IBJNews

Pace of venture capital funding slows in Indiana, Midwest

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The pace of venture capital activity in Indiana slackened a bit in the first quarter, but by less than occurred in the rest of the Midwest.

Seven Indiana companies attracted cash infusions from venture capitalists, according to the latest data from consulting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers, the market research firm Thomson Reuters, and the National Venture Capital Association.

That number of deals was the same as in the fourth quarter of 2012, but an increase over the quarterly average from a year ago.

Indiana companies attracted $16.4 million in payments during the first quarter, according to Thomson Reuters data. Nearly all the money was paid out to Carmel-based ChaCha Search Inc., which secured a $14 million investment in January.

The Thomson Reuters data counts payments as they are actually made to companies, and does not record the total amount announced after a company conducts a round of fundraising.

The amount of VC money for Indiana was down 22 percent from the quarterly average of $21 million in 2012. Because individual states have a relatively low number of deals each quarter, IBJ tries to analyze the Thomson Reuters data annually or by comparing one quarter’s data to an average drawn from a full year’s data.

Venture capital deals have tended to slow down in the first quarters of recent years, according to Thomson Reuters.

Nationwide, dollars paid out to venture-backed companies fell by 13 percent in the first quarter, compared with the average quarterly total from 2012. In all, venture capitalists paid out $5.9 billion in the quarter, compared with a quarterly average of $6.7 billion last year.

Deal volume also fell nationally, declining 8 percent from last year’s quarterly average, to 863.

“Lower investment levels in the first quarter were driven by a number of factors, none of which were unexpected," said John Taylor, head of research for the National Venture Capital Association, in a prepared statement. "The venture industry has been raising less capital than it has been investing now for several years. Ultimately, this dynamic flows through and manifests itself in lower investment levels overall.”

Taylor added that venture funding continues to flow more toward information technology companies, which require smaller amounts of cash, and away from clean tech and life sciences companies, which typically need larger investments.

In Indiana, four of the seven companies receiving venture capital payments last quarter were in the software industry. In addition to ChaCha, they were Indianapolis-based Cause.it Inc., Lafayette-based Emerging Threats Pro LLC, and West Lafayette-based Microfluidic Innovations Inc.

Two biotech companies received small investments. Indianapolis-based Algeon Inc. pulled in $250,000 from the BioCrossroads Seed Fund II, and West Lafayette-based Medtric Biotech LLC was given $100,000 by the Purdue Research Foundation.

“We expect these overall trends to continue until exits and subsequent fundraising activities pick up, and dollars start to flow back into more venture funds,” Taylor said.

In the Midwest, deal volume rose 8 percent in the first quarter, compared with the quarterly average from 2012. But the amount of dollars invested plunged by 65 percent, to $123.3 million.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT