IBJNews

Indiana Amtrak riders suggest more frequent trains

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Some riders say Amtrak's passenger service between Chicago and Indianapolis would be more popular if there were more frequent options for catching a train.

Federal funding cuts are prompting Amtrak to end in October the four-day-a-week Hoosier State route, which makes stops in Crawfordsville, Lafayette, Rensselaer and Dyer. Amtrak's three-day-a-week Cardinal line running from Chicago through Indianapolis to the East Coast will continue.

Cory Reynard of Lafayette, who traveled the Hoosier State train to Chicago last week, told the Journal & Courier of Lafayette that it's less expensive to use Amtrak than driving, but he was surprised that only one train headed to Chicago in the morning and one back at night.

State officials are studying the estimated $4 million to $5 million a year it might cost to continue the Hoosier State service. Starting Oct. 1, the federal government no longer plans to provide funding for Amtrak routes of less than 750 miles.

The Hoosier State route runs less than 200 miles and carries on average about 120 passengers per trip, but it can handle up to 270. The train takes about five hours to travel from Indianapolis to Chicago, compared to three hours by car.

Before the Indiana Legislature adjourned last month, state Sen. Brandt Hershman, R-Lafayette, added provisions to the state budget bill allowing Indiana's highway department to fund the rail service.

The key is to increase ridership and help the route pay for itself, Hershman said. An engineering consultant is evaluating what steps the state could take.

Kristin Cleven of West Lafayette said she rides the Hoosier State when she's not traveling with her family. Cleven, who grew up in Norway, said she values mass transit and uses it when she can.

"I wish there were more frequent trains and faster trains where Amtrak had priority," Cleven said. "The train is usually on time but sometimes it's delayed one hour waiting for a freight train. That's not good if you have an appointment or a flight to make."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Megabus Is A Parasite
    Megabus is parasite operation because it uses public highways, without which it could not operate. More egregiously, it also has a bad habit of stopping at facilities used by Amtrak and commuter agencies without paying the cost of using them. Megabus passengers have used restroom and other facilities at Chicago's Union Station and asked Amtrak agents questions, keeping the latter form serving their own customers. Megabus has its place, but its not a panacea and it's important that everyone understand their business model. They could not be profitable if they did not mooch off others' assets.
  • It Is Easy When You Do It Correctly
    Tom, First, your calculations are wrong since you are assuming that everyone makes a round trip on the Hoosier State. And that is far from correct. Many people don't make a round trip on the Hoosier State. Many people may leave on the Hoosier, but they return on the Cardinal which runs on the other 3 days per week. Or vice-versa, they leave on the Card and return on the Hoosier. Second, what you should be worried about is what do the subsidies do your wallet. According to the Taxpayer's Receipt for 2009, a married couple with 2 kids and $80K in income watched $110.06 of their Federal income tax dollars go into the highways. That same couple watched $3.83 of their Federal income tax dollars go to Amtrak. We're talking about the price of a gallon of gas vs. a weeks worth of groceries for some families. A retired couple with $100K in income watched $3.11 of their Federal income tax dollars go to Amtrak. They watched $89.38 go to the highways, even if they can no longer drive a car, much less own one. And that's just subsidies to the Interstate Highways! Most local streets are paved largely with property taxes; not fuel taxes. If we drivers had to actually pay 100% of the costs of our roads, Amtrak wouldn't need any subsidies. They could raise the price of the tickets and still be cheaper than driving. As of 2010, we drivers only managed to cover 42% of the costs of our highways. Amtrak managed to cover 68% of its costs in 2012 without help from the Fed.
  • subsidy per passenger
    This is easy – take the annual subsidy, 5 million, and divide it by ridership which is 120 people per round trip, 4 days a week, 52 weeks a year. That is $200 per round trip which is totally absurd.
    • Subsidies are subsidies
      What does it matter if the subsidy is direct or indirect? Roads cost money, fuel taxes no longer cover all of the costs to construct and maintain them, and we all pay for roads that we don't use.
    • @IndyMoon
      "Amtrak trains have a restroom. And continued investment in the train system makes sense as the highways become increasingly more congested. Has anyone driven Chicago during the rush hour recently?" Alas, I have been stuck in Chicago traffic, rush hour or no, many times. And there were many occasions when it would have been a tremendous relief to be able to get up and go to the bathroom as is possible in a train (or Megabus) rather than remaining trapped in my vehicle, hoping against hope that I won't need reconstructive surgery on my bladder.
    • Amtrak
      Amtrak trains have a restroom. And continued investment in the train system makes sense as the highways become increasingly more congested. Has anyone driven Chicago during the rush hour recently?
      • Really?
        "The Megabus also has a restroom." And Amtrak trains don't?
      • Megabus or Amtrack
        You will notice I used the adjective "directly" before the word "subsidized". The point I am trying to make is that the Megabus appears be a much more economical way to get to Chicago on public transportation than Amtrack and you don't have to shell out additional funds directly to Amtrack to subsidize it.
        • MegaBus absolutely is subsidized
          Those roads it drives on? They didn't build them. Those pick-up and drop-off points that they don't pay anything for? That's another subsidy.
          • Amtrak Stations
            Bring back the old Fairview and Ben Davis stations like they had during the TH,I&E/Vandalia Railroad eara!
          • Amtrak Great, But. .
            My husband and I have done the Hoosier State round trip to Chicago several times as we traveled to Seattle. The limited times coming and going are quite a challenge, especially since there is no long term parking near the station. If there were more choices and slightly improved times, I think it would make a world of difference. We do love Amtrak to Chicago!
          • Megabus has restroom too
            The Megabus also has a restroom.
            • Megabus or Amtrak
              The Megabus picks you up on the South side of the City County Building, has multiple departure times to Chicago during the day, has nice wide seats, free wifi, get you there faster than the train and drops you off a 1/2 block from Union Station, and I presume is cheaper. Did I mention it is not directly subsidized by the government?
              • Wishing for a high speed line to Chi-town
                I would absolutely love to take a train to Chicago for weekend trips. Various factors though have kept from actually trying it: too slow, very few departures (usually at inconvenient times), expensive for what you get. What I really want to see is a nice high speed rail put in that left more often. Maybe it's a pipe dream, but I'd love to see it sometime in my lifetime.
              • Always blown away
                When the anti-public-transit crowd howls that "nobody uses the train service that's there!" without mentioning that it leaves at the most ridiculous time of day, and returns at the most ridiculous time of day. It isn't enough to "preserve" the Hoosier State run--if its to actually be a useful public accomodation we need to improve it by having runs at times of day when people might actually ride the train.
              • I have ridden the train several times and love it. To be able to go to Chicago without having to worry about parking, traffic and gas is a huge benefit. My biggest issue is the lack of frequent trains. It is a case of chicken and egg. I believe more frequent trains that leave several times a day will draw more ridership. Adding high speed trains would make it much more user friendly as it would make for a quicker trip than by car. As much as the State spends millions to subsidize highways, spending a few million to continue the rail would be a good investment.

