IBJNews

Receiver to manage assets of Fishers money manager

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A receiver will take control of assets held by a prominent Fishers money manager accused by state officials of violating securities laws.

Samex Capital CEO Keenan R. Hauke and Indiana Securities Commissioner Chris Naylor agreed to the appointment of a receiver and for a preliminary injunction barring Hauke and Samex from transferring cash or assets, destroying documents or conducting business on behalf of Samex customers.

Both orders were entered June 17 in Hamilton County Superior Court.

The state’s complaint says Hauke intentionally received funds from the bank accounts of Samex Capital Partners that were illegally converted from investors in a hedge fund. The state securities division says Hauke violated the Indiana Uniform Securities Act by failing to inform customers that the funds they were investing would be converted to his personal use.

The receiver, William E. Wendling of Carmel-based Campbell Kyle Proffitt LLP, will be responsible for establishing a claims process to distribute funds to "aggrieved shareholders and partners" and distribute assets. It was not clear how much shareholders are owed or how much the Samex and Hauke assets are worth. No charges have been filed.

Samex Capital Partners operates the hedge fund under investigation. Hauke recently sold Samex Capital Advisors, his financial-advising arm, to Global Investment Solutions LLC in Ontario, Canada. But he has said in court filings that no money changed hands and that the agreement calls for him to receive a percentage of commissions only if clients choose to move their account to Global.

The receiver would not have authority over assets transfered to Global, but any commissions earned by Hauke would go into a restitution fund for investors.

The agreement allows Hauke to use about $9,500 in a personal bank account to pay his $2,100 home mortgage and $350 monthly car payment, allowing for the preservation of his assets "pending trial." The injunction allows Hauke to keep earnings from any entity not named in the case that he collects after April 15, 2011.

The Indiana Secretary of State revoked Hauke's financial-advising license in May, a few weeks after a Hamilton County judge ordered a freeze on the money manager's assets and a temporary restraining order barring him from conducting business.

Hauke had written a regular investing column for IBJ for nine years until the column was suspended indefinitely in mid-April after the investigation came to light.

The investigation stems from former Samex adviser Scott Noble’s decision to notify the state about irregularities he said he discovered at the firm. In an interview with IBJ, Noble declined to divulge what the irregularities might include, but said he believed them to be so serious that he resigned from Samex.

Hauke’s lawyer, Larry Mackey of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, said in an e-mail late in April that the complaint was filed by a “former and disgruntled” employee who had previously never raised any concerns about Hauke.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Heist Reservoir
    Another guy living in Geist who was stealing and living it up? NO WAY! When will people ever learn? If your money manager lives in Geist, pull your money and take it elsewhere. He was probably trying to keep up with the jones's AKA Durham, Shrenker, etc. who were out rubbing their materialistic ways in everyone's faces. So I guess you can call it keeping up with the phony Jones's. Geist = Land of the phonies.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I'm a CPA who works with a wide range of companies (through my firm K.B.Parrish & Co.); however, we work with quite a few car dealerships, so I'm fairly interested in Fatwin (mentioned in the article). Does anyone have much information on that, or a link to such information? Thanks.

  2. Historically high long-term unemployment, unprecedented labor market slack and the loss of human capital should not be accepted as "the economy at work [and] what is supposed to happen" and is certainly not raising wages in Indiana. See Chicago Fed Reserve: goo.gl/IJ4JhQ Also, here's our research on Work Sharing and our support testimony at yesterday's hearing: goo.gl/NhC9W4

  3. I am always curious why teachers don't believe in accountability. It's the only profession in the world that things they are better than everyone else. It's really a shame.

  4. It's not often in Indiana that people from both major political parties and from both labor and business groups come together to endorse a proposal. I really think this is going to help create a more flexible labor force, which is what businesses claim to need, while also reducing outright layoffs, and mitigating the impact of salary/wage reductions, both of which have been highlighted as important issues affecting Hoosier workers. Like many other public policies, I'm sure that this one will, over time, be tweaked and changed as needed to meet Indiana's needs. But when you have such broad agreement, why not give this a try?

  5. I could not agree more with Ben's statement. Every time I look at my unemployment insurance rate, "irritated" hardly describes my sentiment. We are talking about a surplus of funds, and possibly refunding that, why, so we can say we did it and get a notch in our political belt? This is real money, to real companies, large and small. The impact is felt across the board; in the spending of the company, the hiring (or lack thereof due to higher insurance costs), as well as in the personal spending of the owners of a smaller company.

ADVERTISEMENT