IBJNews

Lilly misses analyst estimates, lowers profit forecast

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Third-quarter profit at Eli Lilly and Co. missed analysts' estimates, and the Indianapolis-based drugmaker lowered its profit forecast by 4 cents per share for the remainder of the year.

Shares in Lilly were down more than 2 percent at midday Wednesday, to $50.76 each.

Lilly earned $1.3 billion during the three months ended Sept. 30, up by 7 percent from the same period a year ago. But that boost was due largely to an early payoff from former drug-development partner Amylin Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Excluding the Amylin payments and other special items, Lilly’s profit would have fallen to $888 million, a whopping 29-percent decline from the same period last year. On that basis, earnings per share were 79 cents in the most recent quarter.

Wall Street analysts were expecting 83 cents per share, according to a survey by Thomson Reuters.

Lilly’s revenue also was below analysts’ forecasts. The company brought in $5.44 billion during the quarter, down 11 percent from the same quarter last year. Analysts were expecting $5.62 billion.

Lilly lowered its full-year profit forecast to a range of $3.68 per share to $3.78 per share. Larger asset impairment and restructuring costs shaved 4 cents from the forecast issued in August.

However, excluding all special gains or losses, Lilly still expects to earn from $3.30 per share to $3.40 per share, the same as it had forecast in August.

“Lilly reported a ho-hum quarter,” Mark Schoenebaum, an analyst with ISI Group in New York, said in a note to clients, according to Bloomberg News. “Marginally weak financial quarter, but nothing terrible.”

Lilly’s revenue has been falling because its former bestseller Zyprexa lost patent protection a year ago. Lilly has been trying to offset the loss of $2.5 billion in Zyprexa revenue so far this year by improving sales of other drugs.

In the third quarter, sales of the antidepressant Cymbalta, the osteoporosis drug Forteo and Lilly’s animal health products all grew 20 percent or more over the same quarter last year.

Lilly also received $1.26 billion from Amylin following Amylin's acquisition by New York-based Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Lilly and Amylin had co-developed the diabetes drugs Byetta and Bydureon. But a dispute last year led to a break-up of their partnership.

Lilly’s shares fell Tuesday prior to the earnings announcement by less than 1 percentage point, to $51.91. The stock had been flat all year until Aug. 24, when Lilly announced its experimental Alzheiemer’s drug solanezumab had shown some positive effects on patients. Since then, Lilly’s shares have traded up 22 percent.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

  2. Yes. Blame those who were too lazy to go vote Obama out and those who voted him in again. That's my take on it. I know folks won't get it on the left. OK. Start berating me now!

  3. Serioulsy, people are AGINST this project? Most communities would be salivating over a project like this. You'd rather have an empty eye-sore gas station and shacks posing as apartments? This project is exactly what BR needs. BUILD IT MR MAYOR. And yes, I am a BR resident, and have been for 20 years.

  4. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

  5. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

ADVERTISEMENT