IBJNews

UPDATE: Primary care at heart of hospitals' deal

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Community Health Network’s new partnership with Wishard Health Services will create a primary-care behemoth that the systems argue will put them in the best position possible to handle the changes coming from federal health reform.

The two Indianapolis-based hospital systems announced Monday morning that they have formed a joint operating partnership, which will coordinate the operations of their hospitals and health care facilities.

The two systems combined will have 29 health centers providing primary care and 28 locations providing behavioral health care.

“We are by far the largest organization in those two areas,” said Community Health CEO Bryan Mills, who also will lead the joint-operating entity.

The combined entity will be governed by a seven-member board, with four members coming from Community and three from Wishard.

Wishard,  the county-owned health system, will change its name to Eskenazi Health in 2014. Wishard is building a downtown hospital that will be the premier trauma center in Indiana as well as handle a large portion of Marion County’s indigent patients. The hospital is set to open in December.

The deal got started in late August when the leaders of Wishard—Lisa Harris and Matt Gutwein—visited Mills at his office on the northeast side of Indianapolis.

Gutwein, who is CEO of the Wishard-parent Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County, said he and Harris realized their organization needed more “scope and scale” to handle the expected influx of patients coming from President Obama’s 2010 health reform bill.

That law raises various taxes to expand state Medicaid programs and provide subsidies for low- to middle-income Americans to buy private insurance. Combined, those efforts are expected to bring 27 million additional Americans into the health care system.

In Indiana, it is not certain that state leaders will expand the Medicaid system, which could dampen the number of newly covered patients. But patients with insurance coverage tend to use, on average, twice as much medical care as those who are uninsured.

“Our expectation from expanded coverage is more demand for services,” Gutwein said. “We expect that, which is one of the reasons why we’re doing this.”

Gutwein and Mills also said they were amazed at how little overlap the two hospital systems have in terms of geography and service lines. Mills said he had been considering if Community should get into the trauma business, but now it doesn’t need to, since Wishard has such a strong trauma program.

Their combined primary-care assets could help the organizations in two ways. First, health care reform is creating new ways of paying hospitals that will reward them for keeping patients healthy and out of the hospital.

Also, primary care physicians are often the first point of contact for patients who need specialized care. Their referrals are coveted by hospitals with large numbers of operating rooms and beds to keep filled.

The two systems will jointly operate Wishard's hospital and health centers, as well as Community’s hospitals, Community's physician network, its behavioral health services and many ambulatory sites of care.

Community is a not-for-profit system of seven hospitals, five of them in Marion County, and roughly 200 other surgery centers, imaging centers, physician offices and walk-in clinics. Community has more than 11,000 employees and annual revenue of $1.3 billion.

Wishard has more than 4,000 employees and more than $500 million in revenue.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Really?
    They can do all of the maneuvering they want, but you cannot put enough lip stick on that pig called the community health network. They can give you all of the corporate reasons why they are doing this deal...the only reason is that their internals told them they have big image a service problems at Community
  • Wine
    Here are a few more details.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT