Loss of Pacers season would deal blow to CIB, state revenue

Scott Olson , Anthony Schoetle
October 11, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Taxing bodies and downtown businesses are bracing for an economic body blow with the crushing impact of a Roy Hibbert pick now that cancellation of the Indiana Pacers' entire 2011-2012 season is a real possibility.

NBA Commissioner David Stern canceled the first two weeks of the regular season on Monday—including the Pacers first seven games—after owners and players were unable to reach a new labor deal and end the lockout. Failure to reach a deal soon could emperil the entire season.

If that happens, the Capital Improvement Board might lose $1.5 million in food-and-beverage taxes, and the state could miss out on $3.5 million in Professional Sports Development Area funds, CIB Chief Financial Office Dan Huge said at Monday afternoon's CIB meeting. The PSDA captures state sales tax revenue generated by downtown venues, including Conseco Fieldhouse.

Huge did have some good news to report at Monday's meeting. He said that through August, CIB is running $13 million over budget, largely because of improving tax revenue.

CIB’s proposed 2012 budget up for approval by the City-County Council on Oct. 17 is $77.5 million, up $4.4 million from this year.
Board member Michael McQuillen, who also is a City-County Councilor, doesn’t think the entire NBA season will be canceled. But if it is, he wants to ensure CIB is prepared to absorb the shortfall.

“I wouldn’t say the budget is rosy, but it’s solid,” he said. “I think [CIB is] doing a good enough job where the loss won’t be devastating, but $5 million [in CIB and state revenue] is $5 million.”

Life without a Pacers season has been on the minds of city leaders for several years, as team executives complained of multimillion-dollar losses and hinted that the franchise might need to move elsewhere.

In 2010, the CIB agreed to subsidize the Pacers's operation of Conseco Fieldhouse to the tune of $33.5 million over three years. Some opponents of the funding argued that the team, founded here in 1967, should fold or move to another city if it couldn’t be financially viable on its own.

“I guess it’s a case of being careful what you wish for,” Mark Rosentraub, a former IUPUI dean who has written two books about professional sports operations, said in an August interview with IBJ. “If Indianapolis loses the Pacers even for a season, it won’t be at all good economically for the city.”

Losing the team for a year would wipe out about $55 million in economic activity, according to a 2010 study done by Chicago-based Hunden Strategic Partners for the CIB.

The impact would stem from less money being spent at restaurants, bars and hotels, as well as to decreases in the Pacers’ payroll and diminished tax revenue for units of government.

“There’s going to be a real economic hit, and we’re going to feel that pretty quickly once we start losing games,” CIB President Ann Lathrop said earlier this summer.

“This city is also going to lose out on some significant branding opportunities (through television broadcasts and media mentions) without the Pacers and I think a sense of community pride,” Lathrop added. “It’s a lot more than just money.”

Downtown businesses have been bracing for a financial hit for months, anticipating a shortened or eliminated 2011-2012 season.

“For us, it would be a huge loss,” said Troy Gregory, general manager of Mo’s, a steakhouse a block north of Conseco Fieldhouse, earlier this summer. “There are games, including those when the Pacers play teams like Miami, Chicago, Boston or Los Angeles, where we do at least as much business as we would during a Colts home game.”

On big game nights, Gregory said revenue more than quadruples compared with a normal night.

“It would be a really big impact on us, and we’re far from alone,” Gregory said. “We’re hoping games don’t get canceled, but from what we hear, it doesn’t sound good.”

Downtown restaurant owners interviewed by IBJ estimated they each could lose as much as $500,000 without a Pacers season.

Parking lot operators also would take a big hit, with several around the arena saying they’d lose from $25,000 to $100,000 depending on the size of the lot and proximity to the arena, which dictates rates.

While hotels generally don’t see a lot of business from Pacers games, the Conrad does. The high-end hotel on Washington Street downtown has contracts with 23 of the NBA’s 29 teams that play here.

“It’s a good piece of business for us, and naturally, we’d hate to lose it,” said Greg Tinsley, the hotel’s general manager.

