IBJNews

Mercer courts employers with private exchange

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Mercer, the New York-based health benefits broker, has started offering a new health insurance exchange as a way for employers to offer more choices and potentially lower costs to their workers.

The Mercer Marketplace will offer health coverage from four companies—Aetna Inc., Cigna Corp., UnitedHealthcare and Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield.

Indianapolis-based Anthem also started its own health insurance marketplaces this year in Indiana and eight other states. Anthem expects the exchanges to serve employers covering about 30,000 people.

The exchange concept is a centerpiece of President Obama’s 2010 health reform law, especially as a way for individuals to buy health coverage with federal subsidies. However, most Indiana employers are shying away from the public exchanges and instead eyeing private exchanges run by individual health insurers or by brokers like Mercer and Aon Hewitt.

Employer interest appears to be particularly high in Indiana. In a 2012 survey of employers by Mercer, 41 percent of Indiana companies with 500 workers or more said they would use a private exchange to offer health benefits.

Nationally, 29 percent of employers with more than 500 workers said they would consider a private exchange. And interest was even higher among smaller employers.

“We’re definitely seeing an interest,” said Andrew Rosenberg, the leader of Mercer’s health and benefits practice in Indianapolis. He said he has had six meetings with employers in the past two weeks, although no employer has committed to use the exchange to offer health benefits in 2014.

Mercer’s exchange will offer five standardized health plans from each of the four companies. The exchange will accept only employers with 100 or more workers.

The main selling point for the private exchanges is that they could help employers control and possibly even reduce costs for health benefits.

Employers that use a private exchange would contribute money into an account on the exchange for each worker—more for those seeking family coverage and less for those seeking single coverage. This is called “defined contribution” health benefits, as opposed to the “defined benefit" that most employers now purchase for their workers.

Using a defined contribution strategy, employers could then increase that contribution by a set amount each year—effectively shifting the risk of fast-rising health insurance premiums onto workers.

In a presentation Rosenberg makes to employers, a fictional company paying an average of $7,800 for health benefits for each of its 1,000 workers could save $5 million over five years by increasing its defined contributions just 3 percent per year—as opposed to a more typical 7-percent increase that many employers have experienced in the recent past.

“Really, cost is what gets people’s attention,” Rosenberg said. He added that Mercer Marketplace hopes to achieve savings for employers by aggregating their buying power with health insurers.

Whether the defined contribution approach goes down well with workers remains to be seen. One reason it might, Rosenberg noted, is that the private exchange gives workers more insurance policies to choose from—which may help them avoid paying for unneeded coverage.

For example, a single worker without a spouse and with no plans to have children could choose a policy that does not offer maternity coverage, thus reducing his or her premiums. Right now, maternity coverage is fairly standard in employer-sponsored health plans.

“We know that most employees are over-insured and that they would select less-rich benefits, given the option,” Rosenberg said.

Also, Indianapolis-area hospital systems are now forming “narrow networks” that will offer cheaper premiums if a worker and his or her dependents seek care only from that one hospital system.

Rosenberg noted that Mercer Marketplace will handle the enrollment for all kinds of insurance an employer may offer to its workers. This could include not only health benefits, but also dental, vision, life, accident, auto, home, critical illness and even pet insurance.

Mercer Marketplace will charge an administration fee, and Mercer will still earn money through employer fees or through commissions from insurers, which are passed on to employers as part of their premiums.

“This is not the end-all of benefits, Rosenberg said. “It’s an option. It’s an option we think can help reduce costs, simplify administration.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT