Lilly Endowment's assets drop more than foundation peers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Once the nation’s wealthiest foundation, Indianapolis-based Lilly Endowment now ranks ninth among its grant-making peers.

The endowment’s value fell 15 percent last year, to an estimated $4.8 billion—the largest drop among the 10 largest foundations in the country, according to a report published this week in The Chronicle of Philanthropy.

Lilly Endowment’s wealth is particularly volatile because it holds about 95 percent of its assets in underperforming Eli Lilly and Co. stock.

Both Lilly stock and the endowment have lost almost 70 percent of their value since peaking in 2000. At the time, Lilly Endowment was worth $15.6 billion, second only to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

In 2009, the Seattle-based Gates Foundation increased its assets by 13 percent, to $33.9 billion, maintaining its decade-long hold on the top foundation spot.

Lilly shares have swooned since the Indianapolis drugmaker lost patent protection for its blockbuster Prozac in August 2000. Almost four years ago, the endowment announced plans to diversify its holdings—and mitigate its risk—by selling $2 billion of Lilly stock. But as IBJ reported this month, it has sold only $390 million in shares so far.

Only two other foundations on the Chronicle’s Top 10 list lost value in 2009: the Ford Foundation in New York and the W.K. Kellogg Foundation in Battle Creek, Mich. Ford’s assets dropped 6 percent; Kellogg’s declined 13 percent.

The value of a foundation’s assets have a direct effect on its grant making, since tax laws require such organizations to distribute at least 5 percent of their holdings each year.

Endowment spokeswoman Gretchen Wolfram told IBJ she could not disclose the total value of gifts approved in 2009 until the organization's annual report is released next month, but she acknowledged that grant making declined last year.

Despite the drop in assets and rank, "we still consider ourselves an important and large foundation," Wolfram said.

Microsoft founder Gates’ foundation approved $3 billion in grants last year, according to the Chronicle report. Ford Foundation, which ranked second with $10.5 billion in assets, approved $482 million in grants.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...