Tinsley said each team uses about 40 hotel rooms. The cancellation of an entire regular NBA season would cost the Conrad about 1,600 room nights. Though Tinsley wouldn’t say what the financial hit would be, it would likely be more than $500,000 after tallying room rates, meals and other charges.

The Pacers were scheduled to play 41 regular season home games and four pre-season games at Conseco Fieldhouse in the 2011-2012 season. So far, all preseason games have been canceled, as well as the Pacers' first seven games.

Including its playoff games last year, the Pacers drew about 620,000 people through the turnstiles in the 2010-2011 season.

Regardless of how many games are canceled, the CIB in January will give the Pacers the second of three $10 million installments to offset Conseco Fieldhouse operating expenses. The payment is related to building expenses at Conseco Fieldhouse, not operating the team, Lathrop said.


  • Lost Money
    The money that is lost is the 33.5 million paid to Pacers by the CIB. Of course the Pacers receive 1005 of any profits from events held at Conseco per their contract, we pay them if they pay and we play them if they don't play.
  • 10 for 5?
    The CIB shells out $10 million a year to get $5 back? AND they're paying it out even if there's not a season?! Great negotiating. Next mayor ("that's not going to do business the same way").
  • Disposable Income
    Tony is exactly correct. We're just talking about moving money around the metro area. No money is lost. Just reallocated.
  • Downtown may suffer...
    however, anything that was usually spent by a resident fan remains as disposable income that the fan may spend however they choose. Some folks might be able to do some major renovation projects with the money they won't spend. I don't see this as an economic loss so much as a reallocation away from the city center. Other than visiting fans, the money spent downtown does not disappear.
  • Read the last line
    It states the CIB will make another $10 Million dollar payment to the Pacers for Conseco operating costs even if there isn't a single game played. It should cost a lot less for lighting and heating if the building isn't used most of the winter. It looks like the Simons will make out just fine. I'm so glad the City decided to cough up an extra $33 Million over three years.
  • If the season is gone...
    ...do they have to pay back that bailout the city gave them last year? Probably not.
  • NBA Season
    The loss would be a hit but by next year the Pacers would be a memory and we adjust djusts without them. Then if the Simons threaten to leave, we can say "so long" we've adjusted and you've learned a very valuable lesson and your leverage is gone. The NBA doesn't matter anymore.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. This is still my favorite Mexican restaurant in town. What I do love about the new version is it is much quieter than the most recent version. TV's were off, the music wasn't too loud, and the wait staff were not hyperactive like they had been the past few times I had been there. I just wish they would bring back the MOLE for the enchiladas!

  2. Not a bad paper. There is a need for local community news and city government issues. Don't really need the owner's constant national political rants. We all know where they stand by now.

  3. What nice people. Menard should've known better than to team up with the guy who robbed and drove Conseco to ashes. I'm surprised Timothy Durham isn't involved in this.

  4. Hello, I am Maris Peters, currently living in Texas city, USA. I am a widow at the moment with three kids and i was stuck in a financial situation in August 2014 and i needed to refinance and pay my bills. I tried seeking loans from various loan Companies both private and corporate but never with success, and most banks declined my credit. But as God would have it, I was introduced to a Man of God a private loan lender who gave me a loan of $65,000USD and today am a business owner and my kids are doing well at the moment, if you must contact any firm or company with reference to securing a loan without collateral , no credit check, no co signer with just 2% interest rate and better repayment plans and schedule, please contact Mr William David. He doesn’t know that am doing this but am so happy now and i decided to let people know more about him and also i want God to bless him more.You can contact him through his email: Davidloanfirm@yahoo.com

  5. It is beyond me how anyone can think this was a "bad deal" for the state! If they could take the money back then, yes, but they can't! Protections were built in the agreement. Now, if they roll the roads up and take them away, I will agree that it was a bad deal. Otherwise, the only way to have paid for the infrastructure that was badly needed was for the state to issue bonds....that is a four letter synonym for debt folks!!