IBJNews

Lauth embarks on turnaround of The Congressional in Carmel

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Lauth Group Inc. is leading what it expects will be a wave of new tenants for The Congressional, an 181,000-square-foot Carmel office building that was on a downward slide before the developer bought it last December.

Lauth moved its headquarters to the building at 116th Street and Pennsylvania Parkway about six weeks ago, occupying more than 14,500 square feet. Last week it announced three new tenants: Shepherd Insurance LLC, which leased almost 19,000 square feet; the consulting firm Thoughtburst, filling 3,300 square feet; and The Strategy Forums, an executive development firm that has agreed to lease almost 1,700 square feet.

Shepherd and Thoughtburst moved into The Congressional at the end of May, and The Strategy Forums should be there by the end of the month.

Together with Lauth they represent the first signs of new life for a building that was less than 30 percent occupied when Lauth bought it for $7.1 million from Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. Though occupancy has climbed back to 46 percent, it will slide back down to 32 percent when Audiovox vacates about 28,000 square feet later this summer.

Lauth headquarters, CarmelLauth is hoping to breathe new life into The Congressional. (Photo courtesy of Lauth)

But Lauth is not focused on Audiovox’s departure, which it knew was coming. Instead it’s focusing on what it sees as The Congressional’s strong upside potential.

The developer plans to spend more than $2 million to renovate its expansive 3,600-square-foot lobby, remodel restrooms, upgrade its 12-acre grounds, replace the roof and upgrade mechanical systems, said company President Michael Jones.

Jones said the first wave of improvements to the five-story building should be finished later this summer, in time for an open house that Lauth intends to turn into a fundraiser for a local charity.

Lauth’s bet on the building is a safe one, Jones said, because of The Congressional’s location right off U.S. 31 and its 40,000-square-foot floor size. That’s about twice as large as other multi-tenant buildings in the market.

With two entire floors for lease, the building already is attracting the attention of large users. The top two floors have been empty since the building’s anchor tenant, the mortgage division of HSBC Bank, moved out near the beginning of the national real estate crisis. Around the same time, another large tenant, Ingersoll Rand, vacated the entire third floor and part of the second.

The departures in the midst of a tanking market spelled trouble for the building, which had been owned since it was developed in 1986 by REI Real Estate Services. REI deeded the property to lender Nationwide last year. Nationwide then hired Cassidy Turley to sell the building.

Darrin Boyd, managing director and principal of Cassidy Turley, agrees that The Congressional represents a great turnaround opportunity for Lauth. “It’s a very nice Class A building that had a lot of deferred maintenance and high vacancy.”

The asking rent of $18.50 a square foot is right in line with the market, Boyd said. The sale price of about $40 a square foot indicates the building has a strong upside. Boyd was recently involved in the sale of a similar building, though one filled with tenants and without the deferred maintenance, for around $90 a square foot.

Lauth is managing and leasing The Congressional. Also involved in leasing are John Vandenbark and Rick Trimpe of CBRE.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT