IBJNews

Receiver to manage assets of Fishers money manager

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A receiver will take control of assets held by a prominent Fishers money manager accused by state officials of violating securities laws.

Samex Capital CEO Keenan R. Hauke and Indiana Securities Commissioner Chris Naylor agreed to the appointment of a receiver and for a preliminary injunction barring Hauke and Samex from transferring cash or assets, destroying documents or conducting business on behalf of Samex customers.

Both orders were entered June 17 in Hamilton County Superior Court.

The state’s complaint says Hauke intentionally received funds from the bank accounts of Samex Capital Partners that were illegally converted from investors in a hedge fund. The state securities division says Hauke violated the Indiana Uniform Securities Act by failing to inform customers that the funds they were investing would be converted to his personal use.

The receiver, William E. Wendling of Carmel-based Campbell Kyle Proffitt LLP, will be responsible for establishing a claims process to distribute funds to "aggrieved shareholders and partners" and distribute assets. It was not clear how much shareholders are owed or how much the Samex and Hauke assets are worth. No charges have been filed.

Samex Capital Partners operates the hedge fund under investigation. Hauke recently sold Samex Capital Advisors, his financial-advising arm, to Global Investment Solutions LLC in Ontario, Canada. But he has said in court filings that no money changed hands and that the agreement calls for him to receive a percentage of commissions only if clients choose to move their account to Global.

The receiver would not have authority over assets transfered to Global, but any commissions earned by Hauke would go into a restitution fund for investors.

The agreement allows Hauke to use about $9,500 in a personal bank account to pay his $2,100 home mortgage and $350 monthly car payment, allowing for the preservation of his assets "pending trial." The injunction allows Hauke to keep earnings from any entity not named in the case that he collects after April 15, 2011.

The Indiana Secretary of State revoked Hauke's financial-advising license in May, a few weeks after a Hamilton County judge ordered a freeze on the money manager's assets and a temporary restraining order barring him from conducting business.

Hauke had written a regular investing column for IBJ for nine years until the column was suspended indefinitely in mid-April after the investigation came to light.

The investigation stems from former Samex adviser Scott Noble’s decision to notify the state about irregularities he said he discovered at the firm. In an interview with IBJ, Noble declined to divulge what the irregularities might include, but said he believed them to be so serious that he resigned from Samex.

Hauke’s lawyer, Larry Mackey of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, said in an e-mail late in April that the complaint was filed by a “former and disgruntled” employee who had previously never raised any concerns about Hauke.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Heist Reservoir
    Another guy living in Geist who was stealing and living it up? NO WAY! When will people ever learn? If your money manager lives in Geist, pull your money and take it elsewhere. He was probably trying to keep up with the jones's AKA Durham, Shrenker, etc. who were out rubbing their materialistic ways in everyone's faces. So I guess you can call it keeping up with the phony Jones's. Geist = Land of the phonies.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT