IBJNews

Parking rates could double under city plan

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Downtown and Broad Ripple parking rates would double by 2012 under a city proposal to privatize Indianapolis’ parking operations.

City leaders unveiled details of the plan for the first time at a meeting Tuesday evening, in which they said hourly rates could rise from 75 cents to as much as $1.50 in Broad Ripple and some busy downtown areas.

A long-term lease deal and the additional revenue generated by higher fees would help the city repair streets, sidewalks and alleys in those areas. In addition, the extra money would cover the costs needed to install meters that accept credit cards.

Parking meters already add more than $4 million per year to city coffers. Privatization could double or triple that amount—or generate a lump sum payment of at least $100 million through a long-term lease.

Besides higher meter rates, metered hours would extend to 9 p.m. in busier downtown areas and to 8 p.m. in quieter parts. In Broad Ripple, hours would stretch to 11 p.m.

Most metered parking in the city now runs until 6 p.m., with a two-hour limit.

One of the goals of the proposal is to spur turnover at the most valuable parking spots in downtown and Broad Ripple, which would boost economic development and potentially generate more customers for businesses.

“We’ve created a situation where a lot of people who should be in medium- or long-term parking are in meters for hours at a time,” said Michael Huber, deputy mayor for economic development.

The hourly meter rate of 75 cents has not increased since 1975.

New rates would not take effect until later this year or early next year, depending on when the City-County Council approves a manager, Huber said. City leaders expect to make a recommendation within the next week, which the council could consider at its next meeting Aug. 23.

The city’s formal request for qualifications, issued in February, asked for proposals to oversee all 3,600 metered parking spaces, two city parking garages, two state-owned parking garages and one surface lot, three downtown garages now managed by Indianapolis-based Simon Property Group, planned surface and garage parking at the new Wishard Memorial Hospital, and three surface lots and one garage now operated by Marion County’s Capital Improvement Board.

Under the hybrid parking management system, locally based Denison Parking handles meter enforcement while city employees are responsible for meter maintenance and coin collection.  

Indianapolis received 16 responses to its privatization plan and narrowed the number down to seven. Denison, in a proposal with three affiliated partners, is among the finalists.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • What's next selling the airport?
    Only people happy about this is the politically connected winner of this long term contract and a few parking garage owners.
  • Stupid Idea
    I will stay in Carmel instead of hassling with downtown parking.

    Amazing how one Mayor can reverse a decade of progress by Indianapolis Downtown to attract people from the burbs to work and play.

    20 years ago, they identified parking as the #1 problem, And now they throw it all out by pushing free street parking out til 8:00 and doubling rates.

    Why would anyone want to stay after work or bring their family downtown now?
  • $$$
    So what happens to the businesses when people stop coming downtown and to Broad Ripple because of this parking issue? it will look like the old Meadows or Eastgate malls...barren and empty. it only take one small thing like this to make a large ripple effect. i recall reading that this was done in Chicago and the people hate it and the price to park there is a crazy price. maybe this is a plan to make people have to use public transportation.
  • $$$
    Peabody, well said. The city would not need to raise rates or extend hours on these meters if 50% of them weren't bagged over or signed for no parking all the time. It is another example of government forcing people out of the areas that they should be begging them to come to and spend money.
  • $$$
    so to pay for the money that the investor will give the city to run these units the investor will raise the fees to recoup that and the dollars spent on updating meters for credit cards. The money comes from tax payers so technically this is a tax. so to get around saying they haven't raised taxes they privatize it and the increase of fees is not a tax even though that is what happened.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT