NFL owners lobby in advance of big vote

Anthony Schoettle
May 20, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

ATLANTA - The streets of Atlanta's Buckhead district were quiet late last night, but the atmosphere inside the Ritz-Carlton was like a New Year's Eve party.

The 32 NFL team owners met and mingled mostly behind closed doors, but the entourages spilled into the lobby and bar area as officials from Indianapolis, Houston and Phoenix made their final lobbying efforts to land the Super Bowl in 2012.

Local TV stations, meanwhile, did live shots just outside the hotel for their late-night news.

The Indianapolis contingent rehearsed its presentation one last time from 9 p.m. to 10 p.m. A sub-committee of team owners met earlier yesterday and gave Indianapolis leaders feedback on the written portion of their bid.

Central Indiana Corporate Partnership President Mark Miles, who is leading the local contingent, said there would be few adjustments to today's presentation.

Local leaders outlined a number of Indianapolis' strengths in an executive summary released to the media early this morning.

One point not mentioned in the bid but nevertheless discussed yesterday by locals was the importance of the $10 million indoor connector linking the new Lucas Oil Stadium to the expanded Indiana Convention Center and nearby hotels. David Frick, Indiana Stadium and Convention Building Authority chairman, said the connector is critical to Indianapolis' landing the 2012 game.

Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay and other owners arrived with little fanfare around 7 a.m. today for a group breakfast before meetings began at 8 a.m. Owners slipped in side and back doors out of site of most media members.

Owners are tackling several other issues during the meetings, including the possible expansion of team rosters from 80 to 86 players and a proposed rule to require players with long hair to either cut it or tuck it up under the helmet.

One of the most crucial issues owners will discuss is the collective bargaining agreement that governs teams' salary cap. The salary cap - which stands at $116 million for the 2008 season - is critical, Irsay said, because it has a big impact on how competitive small market teams can remain.

In addition to negotiating with players over how much money each side gets, owners are at odds with each other, with large-market teams wanting to keep more of their own revenue and small-market teams like the Colts arguing for more revenue sharing among all the teams to maintain a level playing field.

Late this morning, word leaked out that owners had voted to shorten the collective bargaining agreement with players by two years, ending the agreement after the 2010 season.

The full impact of the termination is not yet clear, but league officials said the deal was shortened because its terms penalize teams for investing in new stadiums and other revenue-producing businesses.

Owners also were displeased because the current agreement lacked a rookie pay structure and does not deal with teams' ability to withhold bonuses from players who do not perform to their contracts.

Watch www.IBJ.com for news about the bowl bid.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

  2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

  3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

  4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

  5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.