2010 WOMAN OF INFLUENCE: Jennifer Pope Baker

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Executive Director, Women's Fund of Central Indiana

Sphere of Influence: As executive director of the Women’s Fund of Central Indiana (a special interest fund of the Central Indiana Community Foundation), Baker has awarded grants to dozens of innovative central Indiana programs supporting women and girls.

Baker (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

During these tough economic times, Jennifer Pope Baker, executive director of the Women’s Fund of Central Indiana, has managed an impressive financial trick. Under her tutelage the organization’s endowment has grown from $3 million in 1998 to $11 million at present. That expansion allowed the fund to distribute some $3.2 million via 336 grants to 89 central Indiana organizations serving women and girls.

All this while enduring the same one-two punch delivered to pretty much every other not-for-profit in the state—an increased demand for services just as hard-hit donors grow reticent about shelling out cash. Baker thinks the organization’s youth helped it weather the storm, because the fund hasn’t yet exhausted its pool of potential givers. Plus, there are few people with whom the organization’s mission doesn’t resonate.

“While some donors may be more cautious, others are giving more because of their acute awareness of the growing needs,” said Baker, 43. “We have lots of good stories of success and positive outcomes through our grants and our philanthropy and education programming.”

Two of her most innovative concepts are the OPTIONS and GO programs. OPTIONS takes one class of 20 women between the ages of 25 and 45 each year through a philanthropy education program designed by Baker. The GO program has an even longer timeline. This philanthropy education class for children allows an adult to create a donor-advised fund for any child under 18, to start them on a lifetime of giving.

“In the next 20 or 30 years when today’s GO participants are leaders in the community, I foresee that they will make positive decisions for women and girls without even thinking about it,” Baker said. “They will have a giving plan and feel confident about how they want to participate in the community as a volunteer and as a donor.” Both OPTIONS and GO are being copied nationwide.

She’s also working to make Indianapolis the third community in the country to initiate the micro-lending program Grameen America, an offshoot of a similar concept founded as Grameen Bank in Bangladesh, which offers extremely small (at least by traditional standards) loans, mostly to women, to improve their education or found small businesses. Baker hopes that here, just as in Bangladesh, a little cash can go a long way. “This has the power to make multi-generational change,” she said. “Women will be positioned to control their financial destiny and not be dependent on the goodwill of others. I can’t think of a better gift to give to a woman: the ability to create a healthy future for herself and her family.”

Such devotion to family is equally evident in Baker. She and her husband, Chris, have two children, Catherine, 10, and Charlie, 5. She spends her off-duty time with them, riding bikes, walking or visiting The Children’s Museum, where she serves on The Children’s Museum Guild.

“I feel like my personal and professional lives are entwined,” Baker said. “I care deeply about making a difference for women and girls. I hope that my actions and words give others encouragement, hope, and a sense of what is possible in life.”


Click here to return to the Women of Influence landing page.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

  2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

  3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

  4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

  5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!