IBJNews

2010 WOMAN OF INFLUENCE: Judge Tanya Walton Pratt

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

U.S. District Court Judge, Southern District of Indiana

Sphere of Influence: In October of last year Tanya Walton Pratt was sworn in as the first African-American federal judge in Indiana history, and only the third woman on the Southern District bench. But being in the spotlight—and on the spot—is nothing new for her.
 

Walton (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

She started making waves in her judicial career years ago, first serving as supervising judge of the Marion County Juvenile Detention Center, where she enacted several important reforms. And during the year-and-a-half she spent as probate judge of Marion County, she publicly expounded on the need to adopt children in foster care. “Helping children find the permanency of a home and a family is rewarding and important work,” Pratt said.

She acknowledges that law and the profession of judging can be stressful. “When I first became an elected judge in 1996, I was often surprised at the magnitude of decisions that I had to make,” Pratt said.

She spent 12 years presiding over major felony criminal cases ranging from burglary to rape to murder. “Making tough decisions in both the criminal court and the civil courts has helped define me as both a person and a judge,” she said. “Fortunately I have the ability to leave work issues at work.”

Not surprisingly she feels her experiences have matured her. Pratt’s current position is a lifetime appointment, and she clearly realizes the effects her actions have on the lives of others, causing her to hone her analytical and decision-making skills. “It calls upon me to use my own sense of justice and integrity, to provide equal justice for rich and poor, and to conduct the office impartially under the constitution,” she said.

Pratt, 50, describes federal district courts as the workhorses of the federal judiciary. She thinks the biggest challenge in the coming years will be handling the Southern District’s traditionally heavy caseload. She figures her strong work ethic will power her through the learning curve. “The cases are exciting and new and every day is a challenge,” she said. “A welcome challenge. I am doing what I think I was put on this earth to do. And I am grateful to do something that I’m passionate about and that I think is profoundly important.”

However, she thinks her biggest contribution may be as an example to others. She points out that luminaries as diverse as John F. Kennedy and Sarah Evans Barker have remarked on the fact that bringing diverse talents, energies and views to any endeavor—and particularly the bench—only helps its credibility.

“The continued legitimacy of the court system and the underlying American concept of fairness requires diversity for our federal and state courts,” she says. “The significance of being the first is that it encourages others to reach the heights of our profession.”

In her off hours Pratt enjoys spending time with her family: husband, Marcel, and daughter, Lena, a 19-year-old Howard University sophomore. Pratt also likes cooking, travel and genealogy.
___

Click here to return to the Women of Influence landing page.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. This is still my favorite Mexican restaurant in town. What I do love about the new version is it is much quieter than the most recent version. TV's were off, the music wasn't too loud, and the wait staff were not hyperactive like they had been the past few times I had been there. I just wish they would bring back the MOLE for the enchiladas!

  2. Not a bad paper. There is a need for local community news and city government issues. Don't really need the owner's constant national political rants. We all know where they stand by now.

  3. What nice people. Menard should've known better than to team up with the guy who robbed and drove Conseco to ashes. I'm surprised Timothy Durham isn't involved in this.

  4. Hello, I am Maris Peters, currently living in Texas city, USA. I am a widow at the moment with three kids and i was stuck in a financial situation in August 2014 and i needed to refinance and pay my bills. I tried seeking loans from various loan Companies both private and corporate but never with success, and most banks declined my credit. But as God would have it, I was introduced to a Man of God a private loan lender who gave me a loan of $65,000USD and today am a business owner and my kids are doing well at the moment, if you must contact any firm or company with reference to securing a loan without collateral , no credit check, no co signer with just 2% interest rate and better repayment plans and schedule, please contact Mr William David. He doesn’t know that am doing this but am so happy now and i decided to let people know more about him and also i want God to bless him more.You can contact him through his email: Davidloanfirm@yahoo.com

  5. It is beyond me how anyone can think this was a "bad deal" for the state! If they could take the money back then, yes, but they can't! Protections were built in the agreement. Now, if they roll the roads up and take them away, I will agree that it was a bad deal. Otherwise, the only way to have paid for the infrastructure that was badly needed was for the state to issue bonds....that is a four letter synonym for debt folks!!

ADVERTISEMENT