New state law might idle school bus fleets

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A state law intended to make sure cash-strapped public school districts pay their debt could have an unintended consequence: permanently parking the yellow buses that deliver students to class.

Nearly 60 school corporations across Indiana stand to lose at least 20 percent of the tax revenue collected for transportation, bus replacement and capital projects (think building maintenance and technology upgrades) because of so-called protected levy legislation set to take effect this year.

Five districts—including four in central Indiana—are facing reductions of 90 percent or more.

school buses School districts are lobbying the Legislature for a budgeting change that would keep their buses running. (IBJ photo/Andrea Muirragui Davis)

Officials in two of them, Westfield Washington Schools and Beech Grove City School Corp., have notified the state Department of Education that they will discontinue school transportation in three years unless the funding situation is resolved.

The Metropolitan School District of Decatur Township’s board, meanwhile, just authorized a May referendum that will ask taxpayers for another $3.85 million a year to make up a multimillion-dollar budget shortfall. If it fails, the district “could join the other school districts across the state that must reduce or eliminate transportation,” Superintendent Matt Prusiecki said in a prepared statement.

And across town in Franklin Township, which eliminated its transportation program during the 2011-2012 school year and then reinstated it following outcry from parents, officials may need to cut classroom expenses to free up the $4 million a year the district needs to keep its buses running.

“We’ve got to find the money somehow,” said Chad Blacklock, chief financial officer of the 8,500-student district. “Show me another business that loses 38.5 percent of its revenue in a single year and keeps its doors open. We don’t have a choice.”

State tax caps wiped out $17 million of Franklin Township Community School Corp.’s $44.3 million property tax levy in 2013, Blacklock said. Under the old law, the district could spread the losses over several tax-supported funds, including debt service, school pension debt, capital projects, transportation and bus replacement.

But legislation passed in 2012 took away that flexibility, requiring that school property taxes be applied to debt payments before any other expenses. The other funds get whatever is left—if anything.

Costerison Costerison

If the change stands, Franklin Township and Beech Grove are expected to lose all their capital projects, transportation and bus replacement taxes to debt service. Decatur Township and Westfield Washington could keep less than 10 percent of their non-debt levies.

“We know that is not the intent of the General Assembly,” said Denny Costerison, executive director of the Indiana Association of School Business Officials. “We’re trying to find a way to transition through this, to lessen the blow of protected taxes.”

School corporations with high debt, declining assessed value and a large proportion of residential taxpayers are feeling the biggest sting.

A pair of bills making their way through the Legislature aim to address the problem by reverting to the previous share-the-pain approach. Senate Bill 70 recently got a hearing and is on hold pending amendments, and House Bill 1062 is up for discussion Jan. 21 at the House Ways and Means Committee.

Legislators failed to pass similar legislation in 2013, instead agreeing to delay implementation of the protected-levy law until this year. Costerison said the 2012 measure was not necessary, since Indiana already requires school corporations to pay their debt or lose state funding.

“This is an allocation issue. We’re not asking for more money,” said Mike Reuter, chief financial officer of Hamilton Southeastern Schools in Fishers.

Still, schools statewide have been pinching pennies since tax caps were put in place in 2009. With tax payments limited to 1, 2 or 3 percent of a property’s assessed valuation—and values dropping as a result of the nationwide housing bust—even fast-growing districts like Hamilton Southeastern have had to find ways to do more with less.

school-bus-table.gifAlthough Fishers schools aren’t among the hardest-hit by the protected levy law, officials already are looking for ways to cut $5 million from its budget. Losing flexibility in its tax-supported funds will only complicate the process.

Decatur Township schools lost $6 million to tax caps last year and officials expect that to increase to $7.5 million in 2014. Before protected levies, the district made up a $650,000 shortfall in its transportation fund by tapping its general fund and “rainy day” savings. With the change, the gap will grow to $2.2 million—leaving just $250,000 to operate buses.

Officials have reduced expenditures more than $12 million over the past three years, said Prusiecki, who became superintendent in August.

“Our past practice has been to make the budget work,” he said. “But after $12 million of cuts, there’s not much left we can do indirectly.”

If the referendum does not pass, Prusiecki said the school board will have to consider closing schools and eliminating staff. It has not yet considered passing a resolution to discontinue transportation—a step the state requires—but he said members will discuss that at their February meeting.

“We didn’t want to do that concurrently with the referendum,” he said. “We’re looking for ways to maintain the services we currently provide.”

Westfield Washington’s resolution, which passed 4-1 in September, said the district will “investigate” the possibility of another operating referendum (voters in 2010 approved an extra 23-cent tax per $100 of assessed valuation), but “unless sufficient revenue is generated,” it will stop transporting students after Dec. 31, 2016.

Superintendent Mark Keen called the idea of going back to Westfield taxpayers for help “unacceptable,” saying they already contribute more than they get back in public services.

“Wealthy communities do not have wealthy schools,” he said.

And the alternatives are equally untenable: Ask the state’s Distressed Units Appeals Board for permission to restructure all the district’s debt—extending payments in the process—or cut expenses to free up the $3.2 million in lost transportation funding (not to mention $3.5 million for building maintenance).

Already grappling with the impact of almost $7 million in annual tax-cap losses and a steep drop in assessed valuation due to business closures tied to the U.S. 31 construction project, the district said it doesn’t have much fat left to trim.

“We’ve reduced expenses so many ways, but we have not touched classroom teachers yet,” Keen said. “Our job is to educate kids. To cut back on that to pay for transportation seems ludicrous.”

The clock is ticking on Westfield’s buses, but the superintendent is hopeful a legislative remedy will allow the district to reverse course. Asking students to walk to class is far from ideal, he said, and schools were not designed to accommodate the heavy traffic that would result from daily parent drop-offs.

“It’s a huge safety issue,” he said.

Parking the buses—or any of the unsavory alternatives—also could affect economic development in the growing community.

“Who’s going to want to move to Westfield if we don’t transport kids to school?” Keen asked. “If we have 35 kids in a class? If we have a high referendum rate? … One of the main reasons people come here is our schools.”

Costerison is focused on resolving the protected-levy issue, which he said affects districts of all sizes through the state.

“It’s a real negative,” he said, and it’s important to find a solution that minimizes the impact outside schools’ business offices. “Bottom line, what is the impact on students? That’s what we’re about here.”•



  • School Budget Cutting is a Farce
    The good old boy network and ingrained bureaucracy of school boards makes it virtually impossible to consistently cut expenses. School leaders have to deal with 5 to 10 "decision makers" who are more concerned with keeping local friend happy than cutting expenses. The only way to force expense cuts is to cap what they can spend. We have products which save schools hundreds of thousands of dollars but face an uphill battle in every deal due to the existing relationships and the aversion to change in so many schools. Administrators take the status quo...they don't want to upset the rythym of things and risk ruffling feathers!
  • Walk/ride
    CB is right - busing should not be a huge expense for our schools. If our city planners had any foresight at all, this issue could have been avoided by careful planning, ensuring our children could walk, ride their bike, or ride transit safely to school. Kids do it around the world every day. And before everyone starts calling me a green-minded hippie, just think about that lifestyle (and the decreased strain on public and private resources) for a second.
  • One Solution Comes To Mind
    There is a way to create tens of millions if not hundreds of millions in annual revenue, thousands of jobs, while even decreasing state expenses... all of which can help fill these budget deficits. What is that you ask? Go ask Colorado and Washington (state) for the answer.
  • Just saying
    Couple things busing is not a vital for education. Parents can deliver their kids to school. Franklin Twp. was the only Marion Co. school with perfect 4.0 A rating. We should embrace that schools are able to expose these kids with the tech and experiences they need to succeed, unless you want them working at McD's or a life on welfare. The US rates pretty low in education because more people whine about facilities (and life's not fair, whan) more than parenting and helping their kids excel in the classroom.
  • Concerned
    I'll second that, Leisa. How can there be any uproar over this when we have turf fields for elementary schools and flat-screen TVs in the hallways? The time is coming to pay up for these mistakes, and unfortunately kids and parents are going to be left with the consequences.
  • Let's Keep Decisionmaking At Local Level
    For a Republican Governor and Republication-controlled state legislature that espouses limited government and local rule, they just can't keep their hands out of the locals' backyards because they know best, particularly if involves funding. If local school district officials make bad decisions, lets let the voters at the local level hold them accountable for what they do and how they spend money. And, the legislature should not pass any laws if it does not know how the law impacts constituents and students.
  • Not gonna happen
    Schools are not going to stop bus service. This is an exercise in futility.
  • One Approach
    Each School Corporation can determine what it actually costs to transport students each year, the costs associated with maintaining school buses to a level that presents each bus as "Safe to Transport Students on Indiana Roads" and the costs associated with replacement and/or new purchases, and then offer parents of school bus riders various options. One option might be; Pay a monthly or annual fee for each student riding the bus, or Option Two: parents can elect to drop-off and pick-up students each day. If a school corporations elects to eliminate school bus transport services (Three Year Notice Required) I believe there will be private companies standing ready to purchase or lease existing school bus fleets, and offer school districts and parents the options of Pay For Services Provided. It appears that the Governor and Legislature will be receiving the next punt, so they better have a good offensive series planned, or immediately go back to a defensive scheme.
  • At some point sanity needs to break out!
    While I generally support tax reduction I fear we are reaching the point of diminishing returns. It is implausible to believe our Legislators thought through the implications of this change in State Law. This with Governor Pence's proposed phase-out of Indiana’s business personal property tax, which collected approximately $630 million in 2009 will put even more stress on local economies. What happened to continuous incremental change?
  • Costs!!
    Well, this is the result of these districts running up high debt to build these expensive facilities. Just look at some of the administrative buildings, sports facilities that they have done in the past ten years, and that is what is costing them. Do you really need marble floors and an atrium to run a school district, Franklin Township?

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............