees who are desperate for jobs, even if those come at much lower pay. More for corporate, less for the worker on the floor.
  • Hostess
    Either the business plan makes sense without the "tax breaks" or it should just fail on it's own. It would be unfortunate to bail out the employees who chose not to work and draw unemployment.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. why oh why does this state continue to elect these people....do you wonder how much was graft out of the 3.8 billion?

  2. i too think this is a great idea. I think the vision and need is there as well. But also agree with Wendy that there may be better location in our city to fulfill this vision and help grow the sports of hockey and figure skating in Indy. Also to help further develop other parts of the city that seem often forgotten. Any of the other 6 townships out side of the three northernmost could benefit greatly from a facility and a vision like this. For a vision that sounds philanthropic, the location is appears more about the money. Would really like to see it elsewhere, but still wish the development the best of luck, as we can always use more ice in the city. As for the Ice growth when they return, if schedules can be coordinated with the Fuel, what could be better than to have high level hockey available to go see every weekend of the season? Good luck with the development and the return of the Ice.

  3. How many parking spaces do they have at Ironworks? Will residents have reserved spaces or will they have to troll for a space among the people that are there at Ruth Chris & Sangiovese?

  4. You do not get speeding ticket first time you speed and this is not first time Mr.Page has speed. One act should not define a man and this one act won't. He got off with a slap on the wrist. I agree with judge no person was injured by his actions. The state was robbed of money by paying too much rent for a building and that money could have been used for social services. The Page family maybe "generous" with their money but for most part all of it is dirty money that he obtained for sources that are not on the upright. Page is the kind of lawyer that gives lawyers a bad name. He paid off this judge like he has many other tine and walked away. Does he still have his license. I believe so. Hire him to get you confiscated drug money back. He will. It will cost you.

  5. I remain amazed at the level of expertise of the average Internet Television Executive. Obviously they have all the answers and know the business inside and out.