Report: IOSHA loses its teeth as workplace safety watchdog

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The state agency charged with keeping Indiana workplaces safe inspects fewer than a third of the businesses it did in the 1980s, issues fines for serious violations that average less than half the national rate and issued violations at a lower rate than the national average the past decade, according to a newspaper report.

The Journal Gazette of Fort Wayne reports that the Indiana Occupational Safety and Health Administration, created in the 1970s as an agency to be the state equivalent of the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration is a dramatically changed agency that has struggled with employee turnover and with getting bogged down recently in high-profile cases.

IOSHA conducts surprise inspections to make sure workplace safety laws are being enforced. IOSHA also responds to workplace complaints and follows up on fatalities and serious injuries at workplaces.

There was a distinct drop in IOSHA inspections in the early 1990s, going from about 6,700 a year in 1989 to about 2,940 five years later, according to computerized OSHA data through September 2011. Except for some noticeable dips, the number has hovered around the agency's goal of 2,000 since 1999, according to the analysis by the Journal Gazette.

New Labor Commissioner Sean M. Keefer has "strongly reaffirmed" the 2,000 inspection goal and that it would be achieved, said Robert Dittmer, state Department of Labor spokesman.

Officials say lower fines are a reflection that they'd rather see businesses change and problems fixed than always issue a penalty. They also point to a significant, yearslong decline in reported workplace deaths and injuries nationally and in Indiana.

"I would say we've impacted it," former Labor Commissioner Lori Torres said before being replaced when Gov. Mike Pence took office last month. The public is demanding a safer workplace and she said employers see a competitive benefit for workplaces being safer.

IOSHA also has seen the number of inspectors drop from about 100 in the 1980s to about 40 now. OSHA has said IOSHA should have 70 inspectors, but the state petitioned three years ago to reduce that number, calling it excessive. That request is still pending.

Last year, a federal audit of IOSHA found it had a "long history of funding difficulties" and found staffing to be a major, ongoing problem. An improved economy, the report noted, might even make the issue worse by luring staff away to higher-paying jobs.

IOSHA acknowledges staff turnover has been a problem, along with some highly publicized cases. For the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30, the agency said it had performed 1,205 inspections, far short of its goal. IOSHA said several staff members leaving in 2010 was partly to blame, along with a lengthy training period for new hires.

Two highly publicized cases also drew a lot of manpower: The death of 20-year-old University of Notre Dame student Declan Sullivan while filming football practice on Oct. 27, 2010, when winds of up to 53 mph blew over the lift he was on; and the August 2011 stage rigging collapse at the State Fair that killed seven people and injured nearly 60 others.

"Every time we do one of those, that's going to put our numbers down," Torres said of high-profile cases. "The State Fair took six months, and it was two compliance officers full time every day for six months and a handful of others during that period of time."

Mark Crouch, associate professor of labor studies at IPFW, said he doesn't think IOSHA is feared by Indiana industry.

"If you make the salaries for the agency low enough, no one in business has to worry about inspections at random when they don't have enough staff to answer the phones and deal with complaints," Crouch said.

Thomas Black, a safety consultant and owner of Safer Worker Systems in Fort Wayne, said he believes some employers, especially in the construction sector he deals with, are putting more emphasis on being in compliance. He also said he is not sure more inspectors or higher fines will push employers to do a better job of following the rules.

"I think that when you've got a group of people like that, I think maybe Indiana is saying, 'Hey, we know our market, we know our people, and we know that we don't need to be hammering people,' " he said.


  • IOSHA lax
    IOSHA does seem lax especially when it comes to state departments. State departmental trucks are not given any scrutiny in regards to state highway law enforcement and IOSHA follows suit in regards to state run undertakings. Just look at an average INDOT heavy vehicle and you will probably find a number of citations that would not be allowable for a commercial vehicle. IOSHA gives the same nod and wink to Indiana State run Government Departments.
  • Not Relevant
    Manufacturing left Indiana years ago and went overseas. There is no need for IOSHA or UNIONS.
  • Employee safety and environment were on Mitch's kill list
    I would say that Mitch worked to kill anything business didn't like. Wages, unemployment, school taxes, etc were targets of Mitch. We are all against undue regulations. But are we for business to run a muck without over site? Can business continue to ignore employment laws and avoid the regulations....and avoid hiring Americans? Per our last governor...yes anything for business. In the end....news spin masters are much smarter than voters.
  • In Other News...
    The sun rose this morning.
  • it is so
    An all too common occurrence all over the country. Those who loudly and vehemently complain about overregulation are now invited to kindly shut up.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