KAR Auction Services mum on leveraged buyout talk

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Carmel-based KAR Auction Services Inc. isn’t commenting on a report by Reuters that it is talking with private equity firms about taking the company private for the third time in its 30-year history.

Private equity firms including Kelso & Co. and Goldman Sachs Capital Partners still own about 74 percent of the nation’s second-largest used vehicle auction chain.

Publicly traded KAR’s principal businesses are used-car auction company Adesa Inc., salvage-vehicle auction firm Insurance Auto Auctions Inc. and Automotive Finance Corp., which helps dealers finance vehicle purchases.

KAR has a market value of $2.3 billion. It posted profit of $72.2 million on $1.9 billion in revenue in 2011.

On Wednesday, KAR shares jumped to $18.36, their highest since May, after Reuters reported the company may be contemplating a leveraged buyout, and then fell. Shares were trading at $17.18 at midday Friday, up 6 cents on the day.

Reuters, citing sources close to the discussion, said Kelso & Co. and KAR’s other chief equity holders had reached out to other buyout firms to discuss a sale.

Kelso, Goldman Sachs Capital Partners, ValueAct Capital and Parthenon Capital took KAR private in 2007.

The auto auction industry has struggled in recent years with the economic downturn that dashed new car sales. That meant fewer new cars coming off lease to auction.

KAR shares peaked just above $20 in mid-2011.

Existing private equity holdings might be figuring,”Hey, let’s get our money out” now, said Mark Foster, chief investment officer at Columbus-based Kirr Marbach & Co.

The expectation of higher capital gains taxes next year has been driving such deal talk, as well, he noted.

Fundamentally, as a public company, “it’s not like they [KAR] need capital” right now, Foster said.

KAR might not fetch as much these days as before, according to a report issued Thursday by Barclays Capital.

Historical merger-and-acquisition multiples in the auto auction industry have been in the range of nine to 10 times earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, said Barclays. Private equity “is unlikely to pay similar valuation for auto auctions today given the declining volumes in the overall industry,” the investment firm said.

At a more reasonable eight to 10 times EBITDA, KAR’s value is more like $16 to $25 a share, and “we see lower end,” Barclay's said.

Barclays was pessimistic KAR would find bidders from within the industry because big players already have a sizeable presence in the respective businesses, and because of antitrust issues.

KAR predecessor ADESA  first went public in 1992. Three years later it was snapped up by the parent of Minnesota Power & Light, known as ALLETE.

In 2004, ALLETE spun off the remaining shares to the public. The company was taken private again in 2007 when KAR was formed by Kelso and the other equity partners.

They took KAR public in 2009 at about $12 a share, raising $313 million.

Atlanta-based Manheim Inc. is the only auto auction company bigger than KAR by volume of trade.



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

  2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

  3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

  4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

  5. Oh wait. Never mind.