IBJNews

Sale of family-owned business leads to lawsuit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A family dispute over the sale of a business has led a former shareholder to sue her brother and mother, claiming they earned multimillion-dollar profits at her expense by selling the company without her knowledge.

Deborah A. Ecksten of Fortville filed suit in Hamilton Superior Court on Monday following the December 2010 sale of Indianapolis-based Createc Corp. to DeKalb, Ill.-based Tegrant Corp.

Ecksten says in her complaint that brother Alan R. Lewis and mother Linda A. Lewis committed fraud and violated state securities laws by declining to inform her about the $61 million sale until after her stock-option rights expired.

As a result, Ecksten’s share from the sale of $1.5 million was far less than the $15 million made by her mother and $12 million made by her brother, respectively.

“Alan hid from Debbie what he and Linda would receive from the sale of Createc so Debbie would not discover she was deprived of the opportunity to be treated equally with Alan in the sale,” Ecksten’s suit said.

Richard Lewis, the father of Alan and Debbie and former husband of Linda, founded Createc in 1975. The company produced polystyrene and polypropylene foams used to make protective packaging, containers and automotive parts.

As part of a divorce settlement in 2000, the family agreed to a stock-option agreement in which Richard and Linda each received 162.5 shares and Alan and Ecksten 15 shares apiece.

The aim of the agreement was to maintain family control and to give Alan and Ecksten an opportunity to assume greater ownership and control of the company, the suit said.

An amended version they signed in 2007 created a 20-for-1 stock split in which Alan agreed to purchase all of his father’s 2,755 shares for $6 million over a five-year period.

But Ecksten alleges that her brother didn’t have the money to buy the shares and drew on a company line of credit to pay his father.

In 2010, as president and CEO of the company, Alan entered into discussions to sell Createc to its largest competitor, Tegrant, according to the complaint, without informing Ecksten. She claims in her suit that she didn’t learn of the sale until the day before the scheduled closing—Dec. 30, 2010.

Under the stock agreement, Ecksten said she had the right to purchase her mother’s stock for $2,000 a share, similar to how Alan had purchased their father’s stock.

Had she known of the pending sale to Tegrant, Ecksten said she would have purchased her mother’s shares, which ultimately fetched $8,628 each under the terms of the sale.

“Defendants hid from Debbie the deal that had been struck to sell Createc to Tegrant for the sum of $61 million until Dec. 29, 2010, to make sure that Debbie did not exercise her right to purchase all of Linda’s shares for the sum of $2,000 per share,” the suit said.

Ecksten is seeking a judgment against each defendant in an amount “sufficient to fully compensate” her.

Sam Laurin, attorney for Alan and Linda, said his clients believe the suit is without merit. A mediation session is scheduled for Feb. 13.

“We’re disappointed that there was a need to go public with this issue prior to the time that we hope we can resolve it,” Laurin said Monday afternoon.

Also named in the suit are former Createc executives Michael Votaw and Michael Bacon, who owned a minority share in the company.

Createc had three manufacturing plants in the United States and one in Mexico when it was acquired by Tegrant. Tegrant was acquired by Sunoco for $550 million in late 2011.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • crook
    I find it very easy for someone to call them a crook when you don't know the details. That's not a very nice thing to say!
  • Pointless Judgement
    I have known this family for 15 years. Alan and Linda Lewis are probably some of the most giving, compassionate and integrity-filled people I've ever met. Their business prowess was honed over decades of hard work. Comparing them to the Dunhams of our city is specious and absurd, especially when you know NOTHING about the situation. Furthermore, Mr. Olson's article is one-sided at best. But what would we expect for "journalists". For the most part, they are people pretending to report facts, then change them drastically as they learn more, to save face, with little or no consequence. I have a feeling those who have instigated this lawsuit are going to face an ending that will not go in their favor. To the detractors in this comment section, remember this post. I'm sure you'll be back to apologize for your half-cocked theories. (insert rolling of eyes)
  • The truth
    As a person and businessman who has known this family since the early days of Createc, I find this representation of the events around the sale of Createc appalling. Please do us the courtesy of finishing this story after ALL the facts are made clear, if you put this in the context of history, remember back to the days when the auto industry was crashing, government bailouts and massive capital infusions to keep the industry and all the supply base viable...you will find a bit of genius in Alan Lewis's ability to position his families well being ahead of any personal greed motive. I believe if one studies this case closely the question of greed will be answered quite clearly.
  • Withhold Judgment
    As someone that has known the Lewis family for more than 30 years, I have a hard time believing the vitriolic accusations stated in this article. I am also saddened to see a private family matter made public. Let’s withhold judgment until the true facts are known.
  • Nice Family
    How do you cheat your sister and father? Ex's stick it to each other all the time. Wonder how Alan Lewis can live with himself. You should be embarassed and ashamed.
  • Don't get it
    What's with people in this town - Durham, Brizzi, Bales, now this guy? Another crook!

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. If a television station wants to improve viewership, get rid of the local blackout. I was born by the brickyard, and have attended 15 or more races. I have children now, I won't attend unless circumstances are perfect. As those with growing families know, they never are. I'm always impressed that upwards of 250,000 people attend the 500. However, as a growing, or, more apt, sprawling city, Indianapolis and its immediate suburbs count almost 2.2 million. Show the race live, let the venue get a kick-back on revenues, and open-wheel racing might have a fighting chance to be relevant again. Just in time for those tax-payer lights to make sense.

    2. John Moore, I too have had the same issue recently. A property next to my house was on the Land Bank and I was interested in purchasing. When I tried to contact Reggie, I got back emails that had nothing to do with what I asked about. Actually my latest response from him was on this past Friday. I had asked about how to buy the property and if it was still available. His response to me was to contact the mayor's office to get the schedule of his appearances. (???) Hopefully the city is able to do something to fix what this guy has done, it would be nice if they would take the properties back and sell them properly so land owners like me and you mother would have a fair chance.

    3. I too work in the industry, with over 25 years of experience and your political spin has probably nothing to do with any rebranding. "Let's dress it up" would have nothing to do with the government "telling us how and what to eat." Give it a political rest. And being a producer for a radio show doesn't mean you've been involved in advertising and branding for 30 years.

    4. Ms. Morris did not understand the ways of the business world, otherwise, like the IMS, she could have petitioned the State Legislature for a handout of State Funds for her charity work. Ms. Morris should consider becoming a state lobbyist for Lemonade Stand Operators.

    5. David Copperfield!

    ADVERTISEMENT