ISTEP breaches spur closer look at testing

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Rising concerns about cheating on Indiana's standardized tests have prompted the state Department of Education to keep closer tabs on how the test is administered, including evaluating the number of erased answers for clues about whether the results may have been manipulated by teachers.

The number of investigations into testing irregularities increased to 19 this year, according to The Journal Gazette in Fort Wayne. Those include the biggest breach ever of the ISTEP+ test in March, when an eighth-grade essay question was posted on Facebook. More than 80,000 students around the state had their results on that item tossed in a case that involved teachers in three districts.

In other cases, teachers allegedly used live test items to practice with students, created practice problems that matched test questions, taught lessons specifically geared to test questions or told students to change their answers.

Educators say the rising suspicions may reflect a heightened importance for the test scores, which now affect teacher pay, graduation rates and even whether the state will take over failing schools.

"If you can't perform on (the test), you're in trouble, basically," said Stephen Gabet, a newly retired teacher and member of the State Board of Education. "That has unfortunately put pressure on people."

Local districts usually investigate cheating allegations and handle punishment. But Gabet said the education board recently gave the department permission to create rules on testing security.

"The test means so much now that we are watching a little more closely," said Wes Bruce, the state's chief assessment officer.

A growing concern is the number of erasures in which an answer is switched from wrong to right. Such incidents have been problematic in districts across the country, including in Washington, D.C.

Erasures are defined as graphite appearing on more than one testing bubble. They don't always indicate cheating — in some cases, a student may have lightly crossed out wrong answers to eliminate them or misnumbered the answer sheet. Scanners pick up the remaining graphite.

But an analysis of Indiana's state's 2009-10 ISTEP+ tests showed almost 4 percent of the state's schools were flagged for having at least one classroom with an excessive number of answers that were changed from wrong to right.

Those included a third-grade English/language arts class in which 23 students out of 25 accounted for 126 erasures. Of those, 104 were answers changed from wrong to right.

In another case, all 20 students in a third-grade math class had at least one erasure. All but four of the 125 erasures changed answers from wrong to right.

Nate Schnellenberger, president of the Indiana State Teachers Association, acknowledged that teachers are feeling more pressure to perform. But he said that doesn't translate into "widespread cheating."

Bruce agreed that most Indiana schools were well within statistical boundaries and cautioned against jumping to conclusions.

"My concerns are it's statistical and not clear-cut," he said. "We didn't want to be on a witch hunt. We don't know that that teacher actually cheated."

He said about 90 of the state's 2,400 schools were sent informational notices about questionable classes.

Steven Yager, superintendent of Southwest Allen County Schools, said one of Southwest's best teachers was flagged for having high erasures. An internal analysis showed the teacher regularly prompted children to use extra time to review answers and that the principal proctored with that teacher the day of the test.

Though that teacher wasn't involved in cheating, Yager said the erasure analysis is probably beneficial.

"When teachers know it's a possibility, they will toe the line," Yager said. "Maybe we should have been doing this all along."


  • Problem
    Two big problems with standardized testing:
    1. they are not a good gage of a teacher or a student (who recieves no benefit for trying on a test)
    2. Great, now our teachers are cheating and stressing a test rather than strait up focus on our children. Thanks again big brother (i.e. government)
  • .... oh, *facepalm*

    ... I wish IBJ had an editing tool. XD
  • As a former stuident--
    While I normally (and usually) don't condone cheating, I completely understand why teachers feel the need to 'breach' ISTEP testing procedures. Their jobs now rely on their students' scores-- and no teacher is a miracle worker. I spent my whole life in various Indiana school systems, graduating in 2000, and I pity any teacher whose job security is based on the testing scores of the kinds of students I had the misfortune to be in classrooms with. I wish the parents of such students would be held accountable for their stupidity but that's an impossible wish. The blame will forever be placed at teachers' feet and then everyone acts surprised when teachers commit desperate acts like the ones mentioned in this article.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. What became of this project? Anyone know?

    2. Scott, could you post an enlarged photo of the exterior of the building? This will be a great addition to Walnut Street. This area will only continue to develop with additions like this. Also, please give us more updates on the "Cultural Trail light" expansion. Also a great move for the city, as long as there is maintenance money set aside.

    3. Great story IBJ! Citizens don't have a real sense of the financial magnitude of supporting Indy's sports and tourism sector. The CIB was a brilliant idea for creating a highly integrated public-private partnership to support this sector from the economic activity it generates. Unfortunately, most folks think the benefits of that economic activity accrue directly to the City budget, and it doesn't. So though the CIB is facing lean times (covering its costs while maintaining minimally acceptable reserves), the City is operating with deficit - less tax revenue than expenses each year - with a very fragile reserve balance. That's why it's so challenging for the City to fund basic needs or new intitatives (e.g. pre-k education; new jail), and some credit rating agencies have downgraded Indy from it's past stellar AAA status. More reporting on City finances would be welcomed.

    4. Sure, I'll admit that it bugs me to see that the IBJ.COM censors it's blog posts almost as much as the D of I does when someone points out the falsehoods and fabrications. _____But I think it bothers me almost as much that Captain/Defender/Disciple get his yanked too. You see, those of us with a sense of integrity, humanity, compassion, and a need for fact based opinion WANT to see all of his screeds posted. It makes our point so much better than we can do it ourselves.

    5. We're conflating two very different topics. Voter fraud is a myth and excessive gun violence is all too real. I just hope rational gunowners decide to stop being shouted down by the, well, let's call them "less rational" ones.