The leader of the 650 unionized workers at the General Motors stamping plant in Indianapolis says he did not authorize negotiations
over wage cuts meant to entice a potential buyer of the plant, contrary to what another union official said Wednesday.
But negotiations for a new wage contract will proceed anyway, according to Maurice "Mo" Davison, an Indianapolis
representative of the International United Auto Workers, which is based on Detroit.
At stake in the middle of the union feud is the future of the GM plant on the west side of the White River. The Detroit-based
automaker plans to close the plant in September 2011. Illinois-based JD Norman Industries wants to buy the plant, but only
if workers agree to wages and benefits that are about half what they’re receiving now.
Davison told IBJ on Wednesday that Greg Clark, chairman of UAW Local 23
at the GM plant, “requested” that the International UAW negotiate a new labor agreement that local union members
could then vote up or down.
But Clark called a news conference Thursday morning at the Local 23 union hall to clarify that he didn't agree to new
negotiations because his members already voted a month ago not to do so.
“I won’t come back and ask them to do anything,” Clark recalled saying at a meeting Wednesday at U.S. Rep.
Andre Carson’s office, which included Davison, JD Norman founder Justin D. Norman and some of Carson’s staff members.
“We stand by the May 26th vote.”
That's when Local 23 members voted overwhelmingly to reject any negotiations with JD Norman, Clark said. According to
the UAW constitution, he added, no one, including him, has the authority to go against that vote.
But Davison said that’s not how the meeting played out.
“Greg Clark said he wanted an agreement brought back” for the local members to consider, Davison insisted. “We’re
going to honor that request.”
Clark said the pressure on him to allow negotiations to proceed has been intense. Since Local 23’s vote on May 26,
he has received a voice message from Gov. Mitch Daniels and a call from Indiana Secretary of Commerce Mitch Roob. Both said
jobs at half pay is better than no jobs, Clark said.
Also, Carson has talked to Clark and called the meeting on Wednesday.
“They’re more or less forcing this issue upon us,” said Clark, a 31-year GM veteran. “And we don’t
want it.”
The workers at the GM plant accepted a two-tier wage structure in 2007 that pays existing GM workers $29 an hour plus benefits,
but starts any new workers at $14.65 an hour, plus benefits.
During an all-employee meeting on June 22, Clark said, Justin D. Norman said he wanted to pay the GM stamping plant workers
a total of about $25 an hour in wages and benefits, which is about half what veteran workers like Clark currently receive,
all told.
Clark said he and the union members didn’t like that.
“We simply felt right now that we’ve given enough back to GM,” he said, adding, “Enough’s enough.”

















IBJ Conversations
27 Comments
Add Comment
As GM goes, so goes the nation, and the nation has suffered from a mentality that says blue-collar Americans no longer should be valued in our economy. They are expendable, transferrable. They're lives aren't important. What's important is that we allow rich people, by all means, to remain rich. We did this by allowing a situation where profits are privatized, but losses are socialized. As a country, we turned our backs on our manufacturers, and dare to act surprised when we turn around again, to find them all gone, save for a few, hanging on by their fingernails.
It's really sad.
Welcome to the New Amerika. It is here, and it's not going away.
I know a lot of well paid execs who have taken cuts in pay and pride to feed their family.
What I think the Union is doing is they know if the plant closes, the most senior will be offered jobs at $29 an hour in other cities. So they are looking out for themselves, and not their younger coworkers or the community they live in.
Precedence will obviously be given to experience and skills where they're needed, thus driving up the pay appropriately.
Wake-up call: The Union no longer owns or controls GM. Fair market value is the only equitable method for this taxpayer-owned company.
As Nakita Krushchev said and read this carefully: Ã?¢ââ??¬Ã?â??Your children will live under communism.Ã?¢ââ??¬Ã?Â? Khrushchev said.
Ã?¢ââ??¬Ã?â??On the contrary,Ã?¢ââ??¬Ã?Â? Secretary Benson replied, Ã?¢ââ??¬Ã?â??My grandchildren will
live in freedom as I hope that all people will.Ã?¢ââ??¬Ã?Â?
Khrushchev then retorted: Ã?¢ââ??¬Ã?â??You Americans are so gullible. No, you wonÃ?¢ââ??‰â??¢t
accept Communism outright; but weÃ?¢ââ??‰â??¢ll keep feeding you small doses of
Socialism until you will finally wake up and find that you already have
Communism. We wonÃ?¢ââ??‰â??¢t have to fight you; weÃ?¢ââ??‰â??¢ll so weaken your economy,
until you fall like overripe fruit into our hands.Ã?¢ââ??¬Ã?Â?
WAKE UP EVERYONE!!
Tom Cream BTW makes $600,000 (followed by the Purdue pres., the IU pres., the IU athletic director, the BSU pres. and the BSU football coach - see if any of them will work for 1/2 pay.)
I'm not sure what they thought they were voting for in May. They really don't have a say in the matter. If there are no provision, then the plant closes and no one has a job. Duh!
If they choose to "strike" (laugh) in the event of sell with lower wages, then those who do will be replaced very quickly. What arrogance! We're no talking about jobs that require rocket scientists or a degree. Take this part and move it over there several hundred times a day. I think that there are many unemployed folks who would jump on to take one of those jobs.
I do hope that the plant is acquired by someone and used, though. I hate seeing the local economy suffer and people losing jobs. However, I do hope that the people who truly care to work hard will get or remain in those jobs.
I have a great job, no union and I have managed to keep employed for the last 16 years without "help" from some idiots that claim to "help" employees. Unions keep LAZY people employed!
I have a great job, no union and I have managed to keep employed for the last 16 years without "help" from some idiots that claim to "help" employees. Unions keep LAZY people employed!
I have a great job, no union and I have managed to keep employed for the last 16 years without "help" from some idiots that claim to "help" employees. Unions keep LAZY people employed!