IBJNews

Indiana joins Feds in reviewing merger of Sysco, US Foods

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Sysco Corp.’s agreement to buy US Foods for $3.5 billion is being reviewed for its effect on competition by federal and regulators in some states, including Indiana..

Houston-based Sysco, with annual revenue of about $44 billion, is the top operator in the U.S. food distribution business. Adding No. 2 US Foods would create a corporation in charge of at least a quarter of the $235 billion North American market.

The companies’ deal, announced last month, will be reviewed by the Justice Department’s antitrust division or the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, said Gina Talamona, a Justice Department spokeswoman. A decision hasn’t been made about which agency will conduct the investigation, she said Thursday.

Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller also is looking at the deal, said Bryan Corbin, his spokesman.

“We are aware of the merger and are working with other states as we examine the potential impact in Indiana,” Corbin said. He declined to identify any other states involved or comment on details of the review.

In a prepared statement, Florida also said it was participating in a "multistate group that is currently reviewing this merger."

Sysco is already North America’s biggest distributor of food to restaurants. Rosemont, Ill.-based US Foods would add brands including Cattleman’s Selection meat and Devonshire desserts. The combined companies would have about $65 billion in annual sales.

In announcing their agreement to combine businesses, Sysco and closely-held US Foods said the merger would create a “world class foodservice company.”

US Foods operates a large distribution center in Fishers. Sysco has a large warehouse at 4000 W. 62nd St., in Indianapolis.

Sysco has obtained a $4.75 billion financing commitment from Goldman Sachs Group Inc. to fund the transaction. It’s paying $3 billion in common stock and $500 million in cash to US Food owners including private-equity firms KKR & Co. and Clayton, Dubilier & Rice LLC.

Charley Wilson, a spokesman for Houston-based Sysco, said in an e-mailed statement that the company knew the review was under way.

“We are aware that several states have asked to participate in the antitrust review process,” he said. “This is common practice in mergers involving companies that operate in several geographic areas.”

Sysco operates in a “highly competitive and fragmented space,” he said. Merging with US Foods will enable Sysco to take “meaningful cost” out of the system, making the company more competitive, he said.

Lisa Lecas and Michelle Calcagni, spokeswomen for US Foods, didn’t immediately respond after regular business hours to e-mail messages seeking comment on the review.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • jobs?
    How will this merger affect the local labor? Will it bring layoffs of drivers or warehouse employees?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT