IBJNews

IEDC unveils statewide entrepreneurship initiative

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

With the 21 Fund—the state’s principal initiative to invest in high-tech companies—facing another year of lean funding from the Indiana General Assembly, state economic development leaders Thursday unveiled a not-for-profit entity that could attract additional funding sources.

Elevate Ventures could draw an additional $30 million in matching federal and private funding to support entrepreneurs statewide, Indiana Economic Development Corp. officials say.

The new entrepreneurship initiative, which broadly will go by the name Invest Indiana, also would match promising firms with experienced entrepreneurs and investors to provide needed advice to grow their firms.

Indiana “lacks a statewide investor network to match new ventures with industry investors to increase the probability of success,” says informational materials from the IEDC, which was scheduled to announce the new initiative Thursday in Winona Lake in northern Indiana.

Officials said investors who interact with their portfolio companies at least twice a month by mentoring, coaching and providing leads greatly enhance the probability of success.

One idea is creating a “robust” entrepreneurs-in-residence program.

The 21st Century Research and Technology Fund, by contrast, is more about writing checks to promising companies.

The Daniels administration is seeking $31 million for the 21 Fund in this legislative session, compared with $35 million it landed for the current two-year period and $70 million in 2007-2009. 

Last month, Indiana Secretary of Commerce Mitchell Roob Jr. cited continuing state budget pressures for the modest 21 Fund request. He told IBJ the administration was focused on a balanced budget and not raising taxes.

In recent years, IEDC officials who manage the 21 Fund have been trying to stretch dwindling grant amounts by trying to get angel investors and venture capitalists to invest in firms alongside the 21 Fund.

The not-for-profit structure of the state’s new Elevate Ventures makes it eligible to capture federal and private dollars in ways the 21 Fund—which will continue—cannot.

IEDC officials pointed to the success of a not-for-profit from northeast Ohio, known as Jumpstart Inc. It partnered with the U.S. Economic Development Administration and two private foundations to attract $1.3 million. That money is being used to develop regional entrepreneurial action plans in northern Indiana.

The plan is for Elevate to strike similar kinds of partnerships to help companies statewide.

“We need to make sure that the current innovators of the next Biomet, ExactTarget or Cook have the early state support and capital they need to accelerate their growth here versus in Massachusetts, California or even China,” Kip Tom, an IEDC board member, said in a written statement.

The initiative helps address two fundamental needs for emerging businesses, said Jim Jay, CEO of the technology initiative TechPoint.

One is that it provides a way for investors to network together to invest in promising firms. The other big element is that it gives companies access to mentors at critical stages of a company’s development.

“I think that’s one of the key elements to this,” Jay said. “It’s great that the IEDC is willing to be innovative.”

 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • More Questions Than Answers
    Who will lead this new organization?

    Who are the board members?

    What is the size of the staff and salaries?

    What is it's current budget and what are the sources of funds?

    What are they going to do that is not already done by the IEDC's current non profit foundation, 21st Century Fund, Indiana Investment Fund, Biocrossroad's Fund of Funds, CICP organization and its Halo Group, the statewide network of Small Business Development Centers, Small Business Administration, or the failed Indiana Venture Center?

    When will they have their first public meeting?

    Why is the 21st Century Fund budget cut and this new organization funded to basically write ANOTHER expensive report/plan with no real money or actual programs that do anything?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT