IEDC unveils statewide entrepreneurship initiative

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

With the 21 Fund—the state’s principal initiative to invest in high-tech companies—facing another year of lean funding from the Indiana General Assembly, state economic development leaders Thursday unveiled a not-for-profit entity that could attract additional funding sources.

Elevate Ventures could draw an additional $30 million in matching federal and private funding to support entrepreneurs statewide, Indiana Economic Development Corp. officials say.

The new entrepreneurship initiative, which broadly will go by the name Invest Indiana, also would match promising firms with experienced entrepreneurs and investors to provide needed advice to grow their firms.

Indiana “lacks a statewide investor network to match new ventures with industry investors to increase the probability of success,” says informational materials from the IEDC, which was scheduled to announce the new initiative Thursday in Winona Lake in northern Indiana.

Officials said investors who interact with their portfolio companies at least twice a month by mentoring, coaching and providing leads greatly enhance the probability of success.

One idea is creating a “robust” entrepreneurs-in-residence program.

The 21st Century Research and Technology Fund, by contrast, is more about writing checks to promising companies.

The Daniels administration is seeking $31 million for the 21 Fund in this legislative session, compared with $35 million it landed for the current two-year period and $70 million in 2007-2009. 

Last month, Indiana Secretary of Commerce Mitchell Roob Jr. cited continuing state budget pressures for the modest 21 Fund request. He told IBJ the administration was focused on a balanced budget and not raising taxes.

In recent years, IEDC officials who manage the 21 Fund have been trying to stretch dwindling grant amounts by trying to get angel investors and venture capitalists to invest in firms alongside the 21 Fund.

The not-for-profit structure of the state’s new Elevate Ventures makes it eligible to capture federal and private dollars in ways the 21 Fund—which will continue—cannot.

IEDC officials pointed to the success of a not-for-profit from northeast Ohio, known as Jumpstart Inc. It partnered with the U.S. Economic Development Administration and two private foundations to attract $1.3 million. That money is being used to develop regional entrepreneurial action plans in northern Indiana.

The plan is for Elevate to strike similar kinds of partnerships to help companies statewide.

“We need to make sure that the current innovators of the next Biomet, ExactTarget or Cook have the early state support and capital they need to accelerate their growth here versus in Massachusetts, California or even China,” Kip Tom, an IEDC board member, said in a written statement.

The initiative helps address two fundamental needs for emerging businesses, said Jim Jay, CEO of the technology initiative TechPoint.

One is that it provides a way for investors to network together to invest in promising firms. The other big element is that it gives companies access to mentors at critical stages of a company’s development.

“I think that’s one of the key elements to this,” Jay said. “It’s great that the IEDC is willing to be innovative.”



  • More Questions Than Answers
    Who will lead this new organization?

    Who are the board members?

    What is the size of the staff and salaries?

    What is it's current budget and what are the sources of funds?

    What are they going to do that is not already done by the IEDC's current non profit foundation, 21st Century Fund, Indiana Investment Fund, Biocrossroad's Fund of Funds, CICP organization and its Halo Group, the statewide network of Small Business Development Centers, Small Business Administration, or the failed Indiana Venture Center?

    When will they have their first public meeting?

    Why is the 21st Century Fund budget cut and this new organization funded to basically write ANOTHER expensive report/plan with no real money or actual programs that do anything?

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?