IBJNews

Presidential hopefuls Daniels, Pence reflect two sides of GOP

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

New York has nothing on Indiana when it comes to the very early 2012 presidential sweepstakes.

The Empire State has its two aspirants—former Gov. George Pataki and famous rich guy Donald Trump—but so does the Hoosier state: Gov. Mitch Daniels and U.S. Rep. Mike Pence, both of whom have made it to the national pundits’ coveted “being mentioned” list of Republican candidates for president.

It is not so unusual for a state to have more than one prospective candidate two years before the election. Only once—after Robert F. Kennedy was assassinated, leaving Minnesotans Hubert Humphrey and Eugene McCarthy to battle out the 1968 Democratic nomination—did it go down to the wire, said Ray Scheele, co-director of the Bowen Center for Public Affairs at Ball State University.
 
What may be more remarkable about the possibility of these two Hoosiers becoming presidential candidates is that, through them, Indiana represents something of a microcosm of the national Republican Party and its philosophical wings.

“The contrast between Mike Pence and Mitch Daniels is substantial,” said Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia Center for Politics. “Daniels is conservative on social issues, but that is not his focus. His focus is fiscal issues. Pence is a fiscal conservative, but he is much more identified with social issues. So they do represent two vital wings of the GOP.”

Daniels, who has said Republicans should call a truce on social issues so the country can focus on fiscal ones, insists he has not decided to run. Instead, he is merely keeping the door cracked open in case his services are needed—that is, if no other worthy challenger to President Barack Obama’s expected re-election bid rises to the occasion. But several experts say his actions speak louder than words.

“I myself certainly do not believe [Daniels] when he suggests that he is leaning toward not running, unless his reading is that he really doesn’t have a chance to win,” said Bruce Stinebrickner, a political science professor at DePauw University. “I think the chances that he will run are very strong, perhaps 80 [percent] to 90 percent.”

David Hadley, political science chairman at Wabash College, found it “a little disingenuous” when Daniels said he invited Republican bigwigs and money men for group discussions on issues so he did not have to meet separately with all those clambering to see him.

“I think more than that was happening,” Hadley said. “It was a bunch of people who could throw in a couple million dollars here and there.”

Pence likewise has not been so gauche as to flat out announce a candidacy, but he traveled Oct. 2 to Iowa—site of the first primary-season caucuses—and got national attention in September when he came in first among prospective Republican candidates in a straw vote at the Values Voter Summit.

He also is airing a television ad—which has made its way to national exposure on YouTube—that may leave the uninitiated confused as to which office he seeks. Though he is running against Democrat Barry Welsh for a sixth House term, only in the last of 60 seconds is the word “congressman” on screen. Before that, Pence speaks about leadership and intones: “This is the moment. Now is the time. I know we will reclaim our liberty because every time freedom gets an up or down vote in the heartland of America, freedom always wins.”

The ad, Hadley said, “could do triple duty for him. He doesn’t have to worry about winning the congressional election, but this is getting his name out there, reminding people that he’s running. It could be aimed at a presidential audience. It also could be, with all those cornfields, an Indiana audience for the governor’s race.”

Several experts concur that both Daniels and Pence may be viable candidates. “What distinguishes Mitch Daniels and Mike Pence from their counterparts on the ‘wings’ of the party is how calm and collected and credible they both usually are,” DePauw’s Stinebrickner said.

Observers also agreed that—as IUPUI associate professor Ramla Bandele put it—though “people think he will not be taken seriously because he is so small in stature … Daniels is taken more seriously” for a variety of reasons.

First, he has experience in both the executive and legislative branches, as well as in government and politics. In addition to his own electoral victories and service in the governor’s office, Daniels held high-ranking positions in the Reagan and George W. Bush administrations. And as a top Senate aide to U.S. Sen. Richard Lugar, he ran the Republican senatorial campaign committee when Lugar headed it.

Second, the experts noted, only one sitting member of the House of Representatives—James Garfield—has ever been elected president. Rising from governor to president is much more common.

Third, the field of social conservatives, with which Pence is most associated, is likely to be large if Obama appears vulnerable, Scheele said. Daniels, known for his business sensibilities and fiscal conservatism, is unlikely to have as much competition for the hearts of voters to whom such attributes are appealing.

That means the vote in early primaries may be more split on the Pence side of the spectrum, less so on the Daniels side. Even more important, said Hadley, is that dollars may be scarcer for Pence than for Daniels.

“My sense is Mitch Daniels has access to large contributors—the Bush Texas connection, the people who came up with big bucks to support Bush when he first ran and businessmen with that fiscal conservativism,” Hadley said. “Mike Pence has access to the Christian Right, family-values people, who are not necessarily going to be large contributors but there are going to be lots of them.”

