IBJNews

Keystone plans mixed-use project on Madison Avenue

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A local developer is planning a $2 million mixed-use project for a vacant parcel along Madison Avenue just south of downtown Indianapolis.

The plans from Keystone Group call for a three-story building immediately north of a new Bureau of Motor Vehicles license branch at the southwest corner of Madison and Terrace avenues. The first floor would be leased for office or retail uses, and upper floors would be apartments.

The developer won zoning approval this month from the Metropolitan Development Commission after making adjustments to an early site plan, said John Bartholomew, a spokesman for the Department of Metropolitan Development.

The plans filed with the city show a second three-story building to the north of the one the city approved. Keystone will add the second structure, also with apartments and retail space, at a later date if demand continues to grow in the neighborhood, said Tara Acton-Shaver, property manager for the privately held construction and development firm.

The company is partnering with Concord Community Development Corp. on the project, which could provide a residential boost to an area that had been zoned for light industrial.

The apartment portion will include units set aside for a variety of income levels since some funding will come from the federal Neighborhood Stabilization Program, said Mark Flanary, Concord's executive director. He said the first building will cost about $2 million.

"A mixed-use project like this is invaluable for revitalizing our neighborhood," Flanary said. "The impact is going to be fantastic, especially with the retail portion. We're hoping to see even more mixed-use, and we hope to springboard off this project."

Keystone acquired the 2.8-acre, triangle-shaped parcel in 2009. It was then home to three vacant industrial buildings and a remaining wall from an old brick warehouse, which the company tore down.

The site is across the street from Sisters' Place Restaurant, and just south of Madison Plaza, a 180,000-square-foot office conversion project also by Keystone.

Before Keystone made changes to its proposal, city planners had expressed concerns about the compatability of the project with the neighborhood and the suburban-style arrangement of the proposed buildings, set back from the street with large parking lots in front. The proposed buildings also would be taller than what is normally allowed under city code.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Whole Story?
    I'd venture a guess that Keystone didn't tell the MDC that they were using the open parking spaces in the lot at Madison and Terrace for overflow for the poorly planned Madison Plaza lot.
  • New Urbanism Rules
    About time MetroIndy (non-Hamilton County) using some intelligence in urban/suburban planning. A mixed-use development is much better than the separate zoning uses (commercial over here, residential over there, etc.) found out in the 'burbs that prevent any pedestrian/non-motorized traffic and community interaction.
  • Say what?
    No site plan showing this mixed-use building in the middle of a parking lot?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am also a "vet" of several Cirque shows and this one left me flat. It didn't have the amount of acrobatic stunts as the others that I have seen. I am still glad that I went to it and look forward to the next one but I put Varekai as my least favorite.

  2. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  3. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  4. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  5. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

ADVERTISEMENT