                Post a comment to this story

                COMMENTS POLICY
                We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
                 
                You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
                 
                Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
                 
                No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
                 
                We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
                 

                Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

                Sponsored by
                ADVERTISEMENT

                facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

                Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
                Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
                 
                Subscribe to IBJ
                1. Socialized medicine works great for white people in Scandanavia. It works well in Costa Rica for a population that is partly white and partly mestizo. I don't really see Obamacare as something aimed against whites. I think that is a Republican canard designed to elicit support from white people for republican candidates who don't care about them any more than democrats care about the non-whites they pander to with their phony maneuvers. But what is different between Costa Rica nd the Scandanavian nations on one hand and the US on the other? SIZE. Maybe the US is just too damn big. Maybe it just needs to be divided into smaller self governing pieces like when the old Holy Roman Empire was dismantled. Maybe we are always trying the same set of solutions for different kinds of people as if we were all the same. Oh-- I know-- that is liberal dogma, that we are all the same. Which is the most idiotic American notion going right back to the propaganda of 1776. All men are different and their differences are myriad and that which is different is not equal. The state which pretends men are all the same is going to force men to be the same. That is what America does here, that is what we do in our stupid overseas wars, that is how we destroy true diversity and true difference, and we are all as different groups of folks, feeling the pains of how capitalism is grinding us down into equally insignificant proletarian microconsumers with no other identity whether we like it or not. And the Marxists had this much right about the War of Independence: it was fundamentally a war of capitalist against feudal systems. America has been about big money since day one and whatever gets in the way is crushed. Health care is just another market and Obamacare, to the extent that it Rationalizes and makes more uniform a market which should actually be really different in nature and delivery from place to place-- well that will serve the interests of the biggest capitalist stakeholders in health care which is not Walmart for Gosh Sakes it is the INSURANCE INDUSTRY. CUI BONO Obamacare? The insurance industry. So republicans drop the delusion pro capitalist scales from your eyes this has almost nothing to do with race or "socialism" it has to do mostly with what the INSURANCE INDUSTRY wants to have happen in order to make their lives and profits easier.

                2. Read the article - the reason they can't justify staying is they have too many medicare/medicaid patients and the re-imbursements for transporting these patient is so low.

                3. I would not vote for Bayh if he did run. I also wouldn't vote for Pence. My guess is that Bayh does not have the stomach to oppose persons on the far left or far right. Also, outside of capitalizing on his time as U. S. Senator (and his wife's time as a board member to several companies) I don't know if he is willing to fight for anything. If people who claim to be in the middle walk away from fights with the right and left wing, what are we left with? Extremes. It's probably best for Bayh if he does not have the stomach for the fight but the result is no middle ground.

                4. JK - I meant that the results don't ring true. I also questioned the 10-year-old study because so much in the "health care system" has changed since the study was made. Moreover, it was hard to get to any overall conclusion or observation with the article. But....don't be defensive given my comments; I still think you do the best job of any journalist in the area shedding light and insight on important health care issues.

                5. Probably a good idea he doesn't run. I for one do not want someone who lives in VIRGINIA to be the governor. He gave it some thought, but he likes Virginia too much. What a name I cannot say on this site! The way these people think and operate amuses me.

                ADVERTISEMENT