Peapod sees Indianapolis as big growth market

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Peapod Inc. has discovered fertile ground in Indianapolis despite a crowded field of grocery competitors, said Scott DeGraeve, senior vice president at the country’s oldest and biggest online grocery-delivery service.

That is why the Chicago-based company wants to open a 50,000-square-foot local distribution center that could employ up to 238 employees over the next four years and make central Indiana one of the company’s bigger markets.

Peapod, which operates in 24 markets in the Midwest and eastern United States, began offering its service in Indianapolis in late 2010 and has done "really well," DeGraeve said, with sales doubling each year since it arrived.

The company averages about 1,300 orders per week locally. Each order costs a minimum of $60 and averages about $150, the company said, bringing area sales to above $10 million annually.

“We’re excited about how things have grown there,” said DeGraeve, who is based in Chicago and manages supply chain development for the company. “People there have really taken to the need for the service.”

Peapod’s plan is to spend about $6.5 million to lease and equip one-quarter of an existing 200,000-square warehouse at 9222 E. 33rd St. Nearly $5 million of that investment will go toward refrigeration, racking, technology and logistics equipment.

The company’s warehouse requirements are typically more stringent than those of average distribution users. The centers require multiple temperature zones for food storage. And the company carries more than 12,000 products, so state-of-the-art order-fulfillment equipment and technology is essential.

About 25 percent of the new employees will be drivers. The rest of the jobs will be in warehousing, order-fulfillment, technology, food-buying and management. Average wages for the new jobs will be $15 per hour.

The expansion is a big jump for Peapod, which right now operates with 15 local employees—all drivers who pick up orders at an area cross-dock facility from trucks arriving from Lake Zurich, Ill.

Peapod, founded in 1989, fills most orders on a next-day basis and charges from $6.95 to $9.95 per delivery. All orders are placed online. As of last year, more than a third of the company’s more than $550 million in overall sales came from orders placed by smartphone.

DeGraeve said a dedicated center should allow the company to keep doubling sales annually in Indianapolis over the next half-decade.

“We’ve done such strong business there that it makes more sense to have a local distribution center,” he said. “This is a very important step. We wanted to be confident that the growth is there, and it has been.”

The plan hinges on the company’s ability to land tax breaks from the city and state.

The company is asking the Metropolitan Development Commission for a seven-year tax abatement that will save the company an estimated $313,587, or 62 percent, on personal property taxes over the abatement period.

MDC staff said the company will pay about $191,384 in personal property taxes over that period and an estimated $58,266 annually after the abatement ends.

Peapod’s preliminary abatement request is scheduled to be heard at Wednesday afternoon’s MDC meeting. If approved, the final resolution would be voted on by the MDC on June 18.

The company is discussing a separate incentive deal with the state.

“This is a big investment and we really need these to make it economically viable,” DeGraeve said of the incentives.

Peapod will be trying to grow in one of the nation’s most competitive grocery markets. The city is home to Kroger, Marsh, SuperTarget, Wal-Mart, Meijer, Aldi, Whole Foods, Fresh Market and Earth Fare. In addition, Giant Eagle and Fresh Thyme have plans to enter the market.

“Competition is everywhere, in every market, and we all compete for overall food dollars,” DeGraeve said. “But we’re different. We offer affordable convenience, and we offer great value in the service we’re providing.”

The company expects to see growing competition in the online grocery delivery industry as more big players enter the market. In Indianapolis, however, Peapod and homegrown company Green BEAN Delivery are the biggest players.

Green BEAN, founded in 2007, has more than 200 employees and 10,000 member customers in Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky and Missouri.

DeGraeve said he doesn’t consider Green BEAN a direct competitor because it’s not a “full-line grocery delivery” service, and it operates in a different niche.

Unlike Peapod, Green BEAN uses a membership model and concentrates on organic produce and all-natural products.

“We’re going down two different paths,” said Matt Ewer, Green BEAN’s co-founder and president.

Ewer said he isn’t greatly concerned about Peapod’s expansion plan because the company has been in Indianapolis for three years and hasn’t prevented his company from experiencing rapid growth.

“This is really a continuation and a progression,” he said. “It’s not surprising. Everybody is trying to grow.”

Ewer said he expects to see even more competition in the local online delivery market, a trend that might actually boost business as consumers get more comfortable shopping for groceries online.


  • Too Lazy?
    YOu think it is because people are too lazy? We use it because we have two small children and my wife is a nurse who does not always get home at a consistent time. It has nothing to do with being lazy. It is convenient, saves time, and allows us more family time during the week after work instead of having to run errands.
  • You are so right
    Established brick and mortar stores are here, and pay taxes. Why should a new entry receive tax breaks just because they are new? Their customers don't need the price break if they are too lazy to go to the store, let them pay the higher rate. Most of the jobs are for drivers, who will use the taxpayer paid roads and other services. Time to end the tax breaks. Fair tax, same for everybody, levels the playing field for business.
  • Tax abatements benefit consumers
    The notion that tax abatements benefit only the corporation ("padding their profits") shows a real lack of understanding about the reality of corporate taxpaying. Ultimately, corporations don't pay taxes any more than they pay utilities bills or salaries - all these costs are passed along to customers. The lower any of these costs are, the lower prices consumers pay for the product or service being sold. In this instance, a tax abatement for Pea Pod means lowers prices for the company's customers. And that's a good thing.
  • Peapod and Green...
    I use each and and love the quality and service I receive from both. But... If these companies see Indianapolis as such a "big growth market" then they don't need personal property tax abatements as an incentive to expand here. They are using our roads that are paid for with our taxes, employing our citizens, who are educated using our property tax dollars. If they are expanding because they see the potential, they are going to do that anyway. These companies don't need tax abatements to pad their profits at the expense of our citizens. Corporations should pay their fair share.
    • Innovation
      Makes me wonder why Kroger, Marsh and friends aren't jumping into grocery delivery. They have everything (plus customer loyalty) except for the drivers. Not much innovation in the grocery as service industry in a long time. It's ripe for disruption and the big boys might get left behind.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

    2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

    3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

    4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

    5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.