IBJNews

Lilly Endowment's assets drop more than foundation peers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Once the nation’s wealthiest foundation, Indianapolis-based Lilly Endowment now ranks ninth among its grant-making peers.

The endowment’s value fell 15 percent last year, to an estimated $4.8 billion—the largest drop among the 10 largest foundations in the country, according to a report published this week in The Chronicle of Philanthropy.

Lilly Endowment’s wealth is particularly volatile because it holds about 95 percent of its assets in underperforming Eli Lilly and Co. stock.

Both Lilly stock and the endowment have lost almost 70 percent of their value since peaking in 2000. At the time, Lilly Endowment was worth $15.6 billion, second only to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

In 2009, the Seattle-based Gates Foundation increased its assets by 13 percent, to $33.9 billion, maintaining its decade-long hold on the top foundation spot.

Lilly shares have swooned since the Indianapolis drugmaker lost patent protection for its blockbuster Prozac in August 2000. Almost four years ago, the endowment announced plans to diversify its holdings—and mitigate its risk—by selling $2 billion of Lilly stock. But as IBJ reported this month, it has sold only $390 million in shares so far.

Only two other foundations on the Chronicle’s Top 10 list lost value in 2009: the Ford Foundation in New York and the W.K. Kellogg Foundation in Battle Creek, Mich. Ford’s assets dropped 6 percent; Kellogg’s declined 13 percent.

The value of a foundation’s assets have a direct effect on its grant making, since tax laws require such organizations to distribute at least 5 percent of their holdings each year.

Endowment spokeswoman Gretchen Wolfram told IBJ she could not disclose the total value of gifts approved in 2009 until the organization's annual report is released next month, but she acknowledged that grant making declined last year.

Despite the drop in assets and rank, "we still consider ourselves an important and large foundation," Wolfram said.

Microsoft founder Gates’ foundation approved $3 billion in grants last year, according to the Chronicle report. Ford Foundation, which ranked second with $10.5 billion in assets, approved $482 million in grants.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

  2. Yes. Blame those who were too lazy to go vote Obama out and those who voted him in again. That's my take on it. I know folks won't get it on the left. OK. Start berating me now!

  3. Serioulsy, people are AGINST this project? Most communities would be salivating over a project like this. You'd rather have an empty eye-sore gas station and shacks posing as apartments? This project is exactly what BR needs. BUILD IT MR MAYOR. And yes, I am a BR resident, and have been for 20 years.

  4. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

  5. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

ADVERTISEMENT