IBJNews

NCAA, ex-college players ordered to hold settlement talks

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The National Collegiate Athletic Association and ex-college athletes have been ordered to hold settlement talks in a lawsuit claiming the Indianapolis-based NCAA illegally blocks student players from profiting from the use of their images.

The players are seeking a share of $800 million a year in licensing fees for televised games in a lawsuit in Oakland, Calif. U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken on Friday ordered both sides to meet with a magistrate judge in San Francisco for a settlement conference addressing the players’ antitrust and right-of-publicity claims.

The NCAA could face trial in June in the lawsuit by football and basketball players, part of a movement by college athletes to secure compensation and control over their images in a system that considers them amateurs. Wilken said Feb. 20 that a trial is needed after lawyers from each side tried to persuade her to rule in their favor without one.

NCAA says it doesn’t prevent players from profiting from their student athletic career once they leave school, and claims that its system of amateurism is legal and benefits students and fans.

The players allege that the NCAA conspires through contracts and other means to block them from negotiating their own licensing deals. Electronic Arts Inc. had also been sued along with NCAA for using student players’ images and likenesses in video games. The company has settled the case, although no agreement has yet been filed for Wilken’s approval.

Wilken huddled privately in the courtroom with attorneys for the NCAA, EA and players after a hearing last week for a discussion about settlement prospects.

“The NCAA will of course participate in the court-ordered mediation, however, we will continue to protect the core principles of the collegiate model,” Donald Remy, the group’s chief legal officer, said Friday in an e-mail.

Mike Hausfeld, an attorney for the players, didn’t immediately respond to a voice-mail message seeking comment on the order.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • NCAA vs Athletes
    I think the entire system has been corrupted enough. Two thoughts: 1. Administer all NCAA I through III athletics in the manner which NCAA III is administered today. This would better assure that the term "Student-Athlete" would be the appropriate emphasis on the STUDENT portion of this term. 2. If athletes leave school prior to their graduating class, let's drop that scholarship from the school until that class would normally be graduated (4 years). This would also address the crazy "one and done" NCAA Division I Basketball rule forced on colleges by the NBA.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If what you stated is true, then this article is entirely inaccurate. "State sells bonds" is same as "State borrows money". Supposedly the company will "pay for them". But since we are paying the company, we are still paying for this road with borrowed money, even though the state has $2 billion in the bank.

  2. Andrew hit the nail on the head. AMTRAK provides terrible service and that is why the state has found a contractor to improve the service. More trips, on-time performance, better times, cleanliness and adequate or better restrooms. WI-FI and food service will also be provided. Transit from outlying areas will also be provided. I wouldn't take it the way it is but with the above services and marketing of the service,ridership will improve and more folks will explore Indy and may even want to move here.

  3. They could take the property using eminent domain and save money by not paying the church or building a soccer field and a new driveway. Ctrwd has monthly meetings open to all customers of the district. The meetings are listed and if the customers really cared that much they would show. Ctrwd works hard in every way they can to make sure the customer is put first. Overflows damage the surrounding environment and cost a lot of money every year. There have been many upgrades done through the years to help not send flow to Carmel. Even with the upgrades ctrwd cannot always keep up. I understand how a storage tank could be an eye sore, but has anyone thought to look at other lift stations or storage tanks. Most lift stations are right in the middle of neighborhoods. Some close to schools and soccer fields, and some right in back yards, or at least next to a back yard. We all have to work together to come up with a proper solution. The proposed solution by ctrwd is the best one offered so far.

  4. Fox has comments from several people that seem to have some inside information. I would refer to their website. Changed my whole opionion of this story.

  5. This place is great! I'm piggy backing and saying the Cobb salad is great. But the ribs are awesome. $6.49 for ribs and 2 sides?! They're delicious. If you work downtown, head over there.

ADVERTISEMENT