Parking key issue in Rolls-Royce's possible downtown move

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Rolls-Royce Corp.’s decision whether to move about 2,500 office employees to a former Eli Lilly and Co. downtown campus could hinge on three critical factors—parking, incentives and lease terms for the space.

Hanging in the backdrop is a $155 million mixed-use project proposed near Lilly’s Faris campus. City leaders say approval of the so-called North of South project could make the site more attractive for Rolls-Royce, but the project has been controversial among public officials who are expected to vote on it next month.

rollsIn November, Rolls-Royce, an aircraft engine-maker with more than 4,000 employees in Indianapolis, announced it had begun talks with Lilly about occupying its 465,000-square-foot Faris campus on South Meridian Street. Last summer, Lilly began relocating the 1,000 employees who worked there amid staff cuts and a push to consolidate employees.

Lilly began construction on its $58 million Faris campus in 2001 with development partner Kite Realty Group Trust, and it opened the following year. The campus includes the renovated Faris and Brougher buildings, a new 150,000-square-foot office building and a parking garage—all west of Meridian Street between Merrill and South streets.

Real estate experts say the new downtown space would be a big upgrade from London-based Rolls-Royce’s current half-dozen local facilities, which are spread across Indianapolis’ southwest side and in Plainfield.

But a move of this magnitude would be complex, with parking among the stickiest issues. The Faris garage can accommodate 1,550 cars, about 1,000 shy of the number of employees Rolls-Royce has discussed moving.

The critical questions are what the costs of moving will be, and whether the amenities that come with a downtown location merit them, real estate observers said.

“Providing a clean, safe, well-lit work environment is typically really high on the list of employers if they want to retain and attract the best talent,” said Jon R. Owens, a senior vice president with the commercial real estate firm Cassidy Turley who is not involved in the negotiations. “The Faris campus would be a significant upgrade in facilities. The bottom line is, how much is it worth to them?”

Rolls-Royce has touted the potential move as a way to reduce operating costs by bringing employees from its various facilities into one location.

Michael Huber Huber

Factoring into the cost equation are negotiations with Lilly over the site. Neither Rolls-Royce nor Lilly officials would comment on the discussions, but city officials said the deal most likely would be structured as a lease as opposed to a sale.

Rolls-Royce would lease the space directly from Lilly, which purchased the campus from Kite before the company went public in 2004. Tom McGowan, Kite’s CEO, declined to disclose the sale price.

A lease could bring challenges a sale would not, Owens said. For example, changes to accounting rules proposed by U.S. and international standard-setters would require companies to account for leases as liabilities on their balance sheets within the next few years.

In Rolls-Royce’s case, that would mean a lease of the Faris campus would translate into millions of dollars in liabilities on financial statements—something the company might consider undesirable.

Details to negotiate

What Rolls-Royce would pay to rent the space is unclear. Annual rent for Class A office space downtown typically ranges from $19.50 to $26 per square foot. CB Richard Ellis’ listing for the property calls rent terms “negotiable.”

Jeff Luebker, CB Richard Ellis’ broker on the deal, could not be reached.

Owens said the fact that Rolls-Royce likely would use all the campus makes it a more attractive tenant because it’s costly to subdivide space.

Also factoring into the picture are economic development incentives.

Michael Huber, Indianapolis’ deputy mayor for economic development, said the city is discussing incentives with Rolls-Royce but would not elaborate on specifics.

He said drawing Rolls-Royce downtown would be a boon to the area, and would help solidify the company’s long-term presence in the city.

The relocation also would give a boost to the sluggish downtown office market, which has a vacancy rate topping 20 percent.

Owens said he would expect to see the city offer incentives for a relocation of such magnitude.

“If they’re really contemplating 2,500 jobs in that location, it will have an immediate impact on the vicinity,” Owens said. “You’ll see business services and housing projects fill in spaces.”

But awarding incentives, at least certain types, would require City-County Council approval.

And some councilors say they would vigorously scrutinize this type of deal.

rolls“We can’t think by accommodating the desires of the business, that’s always going to be beneficial to the community,” said Brian Mahern, a council Democrat. “We have to expect—and people have to be prepared to present their arguments—that the deal is necessary.”

Incentives could help soften the impact of one-time expenses to retrofit the space for the needs of Rolls-Royce workers, as well as blunt the impact of downtown’s higher property taxes.

Parking will add to the cost.

Huber said there would be many ways to supplement the parking available in the Faris garage, but the city does not have specific solutions at this point.

Owens said potential options include parking near the main U.S. Post Office and Lucas Oil Stadium.

Central location

One prominent downtown office tenant said the benefits of being downtown outweigh the disadvantages of having to wrestle with such complications.

Todd Richardson, ExactTarget’s senior vice president of real estate, said the central location is convenient for his company’s employees, who are spread across Marion County and surrounding suburbs.

The e-mail marketing company houses workers in three downtown buildings, including its headquarters in the Guaranty Building on Monument Circle.

“Our employees appreciate the vibrancy of the downtown fabric,” Richardson said. “Specifically around the arts, the sporting events—just the general energy.”

City leaders hope the North of South project will add to the draw in the area near the Faris campus.

But it’s not clear whether the proposal for apartments, a YMCA and an upscale hotel north of South Street between Delaware Street and Virginia Avenue will pass council muster.

Council President Ryan Vaughn, a Republican, said he expects a close vote. The project has raised eyebrows because of the risk the city would assume in the deal, which calls for $9 million in tax-increment financing dollars for infrastructure improvements and the city’s guaranteeing an $86 million loan.

A council committee reviewed the project Jan. 12 and is expected to vote on it later this month.•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. It is nice and all that the developer grew up here and lives here, but do you think a company that builds and rehabs cottage-style homes has the chops to develop $150 Million of office, retail, and residential? I'm guessing they will quickly be over their skis and begging the city for even more help... This project should occur organically and be developed by those that can handle the size and scope of something like this as several other posters have mentioned.

  2. It amazes me how people with apparently zero knowledge of free markets or capitalism feel the need to read and post on a business journal website. Perhaps the Daily Worker would suit your interests better. It's definitely more sympathetic to your pro government theft views. It's too bad the Star is so awful as I'm sure you would find a much better home there.

  3. In other cities, expensive new construction projects are announced by real estate developers. In Carmel, they are announced by the local mayor. I am so, so glad I don't live in Carmel's taxbase--did you see that Carmel, a small Midwest suburb, has $500 million in debt?? That's unreal! The mayor thinks he's playing with Lego sets and Monopoly money here! Let these projects develop organically without government/taxpayer backing! Also, from a design standpoint, the whole town of Carmel looks comical. Grand, French-style buildings and promenades, sitting next to tire yards. Who do you guys think you are? Just my POV as a recent transplant to Indy.

  4. GeorgeP, you mention "necessities". Where in the announcement did it say anything about basic essentials like groceries? None of the plans and "vision" have basic essentials listed and nothing has been built. Traffic WILL be a nightmare. There is no east/west road capacity. GeorgeP, you also post on www.carmelchatter.com and your posts have repeatedly been proven wrong. You seem to have a fair amount of inside knowledge. Do you work on the third floor of Carmel City Hal?

  5. I don't know about the commuter buses...but it's a huge joke to see these IndyGo buses with just one or two passengers. Absolutely a disgusting waste of TAXPAYER money. Get some cojones and stop funding them. These (all of them) council members work for you. FIRE THEM!