While Stinebrickner said “it’s not inconceivable” that “the final choice [for the Republican nominee] would be between the two Hoosiers,” the other experts interviewed for this story thought that unlikely. Indeed, although noting that “both are credible enough so that they will be considered seriously if they run,” Sabato said “the suspicion is that both will choose not to pull the trigger in the end and will end up running for something else or not running at all.”

State law prohibits Daniels from running for a third consecutive term as governor. Pence, the third-ranking Republican in the House, would be more prominent if Republicans win the House majority in November and is thought by some to be in line to someday be speaker.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Obama
    George Bush is the most hated president in recent history? Go over to Rasmussen and take a strong wiff of reality!
  • Hopefuls?
    Since when did Pence and Daniels become "hopefuls"? Have they declared their candidacies?
  • America Speaking Out
    I was initial excited to see Mike Pence run. My mind has changed since I saw him with http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Mike+Pence/John+Boehner/House+Republican+Leaders+Hold+Media+Availability/b4-zGWq2ciB John Boehner (R-OH). Pence is just a typical Republican and there is absolutely nothing new. Mitch might be a good candidate but I agree the connection with Bush is tough.
  • MITCH = BUSH
    Unfortunately, regardless of how much money Mitch can raise, he is forever connected to George Bush. He may end up as a VEEP, but never a President because of that stigma (most hated president in recent history).
    • yuk
      Pence--YUK!
    • what?
      Wow, behold the identity politics/propaganda? Why not ask Obama the same? These politicians are not there to solve all the world's problems. I bet DCS has mos tof the services and $ they need but waste it on incompetent workers and fat, lazy 65k/year folks that won't retire for the betterment of the children and state. I know. I've worked with them before. DCS workers are about as competent as IPS bureaucrats. Fed/state agencies could get twice as much done with half the staff. Cut the fat. Mitch should do that. And I say this as a proud state worker but also an honest one.
    • What do you expect, Doug?
      This is a comment from a professor (and a nation) that voted for Barack Obama due to his skin color and "style" over his substance, record or achievement -- all of which lacked. A white candidate with a white version of Rev. Wright is out of the race in March 2008. Obama just moved on to victory. Sad but true.
      I'm sure Gov. Christie will be disqualified as presidential candidate due to his rotund figure. This is 2010, not 1910, sadly. And we're all worse off for ths shallowness of Profs and Obama supporters.
    • Presidential Hopefuls Daniels and Pence
      IUPUI associate professor Bandele's comments in your newspaper article, regarding the height of the Governor, were shocking. They were demeaning and offensive.

      Observers also agreed thatâ??as IUPUI associate professor Ramla Bandele put itâ??though â??people think he will not be taken seriously because he is so small in stature â?¦ Daniels is taken more seriouslyâ??
      • These comments are insane
        Decent article, but the commenters should go to ANY neighboring midwest state to see what BAD governors (Democrats) can do to ruin an economy. Only Indiana has survived the recession in this region -- thanks to Daniels. The rich, greedy, ungrateful latte leftists bashing him are very disingenuous and, frankly, shameful.
      • Two sides of personal and Corprate Greed
        I think they are alike. Both will sell their mothers to the highest bidder if it means something in their personal pockets. Mitch would sell off the National Parks telling Americans we can't afford them. He is on his way to China to muster up some foreign potential buyers I suppose. Mike is much the same, but he would be more like the puritians who murdered anyone who did not follow church lines, calling them witches and heretics.
      • how can mitch be trusted?
        How can the nation trust Mitch to protect its children when he cannot protect the children of Indiana? The Ind Dept of Child protective Services is a mess. Indiana children are dying at an alarming rate from neglect. As said in the text of the article, social issues are not his focus. That is the truth.. just ask the dead children's families.
        • Not much of a choice
          As ex-wrestler/governor, Jesse Ventura says, "..there's only one party in the US - the money party. There's the Democrat wing and the Republican wing"; and, the tea party is simply another room in the Republican wing.

          Both wings had perfect opportunities majorities in the house and senate, plus the white house; and, both wings of the same money party sold out to lawyers, bankers and every other check-writing special interests.
        • How Tim Durham will haunt Mitch Daniels
          If Mitch Daniels wants to even have a prayer of a chance at becoming the first short President since I can remember he needs to cut a check to the Fair Finance trustee for the hundreds of thousands in stolen money he received from Tim Durham.

          Hey Mitch, remember those late night meetings behind closed doors with Tim at his Geist mansion--the one that was just foreclosed on it?

          Post a comment to this story

          COMMENTS POLICY
          We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
           
          You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
           
          Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
           
          No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
           
          We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
           

          Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

          Sponsored by
          ADVERTISEMENT

          facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

          Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
          Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
           
          Subscribe to IBJ
          1. liek the rest of America

          2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

          3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

          4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

          5. whoa!

          ADVERTISEMENT