IBJNews

Park Tudor land purchase puts stop to housing development

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An expansion of Park Tudor School’s campus has put an end to plans for an 11-lot gated housing development just south of 75th Street and College Avenue.

The private school recently bought the 5.7 acres north of its campus that Dr. Bill Nunery, a local ophthalmologist, had planned to develop into an upscale residential enclave known as Grace Hill.

Park Tudor bought the Nunery property and a house adjacent to the campus with $1.5 million in restricted gifts from anonymous donors, said Dr. Matthew Miller, Park Tudor’s head of school, in a statement distributed by the school.

Including the house, which will become a residence for the head of school, the real estate purchases will allow Park Tudor to expand the size of its 56-acre campus by 20 percent.

“We are deeply grateful for the gifts that allow Park Tudor to enlarge its borders,” said Miller, who started at the school July 1.

The school has no immediate plans for the Nunery property. Park Tudor is forming a committee that will spend several months considering what the campus expansion should include. When the committee’s work is finished, Park Tudor’s board of directors and a master planner will use the committee’s findings in developing a comprehensive plan for Park Tudor’s future.

The school’s purchase of the property brings to an abrupt end plans for Grace Hill that appeared to be on track as recently as September. In May, the city approved the plat for the development, allowing the sale of lots—all of which were less than a half acre—for between $325,000 and $395,000.

The wooded lots on undulating terrain were expected to be in big demand in densely populated Washington Township, where new-home sites are rare. Buyers of the lots would have had to abide by certain covenants attached to the property. For example, lot owners would have been required to have their house designs approved by an architectural review committee that was being set up, and construction had to start within a year of closing.

Nunery purchased the property 30 years ago from Park Tudor, which retained right of first refusal if Nunery decided to sell it in the future. His wife, Mathieu, said she and her husband didn't think Park Tudor was going to exercise its right and were within a week of breaking ground to install roads and sewers on the site when the school intervened in September.

She said they could have declined the school’s purchase offer for the entire parcel, but Park Tudor would have had the right to intervene on each individual lot sale.

“We’re disappointed we didn’t get to do Grace Hill as a development, but we’re happy Park Tudor got the land,” she said.

For Park Tudor, the property was its most obvious path to expansion. The school, which has 1,000 students in pre-kindergarten through 12th grade, is hemmed in on the south by 71st Street and on the east by College Avenue. There are houses to the west and northwest of the campus.

The listing agents for the Grace Hill lots, Mark Zukerman and Jeffrey Cohen of Encore Sotheby’s International Realty, didn’t return phone calls seeking comment on the unraveling of the residential plan.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Good...
    I'm glad Park got the land. We don't need any more housing developments...jeez.
  • Percentage is correct
    The 20 percent expansion reflects the addition of the Nunery property and another property mentioned in the story. The percentage is correct.
  • 20% Increase?
    I thought adding 5.7 acres to 56 was a 10% increase - not 20%. Oh well, great opportunity for Park Tudor.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

    2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

    3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

    4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

    5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

    ADVERTISEMENT