The negotiations going on right now between the city and Indiana Pacers have as much to do with Lucas Oil Stadium as Conseco
Fieldhouse.
Sources close to Mayor Greg Ballard and the city’s Capital Improvement Board said much of the current debate over how
much money—if any—the city should give the Pacers or who should manage Conseco Fieldhouse dates back to planning
and construction of the $720 million new home for the Indianapolis Colts.
The Simons and the Pacers were supposed to be brought to the table during discussions of any developments downtown that could
affect their operations at Conseco Fieldhouse, sources within Ballard’s and former Mayor Bart Peterson’s administrations
told IBJ.
But their participation in Lucas Oil Stadium negotiations “fell through the cracks” as Peterson, a Democrat,
began bickering with Gov. Mitch Daniels, a Republican, and state lawmakers over who would pay for and operate the Colts’
new home, sources said. The stadium, which opened two years ago, also is a key adjunct to the Indiana Convention Center and
home to NCAA Final Fours and other major events.
A source within the Pacers told IBJ that there was angst early on about what the new multi-purpose stadium would
do to Pacers Sports & Entertainment’s business—especially non-basketball events—at Conseco Fieldhouse.
“[The Simons] knew a facility like Lucas Oil Stadium had the potential to really harm their business,” said Mark
Rosentraub, a former IUPUI dean and author of “Major League Losers,” a book about professional sports operations.
“So now, Lucas Oil Stadium is sucking a lot of money out of the market, and the Pacers and Conseco Fieldhouse are really
hurting.”
Rosentraub admitted that the Pacers’ own poor on-court performance, which has coincided with the worst economic swoon
in a generation, hasn’t helped the team’s finances.
Herb and Mel Simon bought the Pacers in 1983. Mel died in September 2009, and Herb is now the sole owner. Pacers officials
have shut off access to all media this week following public statements April 13 saying they would like an answer from the
city by June 30 regarding a request that the city assume the cost of operating the Fieldhouse.
Pacers President Jim Morris intimated in a April 14 Indianapolis Star story that Pacers officials could consider
moving the team if they don’t get the money they need to run the Fieldhouse.
Pacers officials two years ago informed city officials they need $15 million annually—or $150 million over the last
10 years of the Conseco Fieldhouse lease—to operate the 18,165-seat venue. Morris told IBJ that the Simons
have lost more than $200 million since buying the team, including $30 million during the 2008-09 season.
City officials have been slow to respond to the Pacers' request for help as they sort out their own fiscal crisis. The
city’s CIB owns Lucas Oil Stadium, Conseco Fieldhouse and the Indiana Convention Center.
CIB Treasurer Paul Okeson said Thursday that one possibility is the city taking over operations of Conseco Fieldhouse.
“We will be mindful of our responsibility to the facility,” Okeson told IBJ. “This isn’t
about giving money to the Pacers. It’s about the facility.”
Part of the deal to build Lucas Oil Stadium, Rosentraub said, should have included a regional taxing district that included
and protected both the stadium and Conseco Fieldhouse. Sources close to the Pacers said team officials thought the deal did
too much for the Colts at the expense of the Pacers.
Without a regional solutions to keep both facilities and franchises viable, Rosentraub doesn’t think it will matter
who operates Conseco Fieldhouse.
“Whoever manages it can’t increase the population of the region or the demand for event dates,” he said.
And he thinks it’s a foolhardy notion that Ballard and his staff would fare better than Pacers' ownership at running
Conseco Fieldhouse.
“You’re going to make the case the city can manage this facility better than the Pacers,” Rosentraub said.
“That’s nothing more than a political move. You think the Simons are sitting in Conseco Fieldhouse trying to lose
money? Very few people know how to make money as well as the Simons. The fact that the Simons are having problems there shows
there’s a fundamental problem.”
The fact that Lucas Oil Stadium has a growing reputation for its ability to handle a variety of events from music concerts
to basketball games hasn’t helped Pacers Sports & Entertainment, which relies on non-basketball event business at
Conseco Fieldhouse to bolster its balance sheet.
“They used to host 150 events a year at Conseco Fieldhouse,” Rosentraub said. “Now, it’s closer to
half that number.”
Rosentraub said the only way to preserve downtown is to develop a “regional solution and joint financing concept.”
“Conseco Fieldhouse and Lucas Oil Stadium have to be tied together,” Rosentraub said. “Those facilities
are a big part of bringing young, human capital downtown. And without that, the entire region doesn’t survive.”

















