2010 WOMAN OF INFLUENCE: Judge Tanya Walton Pratt

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

U.S. District Court Judge, Southern District of Indiana

Sphere of Influence: In October of last year Tanya Walton Pratt was sworn in as the first African-American federal judge in Indiana history, and only the third woman on the Southern District bench. But being in the spotlight—and on the spot—is nothing new for her.

Walton (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

She started making waves in her judicial career years ago, first serving as supervising judge of the Marion County Juvenile Detention Center, where she enacted several important reforms. And during the year-and-a-half she spent as probate judge of Marion County, she publicly expounded on the need to adopt children in foster care. “Helping children find the permanency of a home and a family is rewarding and important work,” Pratt said.

She acknowledges that law and the profession of judging can be stressful. “When I first became an elected judge in 1996, I was often surprised at the magnitude of decisions that I had to make,” Pratt said.

She spent 12 years presiding over major felony criminal cases ranging from burglary to rape to murder. “Making tough decisions in both the criminal court and the civil courts has helped define me as both a person and a judge,” she said. “Fortunately I have the ability to leave work issues at work.”

Not surprisingly she feels her experiences have matured her. Pratt’s current position is a lifetime appointment, and she clearly realizes the effects her actions have on the lives of others, causing her to hone her analytical and decision-making skills. “It calls upon me to use my own sense of justice and integrity, to provide equal justice for rich and poor, and to conduct the office impartially under the constitution,” she said.

Pratt, 50, describes federal district courts as the workhorses of the federal judiciary. She thinks the biggest challenge in the coming years will be handling the Southern District’s traditionally heavy caseload. She figures her strong work ethic will power her through the learning curve. “The cases are exciting and new and every day is a challenge,” she said. “A welcome challenge. I am doing what I think I was put on this earth to do. And I am grateful to do something that I’m passionate about and that I think is profoundly important.”

However, she thinks her biggest contribution may be as an example to others. She points out that luminaries as diverse as John F. Kennedy and Sarah Evans Barker have remarked on the fact that bringing diverse talents, energies and views to any endeavor—and particularly the bench—only helps its credibility.

“The continued legitimacy of the court system and the underlying American concept of fairness requires diversity for our federal and state courts,” she says. “The significance of being the first is that it encourages others to reach the heights of our profession.”

In her off hours Pratt enjoys spending time with her family: husband, Marcel, and daughter, Lena, a 19-year-old Howard University sophomore. Pratt also likes cooking, travel and genealogy.

Click here to return to the Women of Influence landing page.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now