IBJNews

Lilly seeks to block imports of cancer drug copy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Eli Lilly and Co. asked a U.S. trade agency on Thursday to block Hospira Inc. from selling a generic version of the cancer treatment Gemzar, saying the drug violates a patent on the process for making the active ingredient.

Lilly’s complaint to the U.S. International Trade Commission in Washington claims Hospira’s gemcitabine, Gemzar’s active ingredient, infringes a patent expiring in February 2014.

Global sales of Gemzar, used to treat lung, breast, pancreatic and ovarian cancer, fell about 14 percent to $905.8 million in the nine months ended in September, the Indianapolis-based company said Oct. 21.

Hospira began selling gemcitabine in November after Lilly lost an appeals court ruling that said a separate patent expiring in May 2013 was invalid.

The patented method is “the most commercially viable process available for manufacturing gemcitabine” and “involves less steps, higher yields and lower costs,” Lilly said in its complaint. Hospira has refused to provide records on the process it uses to make gemcitabine, according to the complaint.

Lilly is committed to protecting its intellectual property, Mark Taylor, a company spokesman, said in an e-mail Friday. Officials with Lake Forest, Ill.-based Hospira didn’t immediately return a message seeking comment.

The ITC has the power to bar imports of products that infringe U.S. patents and typically completes investigations in about 15 months.

Hospira sued Lilly in October. It’s seeking a court ruling that its process wouldn’t infringe the patent.

Lilly is facing generic competition for its three biggest products in the next two years: schizophrenia drug Zyprexa, antidepressant Cymbalta and the insulin Humalog. The three drugs generated $9.95 billion in 2009 sales, or about 46 percent of the company’s total revenue.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • idiots
    stop issuing patents for medicine that saves lives. the pharmcos will become extremely competitive, and diseaeses will be cured! this behavior only slows medical research to a crawl. for what? a billionaire's profit?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT