ISTEP breaches spur closer look at testing

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Rising concerns about cheating on Indiana's standardized tests have prompted the state Department of Education to keep closer tabs on how the test is administered, including evaluating the number of erased answers for clues about whether the results may have been manipulated by teachers.

The number of investigations into testing irregularities increased to 19 this year, according to The Journal Gazette in Fort Wayne. Those include the biggest breach ever of the ISTEP+ test in March, when an eighth-grade essay question was posted on Facebook. More than 80,000 students around the state had their results on that item tossed in a case that involved teachers in three districts.

In other cases, teachers allegedly used live test items to practice with students, created practice problems that matched test questions, taught lessons specifically geared to test questions or told students to change their answers.

Educators say the rising suspicions may reflect a heightened importance for the test scores, which now affect teacher pay, graduation rates and even whether the state will take over failing schools.

"If you can't perform on (the test), you're in trouble, basically," said Stephen Gabet, a newly retired teacher and member of the State Board of Education. "That has unfortunately put pressure on people."

Local districts usually investigate cheating allegations and handle punishment. But Gabet said the education board recently gave the department permission to create rules on testing security.

"The test means so much now that we are watching a little more closely," said Wes Bruce, the state's chief assessment officer.

A growing concern is the number of erasures in which an answer is switched from wrong to right. Such incidents have been problematic in districts across the country, including in Washington, D.C.

Erasures are defined as graphite appearing on more than one testing bubble. They don't always indicate cheating — in some cases, a student may have lightly crossed out wrong answers to eliminate them or misnumbered the answer sheet. Scanners pick up the remaining graphite.

But an analysis of Indiana's state's 2009-10 ISTEP+ tests showed almost 4 percent of the state's schools were flagged for having at least one classroom with an excessive number of answers that were changed from wrong to right.

Those included a third-grade English/language arts class in which 23 students out of 25 accounted for 126 erasures. Of those, 104 were answers changed from wrong to right.

In another case, all 20 students in a third-grade math class had at least one erasure. All but four of the 125 erasures changed answers from wrong to right.

Nate Schnellenberger, president of the Indiana State Teachers Association, acknowledged that teachers are feeling more pressure to perform. But he said that doesn't translate into "widespread cheating."

Bruce agreed that most Indiana schools were well within statistical boundaries and cautioned against jumping to conclusions.

"My concerns are it's statistical and not clear-cut," he said. "We didn't want to be on a witch hunt. We don't know that that teacher actually cheated."

He said about 90 of the state's 2,400 schools were sent informational notices about questionable classes.

Steven Yager, superintendent of Southwest Allen County Schools, said one of Southwest's best teachers was flagged for having high erasures. An internal analysis showed the teacher regularly prompted children to use extra time to review answers and that the principal proctored with that teacher the day of the test.

Though that teacher wasn't involved in cheating, Yager said the erasure analysis is probably beneficial.

"When teachers know it's a possibility, they will toe the line," Yager said. "Maybe we should have been doing this all along."


  • Problem
    Two big problems with standardized testing:
    1. they are not a good gage of a teacher or a student (who recieves no benefit for trying on a test)
    2. Great, now our teachers are cheating and stressing a test rather than strait up focus on our children. Thanks again big brother (i.e. government)
  • .... oh, *facepalm*

    ... I wish IBJ had an editing tool. XD
  • As a former stuident--
    While I normally (and usually) don't condone cheating, I completely understand why teachers feel the need to 'breach' ISTEP testing procedures. Their jobs now rely on their students' scores-- and no teacher is a miracle worker. I spent my whole life in various Indiana school systems, graduating in 2000, and I pity any teacher whose job security is based on the testing scores of the kinds of students I had the misfortune to be in classrooms with. I wish the parents of such students would be held accountable for their stupidity but that's an impossible wish. The blame will forever be placed at teachers' feet and then everyone acts surprised when teachers commit desperate acts like the ones mentioned in this article.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

    2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

    3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

    4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

    5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?