IBJNews

Pedcor to start second phase of Carmel's City Center

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Buoyed by strong demand for apartments in Carmel, Pedcor Cos. expects to break ground next spring on the first building in phase two of its massive City Center project.

The Nash, a three-story, $10 million mixed-use building, is to be built just south of City Center on the west side of Rangeline Road. It will contain 31 one-, two- and three-bedroom apartments on the second and third floors and 8,000 square feet of commercial space at street level. The city of Carmel will contribute $2 million of the total for infrastructure and 42 underground parking spaces.

A residential building proposed for a site immediately west of The Nash is still on the drawing board, as are two commercial buildings in phase two that would be built immediately north of the Nash site, said Melissa Averitt, director of marketing and sales for Pedcor.

The first phase of City Center included 106 apartments and 62,000 square feet of retail/commercial space. Averitt said about 6,500 square feet of retail/commercial space remains. And the apartments, which began coming on line in August 2010, are about 90 percent leased. They range in size from 800 to 3,000 square feet and rent for about $1.15 a square foot.

The Nash units will be roughly 800 to 1,400 square feet, with rents projected at $1.25 to $1.30 a square foot by the time they open two years from now.

The apartment market is red hot, and Carmel is no exception, said George Tikijian of apartment brokerage firm Tikijian Associates.

Tikijian said a pair of projects illustrate the demand. One One Six Apartments, a 191-unit development by J.C. Hart Co. at 116th Street and College Avenue, was fully leased six months after it opened in April. Sophia Square, a 202-unit Keystone Group project in the Carmel Arts & Design District, was 94-percent leased within nine months of its opening in May 2011.

Another project, the 193-unit Penn Circle at Old Meridian Street and Carmel Drive, started leasing in September and is seeing strong demand, Tikijian said. That project, developed by Milhaus Development, is leased and managed by Gene B. Glick Co.

Tikijian said the only cloud on the horizon for the apartment market in Hamilton County is the strengthening market for single-family homes. Apartment dwellers in places like Carmel and Fishers are more likely than their downtown Indianapolis counterparts to opt for home ownership, he said.

Pedcor is counting on continued strong demand from young professionals and empty nesters to fill The Nash apartments, Averitt said.

The building's 8,000 square feet of commercial space shouldn't be hard to fill, said Donna Hovey, a retail broker at CBRE. She said the space should easily command the $23 to $24 per square foot Pedcor plans to charge.

Hovey said the center of gravity for retail in Carmel has shifted from the Keystone Square area along Keystone Parkway to Rangeline, and small users the Nash is targeting will benefit from being along that busy stretch of road.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Join the discussion
    For further discussion on this project and other Carmel news, visit us at CarmelChatter.com. Here's a link to our current discussion on this specific project: http://carmelchatter.com/showthread.php?521-Nash-Building
  • Clarification
    I fellow poster on another forum provided a little more detail. The footprint of the building is actually 16,000, with the first floor being half commercial and half apartments. That provides 8000sf of retail and 40,000sf of apartments in total, making the math much less fuzzy.
  • Cap Rate?
    How do you get $10MM? With no underwriting, 8000sf of retail at $24 and say 15,000 of apt at $1.30 get an NOI of $426,000. Using a 4.26% cap rate? Fuzzy math at best.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

    2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

    3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

    4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

    5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

    ADVERTISEMENT