Humane Society clinic to open with even bigger goal in mind

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

With a new low-cost pet-vaccination clinic ready to open, the Humane Society of Indianapolis has turned its attention to the costlier second phase of its project.

The Albert G. and Sara I. Reuben Vaccination Clinic awaits final inspection, then doors will open to the public Monday, Aug. 27, at 456 Holmes Ave., in the Haughville neighborhood west of downtown

A $250,000 gift from the Reubens covered the cost of the first set of renovations and equipment purchases at the roughly 10,000-square-foot IndyHumane Animal Welfare Center. The building previously housed a bakery, restaurant and car-repair shop. The clinic will employ up to five staff members and additional volunteers.

The first phase of the pet-care center is a step forward in the group’s effort to better reach out to areas of the city where the stray-animal population is especially high, said IndyHumane CEO John Aleshire.

The humane society identified 10 ZIP codes that account for about 75 percent of the 18,000 animals sent to Indianapolis Animal Care & Control each year. The new clinic is in one of those ZIP codes and close to most of the other ones. It will target those areas in its outreach efforts.

Low-income pet owners are the target market for the clinic, but there are no income restrictions for the service. Vaccinations will run between $15 and $37.

Earnings will help cover the costs of the second phase of the Animal Welfare Center, a low-cost spay-neuter clinic. The vaccination clinic’s finances should be in the black by the seventh or eighth month of operation, Aleshire said.

The humane society needs a little more than $750,000 in profit and donations to further renovate the building, buy equipment and hire four or five additional people for the spay-neuter clinic.

Animal advocates say spay-neuter clinics have proven to be an effective way to reduce stray-animal populations in cities throughout the country. In Indianapolis, euthanasia rates have fallen by more than half since the city's first high-volume, low-cost spay-neuter clinic opened in 1999.

“In many ways, for slightly more than $1 million, we can change animal welfare forever,” Aleshire said.

Aleshire hopes to raise the $750,000 within the year. It should take about two months to open the spay-neuter clinic after IndyHumane has secured the funding, he said.

The humane society is already seeing between 30 and 40 pet owners a day—or roughly 10,000 a year—at its vaccination clinic on Michigan Road. Aleshire expects similar numbers on Holmes Avenue.

On the spay-neuter side, the organization anticipates 5,000 to 6,000 visitors the first year. That likely will grow to more than 10,000 by the third year, Aleshire said.

The humane society has not yet determined pricing for the surgeries, he said. Other low-cost clinics typically charge $20 to $25 for cats and $30 to $55 for dogs.

The animal welfare center will also house four of the humane society’s partners: Spay-Neuter Services of Indiana, Friends of Indianapolis Dogs Outside, Indy Pit Crew and Casa Del Toro.

Besides medical services, the Animal Welfare Center’s resident organizations will provide educational outreach services.

“We find that people really want to do the right thing if they know what the right thing is,” Aleshire said.


  • Non surgical neutering
    I am sure the Humane Society is aware of the soon to be released injectable sterilization product for male dogs. It contains zinc gluconate neutralized with arginine is scheduled for release in the U.S. by the end of this year under the brand name Zeuterin ("zinc neutering"). The product is already in use in Bolivia, Columbia, Mexico and Panama under another name. The drug is effective for permanent sterilization of male dogs at least three months of age. Zeuterin has been approved by the FDA for use in dogs three to ten months of age and can be obtained only by licensed veterinarians who have received training from the drug's manufacturer, Ark Sciences, in how to perform the injections. The manufacturer believes the drug will be approved for use in dogs of any age over three months before the U.S. release date. I hope the cost is such that the Humane Society and other low cost spay neuter clinics can offer this.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  2. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  3. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  4. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

  5. I live downtown Indy and had to be in downtown Chicago for a meeting. In other words, I am the target demographic for this train. It leaves at 6:00-- early but doable. Then I saw it takes 5+ hours. No way. I drove. I'm sure I paid 3 to 5 times as much once you factor in gas, parking, and tolls, but it was reimbursed so not a factor for me. Any business traveler is going to take the option that gets there quickly and reliably... and leisure travelers are going to take the option that has a good schedule and promotional prices (i.e., Megabus). Indy to Chicago is the right distance (too short to fly but takes several hours to drive) that this train could be extremely successful even without subsidies, if they could figure out how to have several frequencies (at least 3x/day) and make the trip in a reasonable amount of time. For those who have never lived on the east coast-- Amtrak is the #1 choice for NY-DC and NY-Boston. They have the Acela service, it runs almost every hour, and it takes you from downtown to downtown. It beats driving and flying hands down. It is too bad that we cannot build something like this in the midwest, at least to connect the bigger cities.