IBJNews

Pedcor to start second phase of Carmel's City Center

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Buoyed by strong demand for apartments in Carmel, Pedcor Cos. expects to break ground next spring on the first building in phase two of its massive City Center project.

The Nash, a three-story, $10 million mixed-use building, is to be built just south of City Center on the west side of Rangeline Road. It will contain 31 one-, two- and three-bedroom apartments on the second and third floors and 8,000 square feet of commercial space at street level. The city of Carmel will contribute $2 million of the total for infrastructure and 42 underground parking spaces.

A residential building proposed for a site immediately west of The Nash is still on the drawing board, as are two commercial buildings in phase two that would be built immediately north of the Nash site, said Melissa Averitt, director of marketing and sales for Pedcor.

The first phase of City Center included 106 apartments and 62,000 square feet of retail/commercial space. Averitt said about 6,500 square feet of retail/commercial space remains. And the apartments, which began coming on line in August 2010, are about 90 percent leased. They range in size from 800 to 3,000 square feet and rent for about $1.15 a square foot.

The Nash units will be roughly 800 to 1,400 square feet, with rents projected at $1.25 to $1.30 a square foot by the time they open two years from now.

The apartment market is red hot, and Carmel is no exception, said George Tikijian of apartment brokerage firm Tikijian Associates.

Tikijian said a pair of projects illustrate the demand. One One Six Apartments, a 191-unit development by J.C. Hart Co. at 116th Street and College Avenue, was fully leased six months after it opened in April. Sophia Square, a 202-unit Keystone Group project in the Carmel Arts & Design District, was 94-percent leased within nine months of its opening in May 2011.

Another project, the 193-unit Penn Circle at Old Meridian Street and Carmel Drive, started leasing in September and is seeing strong demand, Tikijian said. That project, developed by Milhaus Development, is leased and managed by Gene B. Glick Co.

Tikijian said the only cloud on the horizon for the apartment market in Hamilton County is the strengthening market for single-family homes. Apartment dwellers in places like Carmel and Fishers are more likely than their downtown Indianapolis counterparts to opt for home ownership, he said.

Pedcor is counting on continued strong demand from young professionals and empty nesters to fill The Nash apartments, Averitt said.

The building's 8,000 square feet of commercial space shouldn't be hard to fill, said Donna Hovey, a retail broker at CBRE. She said the space should easily command the $23 to $24 per square foot Pedcor plans to charge.

Hovey said the center of gravity for retail in Carmel has shifted from the Keystone Square area along Keystone Parkway to Rangeline, and small users the Nash is targeting will benefit from being along that busy stretch of road.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Join the discussion
    For further discussion on this project and other Carmel news, visit us at CarmelChatter.com. Here's a link to our current discussion on this specific project: http://carmelchatter.com/showthread.php?521-Nash-Building
  • Clarification
    I fellow poster on another forum provided a little more detail. The footprint of the building is actually 16,000, with the first floor being half commercial and half apartments. That provides 8000sf of retail and 40,000sf of apartments in total, making the math much less fuzzy.
  • Cap Rate?
    How do you get $10MM? With no underwriting, 8000sf of retail at $24 and say 15,000 of apt at $1.30 get an NOI of $426,000. Using a 4.26% cap rate? Fuzzy math at best.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

    2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

    3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

    4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

    5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

    ADVERTISEMENT