IBJNews

Once-rising star AIT Laboratories now cutting jobs

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

AIT Laboratories, one of the area’s fastest-growing companies in recent years, confirmed Tuesday that it is eliminating jobs.

The Indianapolis-based forensics and clinical testing company won’t say how many people it fired this month or whether other cuts are coming.

President and CEO Michael Evans said in a prepared statement issued Tuesday that AIT is looking to “restructure our business.”

Evans did not return a phone call from IBJ seeking comment about the cutbacks.

“AIT remains a vigorous life sciences company,” he said in the prepared statement.

But the job cuts are a turnabout from 2010, when AIT said it planned to create as many as 160 jobs by 2014 and invest $74 million to equip a 90,000-square-foot building at Woodland Corporate Park as a new headquarters and lab. The Indiana Economic Development Corp. offered AIT up to $1.8 million in performance-based tax credits to help with the expansion.

Employment at AIT, founded in 1990, grew to nearly 500 people in recent years, but Evans said conditions are worsening in the health care sector.

“AIT has seen reimbursement from government and private payers reduced throughout 2011, which has had a negative financial impact on the company,” he said in the statement issued Tuesday.

In recent days, some pharmacy industry websites have been buzzing with talk about “massive” job cuts at AIT, with claims of as many as 100 furloughs. Company officials would not confirm or deny the numbers.

“This is the only statement that AIT Laboratories will be making. There will be no interviews,” said Raquel Bahamonde, company spokeswoman.

AIT had been a rising star in an otherwise depressed economy. In 2009, the company awarded $3 million in profit-sharing money to employees. Later that year, Evans transferred full ownership of the company to employees through an employee stock ownership plan, or ESOP.

At the end of 2010, AIT’s ESOP had 273 employee participants, according to federal records. The plan is intended to provide retirement benefits to eligible employees. The plan borrowed nearly $90 million to acquire company stock.

AIT is privately owned and does not report earnings. In 2009, company officials estimated revenue would rise to nearly $60 million, from $16 million in 2008.

Evans, who founded AIT as the American Institute of Toxicology Inc., has done well with the business. Last year, he donated $48 million to help construct the Marian University College of Osteopathic Medicine, prompting the Indianapolis college to name its medical school building after him.   

Last year AIT was named in a lawsuit, that has since been dismissed, by a Rhode Island competitor. The competitor, Dominion Diagnostics, alleged that AIT and two other laboratories submitted false and fraudulent claims for payment to Medicare and Medicaid.

The allegation involved enzyme immunoassay tests on urine samples sent by doctors to laboratories, which are then billed to the federal health care programs.

Dominion alleged the labs were providing the doctors urine-collection cups that typically cost about $7 for free to induce the doctors to use their labs. Dominion alleged the labs violated an anti-kickback statute.

Dominion said it provided information to the U.S. government, on whose behalf it also sued the labs.

Last March, the federal government filed a response to the suit, saying it would not intervene at the time because its “investigation has not yet been completed.”

The Justice Department has in recent years been taking a closer look at some laboratories, including Texas-based Ameritox, which was named along with AIT in Dominion’s lawsuit.

In 2010, the government reached a $16.3 million settlement with Ameritox to resolve allegations that Ameritox made cash payments to doctors to induce the referral of drug-testing services.

Dominion withdrew its lawsuit against AIT and competitors last April.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT