IBJNews

Rush named first female Indiana Supreme Court chief justice

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Loretta Rush, a longtime juvenile court judge who joined the Indiana Supreme Court in 2012, was unanimously chosen as the state's first female chief justice Wednesday, setting the stage for what could be a long run at the court's helm.

The seven-member Judicial Nominating Commission chose Rush to succeed Justice Brent Dickson as the high court's leader. Dickson announced in June that he would step down as chief justice but remain an associate justice.

Dickson succeeded Randall Shepard as chief justice in 2012. He faces mandatory retirement when he turns 75 in 2016.

Gov. Mike Pence praised Rush's appointment in a statement late Wednesday afternoon, noting that the nominating commission "has made history and ensured that Indiana's Supreme Court will continue to have outstanding leadership in the years ahead."

Indiana justices are appointed to five-year terms before facing a retention vote.

Rush's appointment also drew praise from legal experts, who noted that though she is the court's newest member, she has proven herself by writing opinions in a series of contentious cases. Those include one involving the free speech rights of an Indiana blogger and another involving an Evansville smoking ban.

"She written unanimous opinions for the court in some of the most important and complicated cases," said Joel Schumm, a professor at Indiana University's Robert H. McKinney School of Law and an expert on Indiana's courts.

Rush, 56, thanked the panel for its support and said she was ready to work closely with the other four justices.

"I think we work well together, the five of us," she said. "We work on tough cases, there is a lot of administrative work we all have done. So I appreciate the vote of confidence."

During public interviews before her selection, Rush fielded questions about her judicial philosophy, her view of the role of chief justice and how she would balance her home life and the responsibilities of the job.

She likened her philosophy to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, because of his narrow reading of the Constitution and the founders' intentions, and said a chief justice must be a role model and build consensus.

After Rush talked about letting her 12-year-old son throw out the first pitch at a recent Gary Railcats game, commission member John Ulmer asked how she would juggle her work and home lives. Rush said it's important to be a good time manager and noted that she has adult children and is experienced at multitasking.

Ulmer said he didn't plan to ask Rush about work-family balance until Rush mentioned her son. That had him thinking about how his family coped when he was a state lawmaker, he said.

"My wife had to raise our children while I worked all day and night, sometimes five nights a week, and I saw how it affected my children," Ulmer said.

Ulmer said he did not ask the three male candidates that question because he knew they didn't have young children.

Rush worked in private practice in Lafayette before serving 14 years on the Tippecanoe Superior Court. She was appointed the state's 108th Supreme Court justice by former Gov. Mitch Daniels in 2012. She is the first woman to serve on the state Supreme Court since Myra Selby stepped down in 1999 after five years on the bench.

In Tippecanoe County, Rush led a push for better and more uniform protections for Indiana's abused and neglected children. She helped create the county's Court Appointed Special Advocate program, implemented a juvenile drug treatment court and initiated a 24-hour assessment center for youth.

As a Supreme Court Justice, Rush leads the Commission on Improving the Status of Children in Indiana and the Indiana Conference for Legal Education Opportunity. She also serves on several panels focused on juvenile justice.

Rush was born in Scranton, Pennsylvania, and moved to Indiana in 1976. After graduating from Purdue University in 1980, she washed dishes and did other jobs to work her way through the Indiana University School of Law.

In November 1998, before her first term as a Tippecanoe County judge began, a former juvenile client kicked in the front door of Rush's home and tried to kill her husband. Rush hid their children and tried to get help, but she and her husband both were injured and she later had to have surgery. The attacker was convicted of attempted murder and burglary.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Scalia???
    First...so glad to see a woman appointed to this role and great good luck to her...but Scalia as a philosophical role model is a bit concerning. Seriosuly? The man they call the "court of one"? You can't call extending "we the people" to corporations a narrow interpretation of the Constitution or the founder's intent...even more concerning is Scalia's insistence that women don't enjoy protection under the 14th amendment...they are indeed persons and citizens which are the two words used in the amendment, so apparently he needs to read the document he claims to understand so well...hopefully the Hon. Chief Justice is concerned with consensus building and being a role model as she says, and that she actually knows what is in the constitution if she is going to interpret it "Narrowly"...I'll take her at her word...perhaps she was so stunned at being tabbed the leader of the Men's Club she didn't have time to consider a more thoughtful quote. Godspeed Chief Justice Rush...
  • Strange Juxtaposition
    I also congratulate the justice on her historic appointment. I find it a strange juxtaposition to state an affinity for Justice Scalia's philosophy and at the same tiime say "a chief justice must be a role model and build consensus." Don't think even Scalia supporters would call him a consensus builder.
  • Historic, but...
    Congratulations to Chief Justice Rush on her historic appointment. It is certainly an accomplishment for any legal practitioner, particularly one pioneering a path to leadership for women. That said, I pray she takes a holistic approach to interpreting the law that considers contemporary policy and societal changes. It's not encouraging to have a "Justice Scalia"-esque approach guiding important decisions.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. why oh why does this state continue to elect these people....do you wonder how much was graft out of the 3.8 billion?

    2. i too think this is a great idea. I think the vision and need is there as well. But also agree with Wendy that there may be better location in our city to fulfill this vision and help grow the sports of hockey and figure skating in Indy. Also to help further develop other parts of the city that seem often forgotten. Any of the other 6 townships out side of the three northernmost could benefit greatly from a facility and a vision like this. For a vision that sounds philanthropic, the location is appears more about the money. Would really like to see it elsewhere, but still wish the development the best of luck, as we can always use more ice in the city. As for the Ice growth when they return, if schedules can be coordinated with the Fuel, what could be better than to have high level hockey available to go see every weekend of the season? Good luck with the development and the return of the Ice.

    3. How many parking spaces do they have at Ironworks? Will residents have reserved spaces or will they have to troll for a space among the people that are there at Ruth Chris & Sangiovese?

    4. You do not get speeding ticket first time you speed and this is not first time Mr.Page has speed. One act should not define a man and this one act won't. He got off with a slap on the wrist. I agree with judge no person was injured by his actions. The state was robbed of money by paying too much rent for a building and that money could have been used for social services. The Page family maybe "generous" with their money but for most part all of it is dirty money that he obtained for sources that are not on the upright. Page is the kind of lawyer that gives lawyers a bad name. He paid off this judge like he has many other tine and walked away. Does he still have his license. I believe so. Hire him to get you confiscated drug money back. He will. It will cost you.

    5. I remain amazed at the level of expertise of the average Internet Television Executive. Obviously they have all the answers and know the business inside and out.

    ADVERTISEMENT