IBJOpinion

MARCUS: Don't learn economics from announcers

Morton Marcus
January 2, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Morton Marcus

Before you arrived, she stood up to put on her coat.

“I can’t stand you anymore,” she said. “You distort reality and transform it into a perverse fiction made of silly putty.”

“That’s Silly Putty,” I said. “Crayola owns the trademark and I don’t think fiction, as usually conceived, can be made of Silly Putty.”

“That’s so sick,” she exploded, “so typical of your usual wordplay to avoid facing the issues.”

“No,” I said firmly, “it is the kindest way I can respond to your misunderstanding of how our economy works. Let’s review what just happened.

“You said government taxes take money out of the economy and therefore away from businesses and households. That is either persistent ignorance at best or an irresponsible lie at worst.”

“You’re calling me a liar,” she said, piercing me with flaming eyes.

“If you thought about it,” I said, “you would see the error of that thinking, no matter how often it is repeated. If you pay a dollar in taxes, what do governments do with it?”

“That’s easy,” she said. “Governments spend every dollar they can get.”

“And how do they spend it?” I asked and proceeded to answer my own question. “They buy goods and services from the private sector, from businesses and households. And they also hire people directly to work for government, people who spend their wages in the private economy.”

“Yes,” she admitted, “but I’ve always heard that government spending is not as productive as private spending. Government, Paul Harvey used to say, doesn’t create wealth.”

“Exactly,” I snapped back, “you and millions learned economics from Paul Harvey and other radio-TV personalities. Government spending is just like business spending. Both hire labor and both buy supplies from the private sector. Some government spending goes for services with immediate benefits, like snow and garbage removal; other government spending is for long-term investments like education and sewers.”

“Well,” she said, “that makes some sense, but what about all that government spending on unnecessary things?”

“What is more unnecessary,” I said, “than most of the things we bought this past holiday season?”

“But that was our own money,” she protested. “We have every right to spend our own money as we want.”

“You have that right,” I agreed, “but that does not mean you made the right choices. Instead of that extra box of toys for your nieces and nephews, you could have donated the money to the public library for books that could be enjoyed by all the boys and girls of this town.”

“That’s socialism,” she shrieked.

“No,” I responded vigorously, “that is good citizenship as promoted by religious people worldwide. That is thinking and acting beyond your own circle of friends and family.”

“But the library is supported by taxes,” she said. “Why should I give them more money when they already have my money?”

“Because,” I said patiently, “you don’t support the library or most government services with adequate taxes for them to do the job we expect of them.”

“Well,” she pouted, “now we’re on ground I understand. Do you see how many people work in the library? Certainly they could do with fewer employees. They need to cut the fat.”

I waited a moment before saying, “You don’t know what those employees do. Take a few hours to visit any government office and find out what the workers do. Then talk to me about ‘fat’.

“And,” I probably should not have said, “let’s go to your place of work to see how many of your private-sector employees are loafing, useless leeches. Maybe a good analyst would define you as ‘expendable fat.’”

That’s when she left and you came in.•

__________

Marcus taught economics for more than 30 years at Indiana University and is the former director of IU’s Business Research Center. His column appears weekly. He can be reached at mmarcus@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • yes we need libraries
    To the question, do we even need libraries in the digital age, the answer is yes.
    Libraries are much more than places to read books, magazines, etc. They are cultural repositories that cannot be replicated online.
    One example: The music floor of the new Indianapolis Marion County Public Library has the complete scores for every instrument of dozens of operas, and also has original programs of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra dating far back into the 20th century.
    Another example: walking through the library stacks, one is exposed to so much more than one would find randomly searching the Internet or even with a directed search.
    So yes, we need libraries.
  • Economics from Announcers
    What Marcus fails to grasp is that at-least with private industry and my own money I not only have a choice I actually get to make the choice. In his world we appoint bureaucrats and academics to run our lives and make bad decisions for us. In the real world the question is, in the information age with internet access and e-readers at our disposal, do we even need libraries. I might read his column again someday but only out of morbid curiosity.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

  2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

  3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

  4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.

ADVERTISEMENT