IBJ Conversations
26 Comments
Add Comment
That falls into the category of BOHICA (pronounced bow-hee-cuh)
Bend Over, Here It Comes Again.
If $imon wants to take the Pacers out of Indy, so be it.
Don't let the door hit you on your rear end on the way out.
Gee, Bill, why is it every economist out there disagrees with you that professional sports have a "major, positive effect on a city."
Seattle has done marvelously well without the Sonics. I am sure some residents miss attending basketball games, but they enjoy not having their pockets picked by a private enterprise even better.
The Pacers have zero leverage. The city has treated them very well for years. If the Simons are losing money, then they should fold the Pacers or move the team to another city where they think they can turn a buck. Of course, it would have to be a larger city than Indianapolis, since the whole argument from them has been that "it's hard to turn a profit in a small market." I doubt Seattle is going to offer them any hefty incentives to relocate, so good luck to them in their search.
Yes, they should consider all their options. But, what they shouldn't do is delude themselves into thinking they are going to get one more thin dime from the taxpayers' wallets. It's no longer business as usual, which in Indianapolis generally means signing the taxpayers' money away in back-room deals. Unfortunately, for the power brokers, the voters have had enough. Greg Ballard is already looking to be a one-term Mayor, and any give-away to the Pacers, will seal his fate, along with any other incumbents who would care to join him.
Now, here's another angle to consider. Why does Conseco so consistently miss out on major concert tours that similiar facilities in Columbus, OH or even say Omaha manage to snag? Whomever is responsible for getting a little agressive and trying to bring concerts into Conseco is doing a piss poor job. We just missed out on the Roger Waters tour which would have sold Conseco out. I could give you dozens of other examples of shows that are skipping Indy. We did a much better job of booking arena shows back in the MSA days and the first couple of years in Conseco. Indy has really fallen off the arena concert map in the last five or six years and this can't be helping matters.
Again, lets hear some specific events that went to Lucas that really would have been booked at Conseco before. There isn't a single concert where that's been the case. Plus, Conseco has gotten the enormous economic benefit in the last few years of having both the mens and womens Big Ten Tourneys. That is a huge economic plus that they didn't have in the first few years of Conseco.
Charlotte would've been better off to keep the Hornets, New Orleans the Jazz, and Seattle is trying to get back in the mix -- a big city, by the way, without a franchise and willing to deal with the Pacers.
It's why Baltimore paid dearly for the NFL to return, as well.
And, it's not just bigger cities we have to worry about. Do you believe Seattle really took the threat of Oklahoma City seriously before it was too late?
You might think it would be great if the Pacers leave -- but, I bet we would later believe it would've been a bargain if we could have kept them.
The truth is that it is not the responsibility of the taxpayers to subsidize the Pacers to ensure that they are profitable for billionaires like the Simons. If the Pacers cannot turn a profit, then like any other unprofitable business, they should go out of business. If the Pacers think they can find a better deal elsewhere, then by all means, they are welcome to pick up and leave; hopefully, the door won't slam too hard on their rear-ends.
When we have dilapidated public street, rundown public parks, failing public schools, and other crumbling public infrastructure, sports and entertainment deserve to sit on the back burner. The Pacers do not deserve any tax funds going there way, either directly or indirectly.
Let them sink or swim on there own.
The Simons may have lost money operationally on the Pacers, and I'm sure they took nice tax deductions because of it. Nevertheless, I suspect the market value of the team has steadily gone up by an amount that far exceed the accumulated losses.
http://www.ibj.com/pacers-playing-hardball-with-city-on-lease/PARAMS/article/19306
Huh?
The Pacers play 41 regular season games and another 4-5 preseason.
The Fever play 17 regular season games, at least one preseason and playoffs.
The Big Ten tournaments fill eight dates.
A glance at the CFH schedule shows about eight concerts or other events in just the next couple of month so, let's say on average, four of those a month would be 36 for the year.
Then there's the Wooden Tradition, high school basketball, IUPUI, Indiana Ice, commencements and other activities.
FFA uses the Fieldhouse for convocations about five days straight.
Add it all up, and it's far closer to the 150 than the 75 Rosentraub implies.
This doesn't change the challenges facing the Pacers and CFH. But it does challenge Rosentraub's credibility when he asserts something that isn't close to fact.
Just sayin'.
Sad part is that as usual the taxpayers are the ones paying for it in increased taxes and doublely in decreased services due to budget cuts because of this type of government management