IBJNews

My Health Care Manager wins $1.25M to improve software

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

Indianapolis-based My Health Care Manager has won a nearly $1.2 million grant from the National Institutes of Health to help it further develop its software system that helps seniors and their care givers navigate the health care system.

My Health Care Manager will collaborate with the Indiana University School of Informatics at IUPUI to add text-based searching capabilities so its software can find the latest research on geriatric health issues and the latest information from senior care agencies.
 

OTB healthcare The Indiana University School of Informatics in Indianapolis will help My Health Care Manager improve its software. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

The software, called Senior Care Navigation System, or SCANS, is known technically as an automated knowledge acquisition system. It scans databases of medical research articles and other resources in order to present care givers—whether nurses or family members—with recommended actions and tools to make decisions about the senior they are caring for.

“We are losing billions of hours and dollars in lost productivity as families struggle to provide much-needed assistance for loved ones based upon fragmented, incomplete and outdated information,” said Jane Niederberger, president of My Health Care Manager, in a statement.

Also supporting the effort, with a $75,000 grant, is the Indiana Economic Development Corp. Two years ago, the state’s main economic development agency helped fund the creation of My Health Care Manager’s software with a $1.9 million grant from the Indiana 21st Century Research and Technology Fund.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT