IBJNews

IU football gains ground as sports program nears financial crossroads

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

 

IU Former Baker & Daniels partner Fred Glass is leading the charge to fill IU’s stadium. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

As Indiana University opens its football season, there’s a wave of optimism roaring through the school’s athletic department.

Athletic Director Fred Glass has emphasized marketing, been the point man in radio and television commercials, and is leading the charge into a season that promises football financial gains not seen in Bloomington in a very long time.

While success on the field is not guaranteed, Glass is promising significant attendance increases and a continued rebirth of the football program that he believes will lead to critical fiscal gains for the school and its athletic department.

IU has a long way to go, and some critics wonder if it’s wise for the Hoosiers to chase the likes of Ohio State University … or even the University of Wisconsin. IU’s $55.7 million athletic department budget looks small compared with the Buckeyes’

IU IU expanded the student section at Memorial Stadium three times to accommodate increasing demand for tickets last year. This year, IU officials are inviting the entire freshman class to lead the team onto the field for the home opener. (Indiana University Photo/Mike Dickbernd)

$119.9 million and the Badgers’ $90 million budgets.

“College athletics is a very dangerous investment for schools,” said David Ridpath, a professor of sports administration at Ohio University and past president of The Drake Group, a not-for-profit that bills itself as a watchdog for academic integrity in the face of big-time college sports.

“Schools can get caught up in chasing bigger programs with many more resources, and it becomes difficult to justify the expenses based on true return on investments.”

The NCAA’s own numbers seem to support Ridpath’s claims.

The NCAA reported that, in 2008, only 25 of 120 athletic departments with NCAA Division I football programs brought in more money than they spent. In 2009, that number declined to 14.

IU was among that exclusive group, as was rival Purdue University. It was a notable feat for IU, which has scratched and clawed its way into the black in spite of big capital projects and the payment of sizable severance packages to coaches and athletic directors who were shown the door in recent years.

But IU’s profit margin is thin, and Ridpath cautions that the Hoosiers’ pursuit of “the big boys” could plummet them into the red if school officials are not careful.
IU and Purdue football attendance figuresAs much as some Hoosier faithful might hate to hear this, Glass said Purdue University has a blueprint worth noting when it comes to building a football program.

Glass remains undaunted.

“This David has a few rocks in its bag,” Glass said.

Following Purdue’s path

Purdue Athletic Director Morgan Burke has a conservative approach to building a gridiron winner.

“We put a premium on scouting talent, especially our coaching staff,” Burke said. “We like to bring them in and let them prove themselves. If they produce, then we’ll consider paying them in the top quartile.”

That’s an approach Glass seems to be taking with football coach Bill Lynch, who has a base pay—at $250,000—that is the lowest in the Big Ten.

With his broadcast and media pay, Lynch makes $600,000 annually, but that’s far less than Purdue’s Danny Hope, who makes a minimum of $850,000. And Lynch’s salary isn’t in the neighborhood of the Big Ten’s highest-paid football coaches, who make $3 million to $5 million a year.

Glass said he intends to honor Lynch’s contract, which runs through the 2011 season, then evaluate the situation. That could be Glass’ most critical crossroads.

“The question is, should he go after a big-time coach with no guarantee that he will produce and put more fans in the stands, or does he take a more fiscally conservative route?” Ridpath said. “It’s a huge fork in the road.”

An expensive head coach means expensive assistants. IU currently pays its assistants high-five-figure or low-six-figure annual salaries. But top Big Ten assistants make up to $1 million annually.

Big Ten athletic budgetsCompeting for the best coaches in the Big Ten would send the football staff’s pay up $5 million to $10 million a year. That’s a stiff increase for a team that brings in less than $30 million in revenue.

The right focus

For now, Glass isn’t worrying about changing coaches.

He has worked hard to reduce expenses where he can, cutting his senior staff by one-third, and identifying revenue opportunities. He even moved this year’s Penn State game from Bloomington to Maryland for a $3 million payday.

Increasing attendance at the 52,700-seat Memorial Stadium is one of Glass’ chief concerns.

“When it comes to competing in the Big Ten, we have one hand tied behind our back when it comes to revenue and resources,” Glass said. “Why is that? Football. When I look outside my office and see empty seats in that stadium, I see money. It takes as much for us to throw a party for 21,000 as it does for 52,000.”

Conference football revenue numbers show the steep hill the Hoosiers are scaling.

In 2008, the last year for which NCAA figures are available for all schools, IU brought in $20.8 million in football revenue, more than one-third of IU’s total athletic department revenue. It was $5 million more than IU’s basketball team, which has always rivaled football in the amount of revenue it produces. Still, IU brings in about one-third the football revenue of Ohio State and Penn State and about half of what the University of Iowa and Wisconsin score.

But the football team also chews up a fair bit of the Hoosiers’ budget, and Ridpath said there’s a real risk that could go up. While the basketball team spends only about 8 percent of IU’s athletic department budget, the football team spends more than 20 percent.

“It’s expensive to operate any college football team, and that cost goes up exponentially as you make a bigger charge to be highly competitive,” said Andrew Zimbalist, a noted sports economist and professor at Smith College in Northampton, Mass. “It’s great to be committed to winning. But in the end, you have to ask yourself, ‘What’s the cost? And more importantly, what’s the payoff?’”

Questionable ROI

Opinions vary on how much a winning football or basketball team helps a university. The University of Cincinnati had one of its best football seasons last year, but this year hasn’t seen significant increases in admissions or contributions.

Following a run to the NCAA men’s basketball Final Four, George Mason University reported that applications from out-of-state students swelled 40 percent, and applications from all prospective freshmen increased 22 percent.

Unfortunately, Ridpath said, the payoff is short-lived without sustained success.

“What we find is, the next year, those numbers return to their baseline,” he said.

For IU, Glass said building football is the only way to boost athletics.

“What the basketball team can do financially is about maxed out,” he said. “The potential right now lies with bolstering that football program.”

Glass also argues that IU students who become attached to the football program remain more active—and generous—alums.

Glass gains ground

Cost and payoff aside, there are reasons for optimism at IU. Glass was hired to replace Rick Greenspan as athletic director in October 2008. Last season, Glass’ first, football attendance at IU increased 10,100 per game, to 41,833. It was the highest average attendance since 1992 and, according to NCAA records, it was the third-biggest football attendance increase among all Division I schools.

Season-ticket sales were 17,278 last year—up more than 5,000 from the previous year. This year, 19,100 have been sold. Revenue per home football game increased from $445,933 in 2008 to $698,936 in 2009.

Revenue grew even as Glass slashed ticket prices for college students and anyone under 18. In some cases, it was a $13 to $15 price reduction. He took down the nets that kept footballs from going into the stands after kicks and launched Knothole Park at the stadium’s south end for kids. IU’s Kelley School of Business was commissioned to do marketing studies, and Glass thinks some of the ideas that resulted will drive attendance even higher this year.

A point of emphasis is engaging incoming students. Football players helped freshmen move into their dorm rooms this year, and the entire freshman class was invited to lead the football team out onto the field for its Sept. 2 home opener. Glass unveiled a $2 million scoreboard, the second-largest and most technologically advanced in the nation, he said.

Glass, a former partner in the Indianapolis law firm Baker & Daniels, has surprised some with his creative approach. Ironically, some IU supporters have criticized him for focusing too much on the side show and not enough on the main event.

“We’re not trying to create the Roman circus where people aren’t paying attention to what else is going on,” Glass said. “I realize winning is the most critical marketing element. But I reject that we can’t do anything until we start winning.”

There’s a solid argument that IU should try to win, but not at all costs.

After all, the Big Ten is one of the most generous when it comes to revenue sharing. With the Big Ten Network, IU brings in $15 million annually from TV revenue alone. IU stands to make another $2 million from the conference’s championship football game, which will debut in 2011 at Lucas Oil Stadium, and there are other revenue-sharing mechanisms in the conference that have helped IU and Purdue remain in the black.

While Glass said he’ll be aggressive in trying to build a winning football team, he also remains pragmatic.

“Are we going to be a dominant football power in the Big Ten? Probably not,” Glass said. “But can we break into a BCS bowl game? Absolutely. I wouldn’t be here if I didn’t believe that.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • pure dissappointment
    i sit here and watch IU lose once again to Iowa and all i can say is IU football blows and it always will blow. I'm a diehard iu fan (every wall in my room is red and white striped) and im to the point where im embarrassed to admit i like IU. Basketball program is on the rise but just because its IU something will happen to mess that up. ive lost all hope. fire bill.
  • Prices
    According to what's printed on my season tickets, prices are $35 and $45 for non-conference and Big Ten games, respectively.
  • Broken Glass
    Glass is rolling dice, praying for payoff, but the culture of a thousand or two drunk kids standing in the fields next to the stadium DURING the game persists, even with $5 and free tix. He's got some good ideas: Pep band marching in the street before game, knothole park, other in-stadium activities. Push the boozers out, make it about the GAME and not the NEVER-ENDING IU BOOZEFEST, and real sports fans, win or lose IU, will be back. I know I would, but for now the beer bottles, urinating drunks and the "win or lose, we're gonna booze" attitude prevail at this institution.
  • Tickets
    As an IU alum, I enjoy going back for a game or two, but the price of tickets to a footbal game is $40 and $50 for a Big Ten game. I'm not sure who establishes these prices, but why do they believe that they can compete with the Colts? Sure, if you're under 18 it's $5, but still these prices are ridiculous. Why not set them at $20 or $25, and fill the stands? This would build a fan base and then slowly up the price. I'm not sure of the logic - but 20K fans at current prices or 40K at about 1/2 the price would lead to the same revenue but increased concessions and other sales.
    • Tickets
      As an IU alum, I enjoy going back for a game or two, but the price of tickets to a footbal game is $40 and $50 for a Big Ten game. I'm not sure who establishes these prices, but why do they believe that they can compete with the Colts? Sure, if you're under 18 it's $5, but still these prices are ridiculous. Why not set them at $20 or $25, and fill the stands? This would build a fan base and then slowly up the price. I'm not sure of the logic - but 20K fans at current prices or 40K at about 1/2 the price would lead to the same revenue but increased concessions and other sales.
    • Glass understands IU
      Fred understands the traditions and history in Bloomington, he's an IUB grad. He's also working without a long term golden contract. He get's IU's product and listens well, the attributes of a great lawyer and leader. Kepp up the grreat work Fred, GO IU!
    • Right Person?
      Just like the problematic CIB led by an accountant as CEO IU too is being led by a lawyer. Neither of which, I dare say have ever led anything of significance in their lives. Case Closed. Moral of the story-"Whose checking the resume? What are they looking for? You get what you pay for!"
    • ROI for Indianapolis?
      Why don't you ask Fred what the ROI is on his Colts deal?

      That was when he sold his soul and sided with football interests over the citizens of Indiana. is he following the same path at IU? He should spend the rest of his life trying correct his mistakes.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

    2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

    3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

    4. If you only knew....

    5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

    ADVERTISEMENT