IBJNews

Sale of family-owned business leads to lawsuit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A family dispute over the sale of a business has led a former shareholder to sue her brother and mother, claiming they earned multimillion-dollar profits at her expense by selling the company without her knowledge.

Deborah A. Ecksten of Fortville filed suit in Hamilton Superior Court on Monday following the December 2010 sale of Indianapolis-based Createc Corp. to DeKalb, Ill.-based Tegrant Corp.

Ecksten says in her complaint that brother Alan R. Lewis and mother Linda A. Lewis committed fraud and violated state securities laws by declining to inform her about the $61 million sale until after her stock-option rights expired.

As a result, Ecksten’s share from the sale of $1.5 million was far less than the $15 million made by her mother and $12 million made by her brother, respectively.

“Alan hid from Debbie what he and Linda would receive from the sale of Createc so Debbie would not discover she was deprived of the opportunity to be treated equally with Alan in the sale,” Ecksten’s suit said.

Richard Lewis, the father of Alan and Debbie and former husband of Linda, founded Createc in 1975. The company produced polystyrene and polypropylene foams used to make protective packaging, containers and automotive parts.

As part of a divorce settlement in 2000, the family agreed to a stock-option agreement in which Richard and Linda each received 162.5 shares and Alan and Ecksten 15 shares apiece.

The aim of the agreement was to maintain family control and to give Alan and Ecksten an opportunity to assume greater ownership and control of the company, the suit said.

An amended version they signed in 2007 created a 20-for-1 stock split in which Alan agreed to purchase all of his father’s 2,755 shares for $6 million over a five-year period.

But Ecksten alleges that her brother didn’t have the money to buy the shares and drew on a company line of credit to pay his father.

In 2010, as president and CEO of the company, Alan entered into discussions to sell Createc to its largest competitor, Tegrant, according to the complaint, without informing Ecksten. She claims in her suit that she didn’t learn of the sale until the day before the scheduled closing—Dec. 30, 2010.

Under the stock agreement, Ecksten said she had the right to purchase her mother’s stock for $2,000 a share, similar to how Alan had purchased their father’s stock.

Had she known of the pending sale to Tegrant, Ecksten said she would have purchased her mother’s shares, which ultimately fetched $8,628 each under the terms of the sale.

“Defendants hid from Debbie the deal that had been struck to sell Createc to Tegrant for the sum of $61 million until Dec. 29, 2010, to make sure that Debbie did not exercise her right to purchase all of Linda’s shares for the sum of $2,000 per share,” the suit said.

Ecksten is seeking a judgment against each defendant in an amount “sufficient to fully compensate” her.

Sam Laurin, attorney for Alan and Linda, said his clients believe the suit is without merit. A mediation session is scheduled for Feb. 13.

“We’re disappointed that there was a need to go public with this issue prior to the time that we hope we can resolve it,” Laurin said Monday afternoon.

Also named in the suit are former Createc executives Michael Votaw and Michael Bacon, who owned a minority share in the company.

Createc had three manufacturing plants in the United States and one in Mexico when it was acquired by Tegrant. Tegrant was acquired by Sunoco for $550 million in late 2011.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • the dark side
    Ranger you got this wrong. Those two didn't win. Always two sides to every story. When they appear to goodie to be true they were not good. Richard built a great business and did right by handing down to continue the legacy. Their greed took over. Their disrespect towards Richard the former employees and the few remaining members is disgusting.
  • crook
    I find it very easy for someone to call them a crook when you don't know the details. That's not a very nice thing to say!
  • Pointless Judgement
    I have known this family for 15 years. Alan and Linda Lewis are probably some of the most giving, compassionate and integrity-filled people I've ever met. Their business prowess was honed over decades of hard work. Comparing them to the Dunhams of our city is specious and absurd, especially when you know NOTHING about the situation. Furthermore, Mr. Olson's article is one-sided at best. But what would we expect for "journalists". For the most part, they are people pretending to report facts, then change them drastically as they learn more, to save face, with little or no consequence. I have a feeling those who have instigated this lawsuit are going to face an ending that will not go in their favor. To the detractors in this comment section, remember this post. I'm sure you'll be back to apologize for your half-cocked theories. (insert rolling of eyes)
    • The truth
      As a person and businessman who has known this family since the early days of Createc, I find this representation of the events around the sale of Createc appalling. Please do us the courtesy of finishing this story after ALL the facts are made clear, if you put this in the context of history, remember back to the days when the auto industry was crashing, government bailouts and massive capital infusions to keep the industry and all the supply base viable...you will find a bit of genius in Alan Lewis's ability to position his families well being ahead of any personal greed motive. I believe if one studies this case closely the question of greed will be answered quite clearly.
    • Withhold Judgment
      As someone that has known the Lewis family for more than 30 years, I have a hard time believing the vitriolic accusations stated in this article. I am also saddened to see a private family matter made public. Let’s withhold judgment until the true facts are known.
    • Nice Family
      How do you cheat your sister and father? Ex's stick it to each other all the time. Wonder how Alan Lewis can live with himself. You should be embarassed and ashamed.
    • Don't get it
      What's with people in this town - Durham, Brizzi, Bales, now this guy? Another crook!

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

      2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

      3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

      4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

      5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.

      ADVERTISEMENT