IBJNews

Appeals court rejects Lilly over Gemzar patent

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly and Co. has failed to win an appeals court rehearing over its loss of patent protection for the cancer drug Gemzar.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit today, in a notice posted Monday morning on the court’s website, said it denied a request for a rehearing before the original panel or for a hearing before the entire court.

Without an appeal, generic drugs are now poised to wipe away most of Lilly’s $750 million in annual U.S. revenue from the drug. Gemzar is approved to treat ovarian, breast, pancreatic and non-small-cell lung cancers.

Lilly had asked the appeals court to reconsider its decision rendered in July, which upheld an August 2009 ruling against Lilly’s patent claims by a federal court in Michigan.

Lilly had claimed that its patent on its method of using Gemzar to treat cancer should protect the drug until 2013. But that patent was ruled invalid, meaning that Lilly’s only valid patent on Gemzar is its composition-of-matter patent on the drug’s formula.

That composition-of-matter patent expires this month.

In spite of the last-ditch appeal, Lilly officials wrote late last month in a securities filing that they expect generic Gemzar to hit the U.S. market as early as mid-November.

Indian generic-drug maker Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Hospira Inc. and Novartis AG’s Sandoz are seeking to sell lower-cost versions of the medicine.

 “We are currently considering our remaining legal options,” Mark Taylor, a Lilly spokesman, said in an e-mailed statement. “We will not speculate on whether generic competitors will be prepared to enter the market upon expiration of Gemzar’s compound patent in mid-November.”

Lilly had asked that the original three-judge panel reconsider the case or that it be heard before all active judges of the court, which specializes in U.S. patent law.

Of the nine active judges, four said the case should have been heard before the entire court, saying there are questions about the legal standard to determine if there has been double patenting.

Gemzar is the first of several blockbuster Lilly drugs that will see their patents expire between now and 2013. Generic versions of Zyprexa, Cymbalta, Evista and Strattera could zap nearly half of Lilly's current sales, putting great pressure on the company to find new drugs to take their place.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Lilly employees do like your Liberal judges now??
    Of the nine judges that ruled, the five the ruled AGAINST LILLY were Bryson (Clinton appointment), Gajarsa (Clintaon Appt), Dyk (Clinton Appt) and then the last two were by Bush II---which is why he is hated by everyone.

    Of note is that the Bush I and Reagan judges, they get it. They voted for Lilly.

    Point: Lilly employees vote liberal. And those politicians appt liberal judges---which are putting Lilly out of business. Too funny.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

ADVERTISEMENT